Hi,
project too. Right now it's Maven 2 3. It can either be Maven
3 or
simply Maven. Thoughts?
Good point, clean up the JIRA frontpage of MNG. Do you have the
permission to do so? If yes, please proceed for Maven.
+1
the Jira project description can be administered like other items
So
I am thinking the older versions in JIRA should also be archived (i.e.,
taken off the road map). That's still on the todo list, right?
Cheers,
Paul
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de
wrote:
Hi,
project too. Right now it's Maven 2 3. It can either be
Am 2014-06-18 04:25, schrieb Paul Benedict:
Since 2.x is discontinued, this is our opportunity to rename the JIRA
project too. Right now it's Maven 2 3. It can either be Maven 3 or
simply Maven. Thoughts?
Good point, clean up the JIRA frontpage of MNG. Do you have the
permission to do so? If
Le mercredi 18 juin 2014 08:12:20 Michael Osipov a écrit :
Am 2014-06-18 04:25, schrieb Paul Benedict:
Since 2.x is discontinued, this is our opportunity to rename the JIRA
project too. Right now it's Maven 2 3. It can either be Maven 3 or
simply Maven. Thoughts?
Good point, clean up
Just start nuking/moving/cleaning if you think it makes sense.
On Jun 17, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Michael Osipov micha...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks,
has anyone of you ever check the roadmap in JIRA lately?
There are several versions which will probably never be released. Moveover,
all
Hi,
has anyone of you ever check the roadmap in JIRA lately?
There are several versions which will probably never be released.
Moveover, all tickets for 2.2.2 are fixed.
Can we clean up upcoming versions?
Are we going to release a EOL 2.2.2?
In february we had decided not to release any 2.X
Am 2014-06-17 21:17, schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi,
has anyone of you ever check the roadmap in JIRA lately?
There are several versions which will probably never be released.
Moveover, all tickets for 2.2.2 are fixed.
Can we clean up upcoming versions?
Are we going to release a EOL 2.2.2?
Am 2014-06-17 21:14, schrieb Jason van Zyl:
Just start nuking/moving/cleaning if you think it makes sense.
Just did for 2.2.x. But are we going to relase 3.0.6 or 3.1.2? I don't
think so because all energy is being put into 3.2.x. If so, should we
declare at least 3.0.x as EOL? If not,
On Jun 17, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Michael Osipov micha...@apache.org wrote:
Am 2014-06-17 21:14, schrieb Jason van Zyl:
Just start nuking/moving/cleaning if you think it makes sense.
Just did for 2.2.x. But are we going to relase 3.0.6 or 3.1.2? I don't think
so because all energy is being put
Am 2014-06-17 21:57, schrieb Jason van Zyl:
On Jun 17, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Michael Osipov micha...@apache.org
wrote:
Am 2014-06-17 21:14, schrieb Jason van Zyl:
Just start nuking/moving/cleaning if you think it makes sense.
Just did for 2.2.x. But are we going to relase 3.0.6 or 3.1.2? I
Since 2.x is discontinued, this is our opportunity to rename the JIRA
project too. Right now it's Maven 2 3. It can either be Maven 3 or
simply Maven. Thoughts?
Cheers,
Paul
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Michael Osipov micha...@apache.org wrote:
Am 2014-06-17 21:57, schrieb Jason van
11 matches
Mail list logo
