They should rename going forward.
At some point (probably we could do so now) we will turn on enforcement in
the maven-plugin-plugin.
This will of course piss of a lot of people. Wouldn't it?
There are, of course, several reasons why people can't:
1. Popularity of the old name
2. Technical
1. We sent an announcement a long time ago.
2. We switched the maven-plugin-plugin to a warning a good while ago:
https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-tools/commit/f88a58cecb4599e70b8fecf8b13d77d5e084be9c
If people have ignored that warning for three years, then we have done all
we can. The
Keep in mind that what we have here is almost certainly a
_convention_, not a point of trademark law. As I understand it, we'd
as likely be laughed at for the suggestion that reversing the order of
the components of a name leads to 'marketplace confusion' at the level
at which trademarks can be
We, the PMC, agreed to allow permitted usage of the form ___-maven-plugin
as that clarified that the plugin was a plugin for maven not one produced
by maven
On 10 October 2014 12:40, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Keep in mind that what we have here is almost certainly a
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
We, the PMC, agreed to allow permitted usage of the form ___-maven-plugin
as that clarified that the plugin was a plugin for maven not one produced
by maven
Yea, I know, and I'm not opposed to making the
We just need to show best effort to defend our trademark... if we *see*
anyone doing that then we have to send them CD letters...
Note: my understanding is that we only have to send CD letters when we
know somebody is abusing our mark... we don't necessarily have to go
actively looking for people
If you do a quick search on Central, you'll that even other Apache project
don't adhere to this convention. Should they receive a CD too?
Michael
We just need to show best effort to defend our trademark... if we *see*
anyone doing that then we have to send them CD letters...
Note: my
Yes
On 10 October 2014 13:12, Michael Osipov 1983-01...@gmx.net wrote:
If you do a quick search on Central, you'll that even other Apache project
don't adhere to this convention. Should they receive a CD too?
Michael
We just need to show best effort to defend our trademark... if we *see*
Thankfully for you, you are not on the PMC... if you were on the PMC and
you did such a search you would then have to go and send CDs.
/me runs away from this thread in case I happen to be made aware of any
trademark misuse ;-)
On 10 October 2014 13:39, Stephen Connolly
Yes, resposibility isn't always good.
Shouldn't simply make the build fail instead of log when such a collision
happens?
Michael
Thankfully for you, you are not on the PMC... if you were on the PMC and
you did such a search you would then have to go and send CDs.
/me runs away from this
That was the plan 3 years ago we decided to warn first and then switch
on failing after a while... now is a good time, perhaps you could commit
the change to fail the build?
On 10 October 2014 13:48, Michael Osipov 1983-01...@gmx.net wrote:
Yes, resposibility isn't always good.
Shouldn't
Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Re: Re: Re: Maven plugin naming pattern
That was the plan 3 years ago we decided to warn first and then switch
on failing after a while... now is a good time, perhaps you could commit
the change to fail the build?
On 10 October 2014 13:48
: Freitag, 10. Oktober 2014 um 15:23 Uhr
Von: Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
An: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Re: Re: Re: Maven plugin naming pattern
That was the plan 3 years ago we decided to warn first and then
switch
on failing after
Hi,
On 10/10/14 3:41 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
I would prefer this should be part of Maven Core's warning system. If the
plugin starts with maven- and it's not an org.apache.maven.plugins group,
then we should spit out the error. I am not sure enforcer is the right
place for this rule;
14 matches
Mail list logo
