+1
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023, 12:44 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 4 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317223=12353283
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
>
+1
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023, 21:45 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317527=12352247
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
>
+1
On Sun, Oct 22, 2023, 16:21 Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317229=12342769
>
> NOTE: This is the last release - preparing for the retiring plugin.
> So all remaining issues will be closed - as
+1
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023, 08:11 Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 4 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317224=12353735
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
>
Le lundi 23 octobre 2023, 10:00:59 CEST Guillaume Nodet a écrit :
> Le sam. 21 oct. 2023 à 18:19, Herve Boutemy a écrit :
> > I updated release notes
> >
> > a few remarks/questions:
> >
> > - it would be nice to have a description in Jira issues for all the new
> > features, because some
+1
Thanks for rolling this release!
Maarten
On 20/10/2023 23:37, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'm starting a new vote to release this new alpha.
This alpha release provides new cornerstone features for the future Maven
evolution.
In particular, the POM model which was set in stone to a 4.0.0
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven JXR version 3.3.1
This module generates browsable HTML pages from Java source code.
https://maven.apache.org/jxr/
You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration:
org.apache.maven.plugins
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1: Sylwester Lachiewicz, Hervé Boutemy, Benjamin Marwell, Michael Osipov
PMC quorum: reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo, the source release ZIP
file
and add this release the board report.
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1: Sylwester Lachiewicz, Hervé Boutemy, Romain Manni-Bucau, Tamás
Cservenák, Slawomir Jaranowski, Michael Osipov
PMC quorum: reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo, the source release ZIP
file
and add this release the
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1: Benjamin Marwell, Michael Osipov, Slawomir Jaranowski, Hervé
Boutemy, Tamás Cservenák, Sylwester Lachiewicz
PMC quorum: reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo, the source release ZIP
file
and add this release the
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Surefire version 3.2.1.
https://maven.apache.org/surefire/
Release Notes - Maven Surefire - Version 3.2.1
** Bug
* [SUREFIRE-2190] - optional dependencies and JPMS modules confuse
surefire
* [SUREFIRE-2196] -
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven
Dependency Plugin version 3.6.1.
https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/
You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration:
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-dependency-plugin
3.6.1
+1
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 16:11, Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We solved 4 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317224=12353735
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
Le sam. 21 oct. 2023 à 18:19, Herve Boutemy a écrit :
> I updated release notes
>
> a few remarks/questions:
>
> - it would be nice to have a description in Jira issues for all the new
> features, because some titles are interesting but Jira is empty and I can't
> figure out how to use the
Hi,
We solved 4 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317224=12353735
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
Le 2023-10-20 à 20 h 43, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
that said, on my side, not sure JPMS will be widely adopted anytime
soon so can be a false problem.
I think that this is a chicken-and-egg problem: some peoples renounce to
JPMS because tools support is poor (at least in Maven and
the point is that if you open, as you mention, a system you always end up
having compatibility matrix - no plugin except yours will read your meta -
so this becomes a nightmare for end users, whereas when there is a standard
way - no built-in extensibility - then you never have this issue and it
I always wished there was support for generic element in
this can then be literally used for everything in an
extensible way.
... usual stuff ...
module
...
Am 23.10.23 um 11:24 schrieb Martin Desruisseaux:
Le 2023-10-20 à 20 h 43, Romain Manni-Bucau a
Le lun. 23 oct. 2023 à 11:31, Christoph Läubrich a
écrit :
> I always wished there was support for generic element in
> this can then be literally used for everything in an
> extensible way.
>
>
>
> ... usual stuff ...
>
> module
> ...
>
>
>
>
Exactly
Le 2023-10-23 à 11 h 28, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
anyway, if we go with the "usages" path we can want to enable a
definition containing wrapped in a
scope () this way you
can reference a dependency set in a plugin or even main dependencies
(import all).
Maybe, but the element
> Exactly the opposite right?
of what?
> If we do that then a particular plugin can use that but all others
> will don't read it right
Whats "right" depends on the context, at least one don't need a new
discussion/extension for each use case, also most of these discussions
cover the needs of
well chicken-egg or just lack of need (from my window the people you
reference are very few and mainly testers)
anyway, if we go with the "usages" path we can want to enable a <
dependenciesSet> definition containing wrapped in a scope
() this way you can
reference a dependency set in a
Le 2023-10-23 à 11 h 48, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
(…snip…) but still, I don't think we need that for the mentionned issue.
For agents, alternatives have indeed been proposed in this thread. But
some form of usage specification (either as element or
composition) will be needed anyway at
On 20/10/2023 20:43, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Can be the way to define the lookup, an heuristic will never work by
design...that said, on my side, not sure JPMS will be widely adopted
anytime soon so can be a false problem.
This is a chicken and egg problem. My company would love to use JPMS
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix with umask 022
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/10/23 06:11:22 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 4 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317224=12353735
>
> There are still a couple
25 matches
Mail list logo
