Yep you got a point, I hate streams either.(especially when using streams
be not necessary.)
Romain Manni-Bucau 于2024年2月23日周五 22:43写道：
> From my experience people hating var will also hate completionstage and at
> some point streams (or they willfully embrace them just using forEach which
> is
Le ven. 23 févr. 2024 à 13:44, Elliotte Rusty Harold a
écrit :
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:23 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> >
> > @Elliotte while you are pretty right in terms of *compile* features but
> it
> > ignores the biggest criteria for any ASF project : the community. Even if
> >
Yes, with var you still get type checks, unlike in Python. But I have
wasted so much time debugging Python code simply because the type of a
local variable wasn't right there in the declaration that I remain
unconvinced var was ever a good idea. I have been convinced by
experience that implicitly
Howdy,
Some more stats based on 2nd package from Brian
https://gist.github.com/cstamas/8207f8d70882090a1c63cdedc256ec56
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:08 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> Yes, with var you still get type checks, unlike in Python. But I have
> wasted so much time debugging Python
Updated with 3.8.x and 3.9.x data, reload if opened
T
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:52 PM Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Some more stats based on 2nd package from Brian
>
> https://gist.github.com/cstamas/8207f8d70882090a1c63cdedc256ec56
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 2:08 PM Elliotte Rusty
I hate var.
From: Tamás Cservenák
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 9:52:08 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven
Howdy,
Some more stats based on 2nd package from Brian
One ask for a volunteer:
We are all humans, and we all make mistakes. So I'd like to ask someone to
reproduce these results.
We should not take these for granted, as I may have missed/spoiled/broke
something.
All the data sources are in this thread (both sent by Brian).
Thanks
T
On Fri, Feb 23,
Make love not var!
T
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 3:09 PM Xeno Amess wrote:
> I hate var.
>
> From: Tamás Cservenák
> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2024 9:52:08 PM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Java version for Maven
>
> Howdy,
>
> Some more
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:20 AM Robert Dean wrote:
> That being said, if retiring Java 8 and lower output support allows
> Maven to shed technical debt and deliver improvements faster, I'd get
> over my disappointment. :)
Given the amount of tech debt still in Maven from Maven 2 and earlier,
I
@Elliotte while you are pretty right in terms of *compile* features but it
ignores the biggest criteria for any ASF project : the community. Even if
silly, attracting people with Java 8 is born dead today (to illustrate it
just ask somebody to no more use "var" to do a PR for ex, he will start to
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 12:23 PM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
>
> @Elliotte while you are pretty right in terms of *compile* features but it
> ignores the biggest criteria for any ASF project : the community. Even if
> silly, attracting people with Java 8 is born dead today (to illustrate it
> just
On 23.02.24 01:42, Hunter C Payne wrote:
The performance benefits aren't provided by the compiler, they come from
hotspot and that's the JVM version at runtime that matters there.
this is only partially correct. Many optimizations are based on
invokedynamic which only exists post bytecode
>From my experience people hating var will also hate completionstage and at
some point streams (or they willfully embrace them just using forEach which
is a counter usage IMHO).
Every time I digged it was 100% a knowledge+(IT) culture thing.
But once again, I'm not sure it is about us - if so I
13 matches
Mail list logo
