Question about 2.1.0 / 3.0.0.
In 3.0 alpha2 Jason fix a problem with jaxws-maven.
Could it be backported to 2.1.0 ?
Also did this new 'mileston' will be used in m2eclipse.
I know Maven 3.0 is the target for m2eclipse but during the intermin,
having a stable and known 2.1 would be nice.
On 18/02/2009, at 7:43 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Question about 2.1.0 / 3.0.0.
In 3.0 alpha2 Jason fix a problem with jaxws-maven.
Could it be backported to 2.1.0 ?
I believe that problem doesn't affect 2.1.0.
Also did this new 'mileston' will be used in m2eclipse.
I know Maven 3.0 is
2009/2/18 Brett Porter br...@apache.org:
On 18/02/2009, at 7:43 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Question about 2.1.0 / 3.0.0.
In 3.0 alpha2 Jason fix a problem with jaxws-maven.
Could it be backported to 2.1.0 ?
I believe that problem doesn't affect 2.1.0.
Nope, the jaxws maven plugin didn't
As was highlighted before in these threads, this is a completely
different 2.1.0 to the one previously included in m2eclipse (it never
has been included):
http://www.sonatype.com/people/2008/11/a-visual-history-of-maven-2/
- Brett
On 18/02/2009, at 10:32 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
2009/2/18
I build my JAX-WS project with maven 2.1.0-M1 and it works :)
Good news, but could it be used in m2eclipse ?
2009/2/18 Brett Porter br...@apache.org:
As was highlighted before in these threads, this is a completely different
2.1.0 to the one previously included in m2eclipse (it never has been
On 18/02/2009, at 11:59 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
I build my JAX-WS project with maven 2.1.0-M1 and it works :)
Good news, but could it be used in m2eclipse ?
It's really something to take up with m2eclipse... but I don't see it
happening for the reason I outlined earlier regarding the
Hi Dennis/Brian,
Does the vote could continue with this new staging or do we need a new thread?
Cheers,
Vincent
2009/2/17, Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nu:
The new staging repo location is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-4847e34
062fc70/
Just
2009/2/18 Brett Porter br...@apache.org:
On 18/02/2009, at 11:59 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
I build my JAX-WS project with maven 2.1.0-M1 and it works :)
Good news, but could it be used in m2eclipse ?
It's really something to take up with m2eclipse... but I don't see it
happening for the
IMO it should continue, I merely copied the artifacts from one
location to another. Inspecting the signatures should validate the
artifacts.
--Brian (mobile)
On Feb 18, 2009, at 8:16 AM, Vincent Siveton
vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dennis/Brian,
Does the vote could continue
I know the vote is closed, but +1
Emmanuel
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Oleg Gusakov
oleg.subscripti...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Main reason for this release - bug fixes. A lot of testing done on the
repository side, IT coverage on repository components is 60-70 %
We solved 11 issues:
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven 2.0.10
This is a stable bug fix release and you can see the full list of
issues fixed at
http://maven.apache.org/release-notes.html
Enjoy,
-The Maven team
-
To
On 18/02/2009, at 4:58 PM, John Casey wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
On 18/02/2009, at 7:23 AM, John Casey wrote:
It will take less effort for me to just keep working on issues
until they are done, so that's what I'll do. So, agreed, next
version is 2.1.0, standard RC cycle applies.
I'm
+1
FYI I already staged the site early this month:
http://people.apache.org/~vsiveton/doxia-1.0.x/
Cheers,
Vincent
2009/2/11 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org:
Hi,
(resending due to SMTP-server problems)
The time has finally come to release Doxia 1.0. For more info on the
relationship
On 15/02/2009, at 2:05 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
This is probably moreso for the repositories elements - there's a
chance some projects will be referring to snapshots in both places.
The current one is a group that is logically combining the old and new
repos, there's no reason not to use the
+1
(note possible problems with the remote configuration that I've
replied to on a separate mail, but the POMs themselves are fine).
- Brett
On 18/02/2009, at 12:42 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
New parents need to be released with the new distributionManagement
sections pointed at
+1
Vincent
2009/2/17 Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nu:
New parents need to be released with the new distributionManagement
sections pointed at repository.apache.org:
Apache Pom Diffs:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/apache-5/pom.xml?r1=639584r
2=745325diff_format=h
2.1 has actually served the purpose it was intended for and should be
released. Obviously, the other items that were intended for 2.1
haven't been completed and shouldn't hold things up. So +1 on
releasing 2.1.0 now.
As for the other items that weren't completed, at this point it is
As far as I know, I've been using it but haven't cleared my repo. If you
browse it's only going to show stuff that has been proxied, not the entire
contents of p.a.o.
On 2/18/09 10:41 AM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote:
On 15/02/2009, at 2:05 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
This is probably
Many projects that provide artifacts via maven often include only the
binary and source artifacts. If a user is just starting with maven, it
can be frustrating not being able to get the JavaDoc artifact in the
same manner as the other variants.
This is particularly important in GUIs
Hi guys,
I got an email from Arje Cahn with a proposal to make a Maven
GetTogether/Meetup during the ApacheCON in Amsterdam. I am
very interested in such an event but I do feel that it will only make
sense if more of the Maven developers are present at the
conference.
I know for sure me, Carlos
Seems to be proxying just fine:
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/asyncweb/asyncweb-spri
ng/maven-metadata.xml
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/maven/maven-project-bu
ilder/3.0-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml
-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox
Maria (Deng) is going to be there too
It'd be a good idea.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Petar Tahchiev paranoia...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I got an email from Arje Cahn with a proposal to make a Maven
GetTogether/Meetup during the ApacheCON in Amsterdam. I am
very interested in such
+1
--
Olivier
2009/2/18 Brian E. Fox bri...@reply.infinity.nu:
New parents need to be released with the new distributionManagement
sections pointed at repository.apache.org:
Apache Pom Diffs:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/apache-5/pom.xml?r1=639584r
2=745325diff_format=h
+1
Brian E. Fox wrote:
New parents need to be released with the new distributionManagement
sections pointed at repository.apache.org:
Apache Pom Diffs:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/pom/tags/apache-5/pom.xml?r1=639584r
2=745325diff_format=h
Staged at:
I am modifying the bootstrap and am hitting a problem:
Generating sources for maven-model/src/main/mdo/maven.mdo
[java] Usage: modello model outputType output directory
modelVersion packageWithVersionuseJava5 [encoding]
Has modello CLI been changed recently? The bootstrap ant macro calls it
Just testing the wrapping problem I seem to have:
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/asyncweb/asyncweb-spri
ng/maven-metadata.xml
-Original Message-
From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:bri...@reply.infinity.nu]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 2:37 PM
To: Maven Developers List
The link to the release notes on http://maven.apache.org/release-notes.html
still points to the 2.0.9 release notes.
Reinhard
-Original Message-
From: briane...@gmail.com [mailto:briane...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Brian Fox
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 3:48 PM
To:
27 matches
Mail list logo
