Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Archetype Plugin version 2.1

2011-09-04 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
here is my +1 Le mercredi 31 août 2011, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : Hi, We solved 24 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11095styleName= Htmlversion=16795 There are still a good number of issues left in JIRA:

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Archetype Plugin version 2.1

2011-09-04 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Kristian Rosenvold, Vincent Siveton, John Casey, Olivier Lamy, Emmanuel Venisse, Hervé Boutemy +1 (non binding): Tamás Cservenák, Jesse Glick I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.

RE: I'd like to release maven-plugin-plugin

2011-09-04 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Benson, about MPLUGIN-181: The right to solve this is a java-escape of the forward slash, so: default-value=**\/*.xml Might be worth an entry for the FAQ's. -Robert Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 09:38:24 -0400 Subject: I'd like to release maven-plugin-plugin From: bimargul...@gmail.com

[ANN] Maven Archetype Plugin 2.1 Released

2011-09-04 Thread Hervé Boutemy
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Archetype Plugin, version 2.1 Archetype is a Maven project templating toolkit. http://maven.apache.org/archetype/maven-archetype-plugin/ Release Notes - Maven Archetype - Version 2.1 ** Bug * [ARCHETYPE-220] - Unable to

Inserting into the middle of a lifecycle

2011-09-04 Thread Benson Margulies
I'm trying to be slightly helpful to the Tycho project. They have a problem: they need to define a lifecycle that adds a plugin to a phase *not at the end* of the plugins in the standard lifecycle. Has anyone else thought about this?

Re: [ANN] Maven Archetype Plugin 2.1 Released

2011-09-04 Thread Sebastian Otaegui
This is an awesome set of features Congrats!!! On Sep 4, 2011 8:05 AM, Hervé Boutemy hbout...@apache.org wrote: The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Archetype Plugin, version 2.1 Archetype is a Maven project templating toolkit.

Re: Inserting into the middle of a lifecycle

2011-09-04 Thread Brett Porter
On 05/09/2011, at 3:49 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: I'm trying to be slightly helpful to the Tycho project. They have a problem: they need to define a lifecycle that adds a plugin to a phase *not at the end* of the plugins in the standard lifecycle. Has anyone else thought about this?

Re: Inserting into the middle of a lifecycle

2011-09-04 Thread Benson Margulies
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: On 05/09/2011, at 3:49 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: I'm trying to be slightly helpful to the Tycho project. They have a problem: they need to define a lifecycle that adds a plugin to a phase *not at the end* of the plugins

Re: Inserting into the middle of a lifecycle

2011-09-04 Thread Brett Porter
On 05/09/2011, at 10:37 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: On 05/09/2011, at 3:49 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: I'm trying to be slightly helpful to the Tycho project. They have a problem: they need to define a lifecycle that

Where to report bugs against apache jar resource bundle?

2011-09-04 Thread sebb
Looked around; cannot find out where to report bugs in the apache jar resource bundle. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: Inserting into the middle of a lifecycle

2011-09-04 Thread Igor Fedorenko
I agree that adding new phase (or phases) does not look like a scalable solution. For example, in addition to signing, Eclipse projects are encouraged to pack200 their artifacts, but neither signing nor pack200 are mandatory. So we need to be able add both sign and pack200 steps to the lifecycle

Re: Where to report bugs against apache jar resource bundle?

2011-09-04 Thread Brett Porter
I don't believe there is one. Probably the easiest thing to do would be to create some new components in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPOM (I know they aren't POMs, but it's basically the same scope). On 05/09/2011, at 12:41 PM, sebb wrote: Looked around; cannot find out where to