Re: Is it possible to have file system access in Jenkins?

@stephenc thx, downloaded Tell me how are we going to solve this issue next time. - BR, tibor17 -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-have-file-system-access-in-Jenkins-tp5809566p5810098.html Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive

Pluggable ScopeResolver?

Hi, sorry for cross posting this to the maven and the aether dev-list, but my question is sort of cross-cutting and I don't quite know where it fits best. I maintain the Flexmojos plugin, a maven plugin for building Apache Flex applications. In this we allways have had some custom scopes for

[VOTE] Release Maven Parent POM 25, Maven Plugins Parent POM 26, Maven Shared Components Parent POM 21, Maven Skins Parent POM 10

Hi, We solved 5/0/0/0 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311250version=12326716 https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311250version=12326717

Re: Is it possible to have file system access in Jenkins?

we can see about getting andrew to give committers a bit more permissions... remind me after the madness that is JUC and the next release of Jenkins Enterprise (mid nov) On 19 October 2014 09:37, tibor17 tibo...@lycos.com wrote: @stephenc thx, downloaded Tell me how are we going to solve this

Toolchains part of Maven distribution / global toolchains

Hi, since we're slowly upgrading the minimum JDK to run Maven it becomes more and more important to let our users know how they can compile with an ancient/older version of the JDK. I think we all agree that toolchains is the way to go. I proposed to add the toolchains to the Maven

Re: Toolchains part of Maven distribution / global toolchains

Hello, I think the user config has already a very big meaning because of multiple reasons: Typically developer workstations and CI servers all are single-user only. So the builds are always executed with the same user. So there is nobody complayning if the system is not configured on a system

Re: Toolchains part of Maven distribution / global toolchains

Maybe I found an explanation for the location. Current 'global' isn't really global. It's bound to the Maven installation. So for instance: whenever you upgrade your Maven, you shouldn't forget to copy the settings.xml. By putting it under the user.home, you'll never have to change it. So it

Re: Toolchains part of Maven distribution / global toolchains

Hi, On 10/19/14 7:25 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: Maybe I found an explanation for the location. Current 'global' isn't really global. It's bound to the Maven installation. So for instance: whenever you upgrade your Maven, you shouldn't forget to copy the settings.xml. That's exactly the

Re: [aether-dev] Pluggable ScopeResolver?

Christofer Dutz wrote: sorry for cross posting this to the maven and the aether dev-list, but my question is sort of cross-cutting and I don't quite know where it fits best. [...] Having a look at the code, I think it should be easy to create some sort of PluggableScopeResolver, which

Re: Q: Maven Toolchain

Am Wed, 19 Feb 2014 19:17:03 +0100 schrieb Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net: One thing it can be used for is to define a different JDK to be used (than the one used for executing Maven itself). More info here: http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-using-toolchains.html What is quite