Re: Maven Docker Images

2017-10-20 Thread Manfred Moser
>From my perspective it is just like sdkman including the conclusion. We have >other tasks at our hands, maintaining a docker images is not something we >should bother with. However needs one can easily create one and there will be >thousands of variations different users want. Let them

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.2

2017-10-20 Thread Mark Derricutt
+1 looking good from here on my projects/releases. -- "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, Porcupine Tree On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 26 issues: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.2

2017-10-20 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 tested on Linux and Windows 10 (with cmd, PowerShell, GitBash, Cygwin) this time, color appears on Windows in every configuration I know of :) verification of binary artifacts: I tried to compare binary artifacts built locally with artifacts in staging repo (using diffoscope) Good news:

Re: Maven Docker Images

2017-10-20 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
true, from a general perspective, it's like sdkman we need to discuss then decide if we want to maintain Maven Docker integration (contrary to our current decision to not maintain Maven sdkman integration but let sdkman community do it) can we think about a general solution? perhaps not

[GitHub] maven issue #109: Update Mockito to 2.x

2017-10-20 Thread hboutemy
Github user hboutemy commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/109 great, thank you --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.2

2017-10-20 Thread Petr Široký
+1 (non-binding) Tested with OracleJDK 1.8.0_144 on several large multi-module projects. No issue found. Petr On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:46 PM Arnaud Héritier wrote: > +1 for me too > Used it with no issue (but my usages are limited) > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:34 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.2

2017-10-20 Thread Arnaud Héritier
+1 for me too Used it with no issue (but my usages are limited) On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > +1 > > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:50:43 +0200, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, >> >> We solved 26 issues: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.2

2017-10-20 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:50:43 +0200, Stephen Connolly wrote: Hi, We solved 26 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12338964=Text=12316922 There are 357 issues left in JIRA for Maven core:

Re: Maven plugins, Java 9, and split packages

2017-10-20 Thread Mark Raynsford
On 2017-10-20T14:43:52 +0200 "Robert Scholte" wrote: > > > This looks to be a case of split packages amongst all of the various > > Maven artifacts. I'm adding dependency exclusions to try to work around > > the issues, but I'm not confident that'll actually work. > > > >

Re: Maven plugins, Java 9, and split packages

2017-10-20 Thread Robert Scholte
This looks to be a case of split packages amongst all of the various Maven artifacts. I'm adding dependency exclusions to try to work around the issues, but I'm not confident that'll actually work. Are there efforts underway to clean this stuff up? No, Maven has its own modular system long

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.2

2017-10-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 from me, tested on a number of projects for the last couple of days... not found any regressions from 3.5.0 On 18 October 2017 at 03:51, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Analyzer... > > stagingUrl: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1373 >

Maven plugins, Java 9, and split packages

2017-10-20 Thread Mark Raynsford
Hello. I'm experimenting with modularizing an existing plugin (japicmp [0]) and am running into hundreds of errors of the form: [ERROR] the unnamed module reads package org.apache.maven.plugin from both maven.plugin.api and maven.core [ERROR] the unnamed module reads package

[GitHub] maven issue #109: Update Mockito to 2.x

2017-10-20 Thread slachiewicz
Github user slachiewicz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/109 ok, MNG-6196 with slf4j was merged to master - i'm clossing this issue. Mockito will be in diffrent pull. --- - To

[GitHub] maven pull request #109: Update Mockito to 2.x

2017-10-20 Thread slachiewicz
Github user slachiewicz closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/109 --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: Maven Docker Images

2017-10-20 Thread Robert Scholte
Isn't this actually the same case as sdkman[1]? Just wondering if we need to think about a general solution instead of pulling everything into our project when possible. thanks, Robert [1] http://markmail.org/message/oofvszmf56tbr7et On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:30:57 +0200, Hervé BOUTEMY

Re: Maven Docker Images

2017-10-20 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Official docker images are not pushed to dockerhub. Docker builds them from sources at GitHub https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/master/library/maven On Fri, Oct 20, 2017, 08:20 Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > I would start with filing INFRA ticket :) > > On

Re: Maven Docker Images

2017-10-20 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
I would start with filing INFRA ticket :) On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > awesome: there is some common practice we should get into > > do you know if there some docs somewhere? > I suppose there are some credentials associated to publishing to