Building a Java8 project just using JDK9

Sorry for the typo in the subject Il lun 10 apr 2017, 17:37 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi, > I would like be able to build an existing project developed for java8 by > simple running Maven on jdk9. > > Actually it is not possible, I am aware of th

Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

Hi, I would like be able to build an existing project developed for java8 by simple running Maven on jdk9. Actually it is not possible, I am aware of that and I am currently following all the news about Maven and Java9 So I would like to "help" in order to "get things working" as Java9 now

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

Il lun 10 apr 2017, 22:32 Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org> ha scritto: > On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 22:23:27 +0200, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Il lun 10 apr 2017, 18:57 Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de> ha > > scritto: > >

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

Il lun 10 apr 2017, 18:57 Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de> ha scritto: > Hi, > > On 10/04/17 17:37, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like be able to build an existing project developed for java8 by > > simple running Maven on jdk9. > > >

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

s section? > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+9+-+Jigsaw > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le mardi 11 avril 2017, 10:14:12 CEST Enrico Olivelli a écrit : > > Thank you all for your quick answers > > > > @Robert > > I have checked out the code and to

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

not tests 2017-04-10 22:46 GMT+02:00 Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de>: > Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > Il lun 10 apr 2017, 18:57 Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de> ha > > scritto: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 10/04/17 17:37

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

code change. Is this a good short/mid term solution ? Can a submit a JIRA ? 2017-04-11 10:25 GMT+02:00 Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com>: > Hi Enrico, > > Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > Thank you all for your quick answers > > > > @Robert >

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

> Then vendors of web browsers and Linux dist would be happy to > integrate > >> > small JRE into and use JavaFX. > >> > > >> > But now it is not possible because the modules are basically three: > >> > > >> > java.base == 37MB > >>

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

till would not guarantee that there is no risk > that Jigsaw project made some mistake which (if happens) cannot be taken > back after the final release of JSE9. > > > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Il lun 14 a

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

ions and gradually switch to java9 Cheers Enrico > Gary > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Il mar 15 ago 2017, 00:03 Tibor Digana <tibor.dig...@googlemail.com> ha > > scritto: > > > >

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

t ro get rid of it we have to only add java.se.ee module > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Enrico Olivelli [via Maven] < > ml+s40175n5912520...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > > > Il dom 13 ago 2017, 17:31 Tibor Digana <[hidden email] > > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?t

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

gt; upon import sections in Java classes and Maven dependencies. > Not easy I guess. > I think this will be not feasible in general and very dangerous and maybe I hope maven will never do such things Cheers Enrico > > > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive.

Re: [JAVA 9] Need for review of branch SUREFIRE-1403

ike to > kindly ask you to join us on IRC channel, maybe after your vacation. > Can you give me the address? I can use my phone. Today I am at home and I had the opportunity to use my laptop Enrico Thx. > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 2:07 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> &g

Re: [JAVA 9] Need for review of branch SUREFIRE-1403

+1 for me I have checked out branch SUREFIRE-1403 and I was able to run tests of an application which uses java.sql.Timestamp without changes in code, just but upgrading surefire to 21.1-SNAPSHOT Unfortunately I do not use the failsafe plugin so I have to real world project to test I did a brief

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

ow it is not possible because the modules are basically three: > >> > > >> > java.base == 37MB > >> > java.desktop == 36MB > >> > java.xml ==20MB > >> > > >> > All the other modules are pretty small but these three seen in >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven WAR Plugin version 3.1.0 (Take 2)

+1 (non binding) run "mvn clean install" from source zip successfully built all of my webapps running Maven with Java9 (build 9-ea+163) Thank you ! 2017-04-27 11:36 GMT+02:00 Robert Scholte : > +1 > > > On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:51:33 +0200, Karl Heinz Marbaise

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

e XStream, see > > MWAR-397[1] > > > > Just for the record, Jörg is working through the Java9 issues for XStream > presently - https://github.com/x-stream/xstream/commits/master > > - Paul > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

s Cheers Enrico > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Il mer 16 ago 2017, 02:44 Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> ha > > scritto: > > > > > Hi Enrico, > > > > > > It does not a

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

ith > > --add-modules java.se.ee > > > > If this will work for me then pls confirm that I can commit it to master. > > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> On mer 16 a

Re: Building a Java9 project just using JDK9

-- Enrico 2017-04-24 19:08 GMT+02:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de>: > Hi, > > yes I will do within this week... > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > On 23/04/17 21:37, Enrico Olivelli wrote: >> >> Thank you Robert,

Updates to Java9 Compatibility Page

Hi, I think that all the issues related to the maven-war-plugin can be set to "done", as apparently the maven-war-plugin is no more affected by the xstream Java9 issue. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+9+-+Jigsaw Maybe it would be good to report current Surefire problems

Re: JDK9: Jigsaw Problem with maven-site-plugin 3.6

nowadays are due to legacy java code which bypasses encapsulation by using setAccessible. Enrico > > > > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > On 17/06/17 16:31, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Karl, > > I think that the problem is tha code is trying to access inte

Re: JDK9: Jigsaw Problem with maven-site-plugin 3.6

rl Heinz Marbaise > > ----- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Migration of remaining plugins to Git

a single trunk that would be cloneable in a single > > command. > > > > > > This have been discussed, afaik, for the plugins already. That would > > > result in an explosion of repositories. It wasn't worthwhile. > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: JDK9: Jigsaw Problem with maven-site-plugin 3.6

ccessibleObject.java:281) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.checkCanSetAccessible(Method.java:198) at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.setAccessible(Method.java:192) at org.parboiled.transform.AsmUtils.findLoadedClass(AsmUtils.java:206) ... 72 more 2017-06-18 11:04 GMT+02:00 Enr

Re: JDK9: Jigsaw Problem with maven-site-plugin 3.6

che.maven.plugins.maven.site.plugin { > >>> requires java.io; > >>> requires java.base; > >>> } > >>> > >>> Do we have any kind of general naming convention for the plugins? > >>> > >>> Kind regards > >>> Karl Heinz Marbaise > >>> > >>> - > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >>> > >>> > >> > >> --- > >> L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le > >> logiciel antivirus Avast. > >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus > >> > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > >> > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > > -- > Cheers > Tibor > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Want to cut release Version 2.20.1 in Surefire project

> I have planned only 5 simple fixes, the most of them offered by our > contributors, in Version 2.20.2, and one important issue in 2.20.3. > > [1]: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.20.1 > > > -- > Cheers > Tibor > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20.1

+1 (non binding) run unit tests on surefire project itself on JDK 9+181 run unit tests of other Java8 projects which required java.se.ee module to be present Thank you ! Enrico 2017-09-11 5:33 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana : > Hi, > > We solved 24 issues: >

Re: [jira] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

Robert, Tibor, I agree with Robert that the tweak about adding --add-modules java.se.ee has really limited effect as I pointed out in another private email thread, actually the hack does not work with more than one forked JVM. My proposal is to drop that fix and document how to deal with changes

Re: [jira] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

2017-09-29 10:41 GMT+02:00 Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com>: > On 29/09/2017 08:57, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > >> : >> >> 2) dealing with modules like java.sql which as not in java.base ( >> http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api/java.base-summary.h

Re: Maven Surefire and JUnit 5

Sorry I wanted to reply to another message from Benedikt Enrico Il dom 1 ott 2017, 16:17 Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de> ha scritto: > Hi Enrico, > > On 01/10/17 16:00, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Benedikt, > > did you try to update all of your maven plugins to

Re: Maven Surefire and JUnit 5

t; Benedikt > > [1] https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/165 > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: maven-jdeps-plugin and JDK9 - no love :(

g the dependency for the plugin in your pom may help. Cheers Enrico Mark > -- > > "The ease with which a change can be implemented has no relevance at all > to whether it is the right change for the (Java) Platform for all time." — > Mark Reinhold. > > Mark Derricutt > http://www.theoryinpractice.net > http://www.chaliceofblood.net > http://plus.google.com/+MarkDerricutt > http://twitter.com/talios > http://facebook.com/mderricutt > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Surefire 2.21 release date ?

Hi Tibor, Do you have any plan about the release date of surefire 2.21.0 ? If you have some tasks to do I will be happy to help. Cheers Enrico

Surefire and JUnit Categories - groups in reactor

Hi, I would lke to use the categories facility with JUnit 4.12 in a reactor project, I am finding some issue, but they seem to me so basic that maybe it is only a lack of documentation or that we can provide some minor fix in order to make life easier: 1) In a reactor a would like to run mvn test

Re: Surefire at Java 9 and Java 10

fix and > > then the success can be integrated to master. > > > > On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Tibor, > >> There are IT tests which check for exaclty java.specification.version=9 > >

Re: Surefire at Java 9 and Java 10

supports Jigsaw already now in origin/master. > > There are more important two or three bugs when Docker build crashes and > this has to be fixed till 2.21.0 as well. > > Cheers > Tibor > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.4

+1 (non binding) checked signatures and hash of staged artifacts I have used the staged binary artifacts to build a bunch of projects on Linux (Fedora 26), all ok We could also consider not to deliver md5 hash anymore ( https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html) Enrico Il giorno dom 17

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven Surefire Plugin 2.22.0 Released

cking time of JVM >- [SUREFIRE-1504 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1504>] >- switch from Git-WIP to Gitbox >- [SUREFIRE-1510 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1510>] >- Jenkins CI fails due to performance of Windows break concurrency of >forked JVMs >- [SUREFIRE-1518 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1518>] >- Upgrade version of plexus-java to 0.9.8 > > > Enjoy, > > -The Apache Maven team > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.4

Il lun 18 giu 2018, 11:24 Stephen Connolly ha scritto: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 at 10:02, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > checked signatures and hash of staged artifacts > > I have used the staged binary artifacts to build a bunch of projects on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.22.0

+1 (non binding) sha1 okay built from source tested with a few projects on Linux verified the issue SUREFIRE-1498 reported by me has been fixed in this RC and great to see Native support for JUnit 5 Cheers Enrico Il giorno mer 13 giu 2018 alle ore 15:43 Stephane Nicoll <

Surefire 2.21 release date ?

(resending) Hi Tibor, Do you have any plan about the release date of surefire 2.21.0 ? If you have some tasks to do I will be happy to help. Cheers Enrico

Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

UnicodeTestNamesIT and > JaCoCO (SUREFIRE-1455). > I can pick one on these, just tell me which is the best Then all ITs setup with JDK 9. > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > (resending) > > > > Hi Tibor,

Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

which are already in progress: UnicodeTestNamesIT and > JaCoCO (SUREFIRE-1455). > Then all ITs setup with JDK 9. > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > (resending) > > > > Hi Tibor, > > Do you have any pl

Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>: > > > 2018-01-16 21:26 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>: > >> >> >> Il gio 11 gen 2018, 22:26 Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> ha >> scritto: >> >>> I was busy at

Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

testing JDK 7, 8, 9, 10 on Linux > and > > Windows and Maven 3.2 - 3.5. > > > > [1]: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven- > > surefire-pipeline/job/SUREFIRE-1463/ > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/blob/SUREFIRE- > > 1463/Jenkin

Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

sion that support which JDK > > > > where is the page? > Is it this one? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+9+-+Jigsaw Enrico > > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > > As jdk10 is very soon. I'm happy to release surefire

Re: Broken surefire defaults?

clever? > Hi with upcoming 2.21, hopefully released very soon, it will work as expected, it won't add java.ee.se module. In the meantime you can add -Dxx='--add-modules' to surefire argLine parameter and surefire won't add any module. Surefire 2.21 will also habdle module-path properly Cheers Enrico > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Surefire roadmap

hope we will make the release soon! >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> I still do not understand what codeline you run and why you have >>>>>>> > problems >>>>>>> > >> with runtime if I did no

Re: Working with branches related to issue - Simplyfying work Part II

> > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Compiler Plugin version 3.7.1

Tests ok: - built from source with Oracle JDK8 and Oracle JDK10 on Fedora 26, all tests passed. - Apache RAT ok Unfortunately I guess I should give a -1 (non-binding) because my GPG reports that the key used for signing has expired gpg: assuming signed data in

Re: Working with branches related to issue - Simplyfying work

; Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

2018-01-16 21:26 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>: > > > Il gio 11 gen 2018, 22:26 Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> ha > scritto: > >> I was busy at work but now I am free. >> I need to have a help with investigating a bug >> https:

Re: What about starting a Slack Channel for Maven Dev Community ?

open to the public Enrico Il mer 28 feb 2018, 13:39 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > 2018-02-28 13:30 GMT+01:00 Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>: > >> It looks the bookkeeper is not using the official Apache slack. >> >> Please

Re: Surefire roadmap

what we accept and strict in what we produce > > >> >> >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65475/valid-characters-in-a-java-class-name >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11774099/legal-identifiers-in-java >> https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/

Re: [HELP WANTED] last modifications before Maven Archetypes release

. Enrico > > Regards, > > Hervé > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20.1

2018-03-09 9:55 GMT+01:00 Tibor Digana : > Hi Enrico, Karl, Herve, > > We reported the issues [1] found during the Vote. They are fixed in > branches [2] and CI builds [3]. > We can make a code review. > Additionally, we fixed SUREFIRE-1490 which was in progress but we did

Re: Bug in processing surefire/failsafe groups

the ASF > > parent POM 19, which turns out to be 2.20.1. Version 2.21.0 seems to fix > > the problem. Thanks! > > > > Tibor: No, I didn't get previous email. The Maven lists are too spammy > for > > me to subscribe. That could be the reason. Please CC me if foll

Re: [ANN] Release Maven Help Plugin 3.0.1 released

dency upgrade > * [MPH-136] - Upgrade JDOM to 1.1.3 > > > Enjoy, > > -The Apache Maven team > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: code review for surefire 3.0.0-M1

I will be happy to take a look soon Cheers Enrico 2018-03-27 18:33 GMT+02:00 Tibor Digana : > We can make a review of the branch "1506" of the issue [1]. There I am just > trying to find our what's wrong with JDK10 [2], [3]. There are few open > tickets [4]. > > [1]:

Re: Bug in processing surefire/failsafe groups

> > `-Dgroups=org.apache.project.package.subpackage.testing. > > categories.MyGroup`. > > If groups could be specified as patterns, it would be more obvious that a > > CNFE could not occur... if a pattern didn't match any classes, then it > > wouldn't result in a CNFE... it would simply return an empty set. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Christopher > > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Add permissions to close Pull Requests in ASF projects at GitHub

l: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: surefire-junit47 depends on dummy:dummy:jar:1.0?

ire seems to > need? I don't see it in mvnrepository nor in repo.maven.apache.org. > > I'm using 2.19.1 of the surefire plugin. I added the following changes to > the plugin config and now it's complaining about artifact resolution > > classesAndMethods4 > > > Where ca

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20.1

ase.zip sha1: 6927024eefa0b8c80dee70efa014f1 > >> f421d7844b > >> > >> Staging site: > >> http://maven.apache.org/surefire-archives/surefire-LATEST/ > >> > >> Guide to testing staged releases: > >> http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html > >> > >> Vote open for 72 hours. > >> > >> [ ] +1 > >> [ ] +0 > >> [ ] -1 > >> > >> Cheers > >> Tibor > >> > > > > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20.1

//maven.apache.org/surefire-archives/surefire-LATEST/ > > > > Guide to testing staged releases: > > http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html > > > > Vote open for 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 > > > > Cheers > > Tibor > > > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Surefire release?

; > pipes and I found a bug in JDK in maven-shared-utils. We have some > > > > prototype with sockets but pipes must stay as an config alternative. > > This > > > > includes changes in the data format sent over pipes and sockets which > > is > > > on > > > > my PC and not in any public branch. With this fix we will close all > > known > > > > critical Jiras. > > > > I could not do it earlier, sorry. There's been a quite a lot of > > > > requirements so far from Users and us ASF. > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Tibor > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:14 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > Any objections to cut a release? > > > > > If not, I can do this early next week > > > > > Cheers > > > > > -- > > > > > Olivier Lamy > > > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Olivier Lamy > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > > > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Surefire release?

Il ven 2 mar 2018, 19:43 Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> ha scritto: > I will close the Jira Version and I will complete all preparation for the > release vote tomorrow morning. > Great! Enrico > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:02 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.c

Re: Surefire release?

un the build with other JDK and follow the > README.md on GitHub? > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:16 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Il ven 2 mar 2018, 19:43 Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> ha > scritto: > > > > > I

Re: Surefire roadmap

elps Enrico 2018-02-25 23:25 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>: > > > Il dom 25 feb 2018, 21:45 Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> ha > scritto: > >> Hi Enrico, >> >> Sorry for notifying. >> I would like to ask you for

What about starting a Slack Channel for Maven Dev Community ?

Hi, At Apache BookKeeper we are using a Slack channel as 'chat' and it is working very well. it is more useful that IRC, messages are persistent, there are email notifications, mentions Did you ever evaluated starting a Slack Channel for Maven community ? ASF provides support and a

Re: What about starting a Slack Channel for Maven Dev Community ?

2018-02-28 13:25 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>: > Olivier, > I am subscribed to the ASF slack channel since you have created it, my id > is eolivelliù > No sorry, not the maven one > > :-) > > Enrico > > 2018-02-28 13:20 GMT+01:00

Re: What about starting a Slack Channel for Maven Dev Community ?

rit : > > > Hi, > > I started a channel mid october in the asf slack but it looks I'm the > only > > one using it :-) > > > > > > > > On 28 February 2018 at 19:45, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Hi, &

Re: What about starting a Slack Channel for Maven Dev Community ?

2018-02-28 13:25 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>: > > > 2018-02-28 13:25 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>: > >> Olivier, >> I am subscribed to the ASF slack channel since you have created it, my id >> is eolivelliù >

Re: What about starting a Slack Channel for Maven Dev Community ?

e is an asf slack ?! > > > > Le mer. 28 févr. 2018 à 13:01, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> a écrit : > > > > > Hi, > > > I started a channel mid october in the asf slack but it looks I'm the > > only > > > one using it :-) >

Re: What about starting a Slack Channel for Maven Dev Community ?

separate. Thank you Enrico > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 at 10:27 pm, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > 2018-02-28 13:25 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > 2018-02-28 13:25 GMT+01:00 Enrico Ol

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.21.0

Great Thank you Enrico Il mar 6 mar 2018, 14:32 Tibor Digana <tibordig...@apache.org> ha scritto: > Hi, > > The vote has passed with the following result: > > +1 : Stephane Nicoll, Robert Scholte, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Olivier Lamy, > Enrico Olivelli, Hervé BOUTEMY, Tibor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.22.1

/blob/master/pom.xml#L605 > > Why does check fail and how did the 2.22.0 release handle the issue? > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 10:53 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > Seems that apache-rat:check fails with: > > > > Files with unapproved licenses: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.22.1

Seems that apache-rat:check fails with: Files with unapproved licenses: .travis.yml I guess this could be a blocker for the release Enrico Il giorno lun 8 ott 2018 alle ore 10:22 Tibor Digana ha scritto: > > Hi, > > We solved 17 issues: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.22.1

Il lun 8 ott 2018, 15:09 Tibor Digana ha scritto: > Please don't run it like that. > See README file, just *run mvn install -P run-its* > Sure. My concern is about running RAT Enrico > > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 12:48 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > I just d

Testing Release Candidates

Hi, I would like to test Maven Plugins Release Candidates. I know there is a brief guide https://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html But I think this is not very complete and/or it is outdated. The summary of the guide is to run mvn verify For instance this is not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.6.0

t;> sha512: > c5794a6723d8d0fc8ff447b42e5a8c13524a44f8508a305d463f811c8039c7e9166d709077c8373d3cf980ce24feaebb2431cb50fb274933ab3bc2a90355 > Git tag: > >>> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git;a=commit;h=97c98ec64a1fdfee7767ce5ffb20918da4f719f3 > Staging site: > >>> https://maven.apache.org/components/ref/3-LATEST/ > >>> Vote open for 72 hours. > >>> [ ] +1 > >>> [ ] +0 > >>> [ ] -1 > >>> Kind regards > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 3.0.0-M1 - TAKE 2

d > > > > > > Staging site: > > > http://maven.apache.org/surefire-archives/surefire-LATEST/ > > > > > > Guide to testing staged releases: > > > http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html > > > > > > Vote open for 72 hours. > > > > > > [ ] +1 > > > [ ] +0 > > > [ ] -1 > > > > > > Cheers > > > Tibor > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: SIte plugin 1.8 required

ull Requests makes review simpler Cheers Enrico > > -- > Olivier Lamy > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Testing Release Candidates

Karl, some answers inline, thank you for answers Il ven 12 ott 2018, 16:28 Karl Heinz Marbaise ha scritto: > Hi Enrico, > > > On 12/10/18 10:36, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to test Maven Plugins Release Candidates. > > Great that you like to h

Re: I am wandering how you do guys debug maven?

's classes by > > ClassWorlds. Which means it doesn't have "main method". instead we debug > > everything by log, do we have other way like debug with any IDE: Eclipse, > > Intellij etc. put breakpoints and debug step by step ? > > > > Thanks > > > > Simon(ChengHong) Sheng > > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.22.1

+1 (non-binding) - Built from source zip RC on Oracle JDK8 - Run tests of several projects on OpenJDK11 using artifacts rebuild from the ZIP - Sha SUMs ok on the source zip I have tried to run integration tests from the ZIP but without success, this seems due to local problems to my box, so not

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven Shade Plugin Version 3.2.0 Released

gt; > * [MSHADE-293] - Require Java 7 > > > > Dependency upgrades: > > > > * [MSHADE-294] - Upgrade maven-plugins parent to version 32 > > * [MSHADE-296] - Upgrade maven-artifact-transfer 0.10.0 > > > > Enjoy > > > > - The Apache Maven team > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven Shade Plugin Version 3.2.0 Released

error I get: > >> > > > >> > > org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Error in ASM > >> processing > >> > > class org/test/A/ext/StateExtension.class: This feature requires > ASM7 > >> -> > >> > > [Help

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven Shade Plugin Version 3.2.0 Released

Oct 10, 2018 at 2:01 PM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > You can override the dependency on asm inside the plugin configuration if > > it is only a matter for upgrade > > This should work and unblock you > > Enrico > > > > Il mer 10 ott 2018, 16:17 Yuri d

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven Shade Plugin Version 3.2.0 Released

; com.google.common > shaded.com.google.common > > > > > > > package > > shade >

Re: [maven-integration-testing] 01/01: [MNG-5667] Either install or deploy

require documentation. > > thanks, > Robert > > ps. good to see that people are paying attention to the commits and > review > them! > > > On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 20:53:26 +0200, Enrico Olivelli > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > I can't see any flag

Re: Second MNG-6415

che.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git;a=commit;h=7c1e7129b12973769f49cd946236e43f4bd17d51 > > > > > > JENKINS: https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-box/job/maven/job/MNG-6415/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: [maven-integration-testing] 01/01: [MNG-5667] Either install or deploy

ge( "(,2.2.0)" ) ) > { > verifier.assertFilePresent( > "target/plugin-update-registry.txt" ); > diff --git > a/core-it-suite/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/it/MavenIT0144LifecycleExecutionOrderTest.java > b/core-it-suite/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/it/MavenIT0144LifecycleExecutionOrderTest.java > index cedd8d5..5358233 100644 > --- > a/core-it-suite/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/it/MavenIT0144LifecycleExecutionOrderTest.java > +++ > b/core-it-suite/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/it/MavenIT0144LifecycleExecutionOrderTest.java > @@ -95,7 +95,11 @@ public class MavenIT0144LifecycleExecutionOrderTest > expected.add( "post-integration-test" ); > } > expected.add( "verify" ); > -expected.add( "install" ); > +if ( matchesVersionRange( "(,3.6.0)" ) ) > +{ > +// MNG-5667 > +expected.add( "install" ); > +} > expected.add( "deploy" ); > > expected.add( "pre-site" ); > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: New Committers - community

gure) In the Jenkins of my company in a "Multibranch Pipeline" I have a "Branch Sources" box with a "GitHub" option which lets me trigger builds by using PRs Enrico Il giorno sab 29 dic 2018 alle ore 13:43 Hervé BOUTEMY ha scritto: > > Le samedi 29 décembre 20

Re: Building Javadocs and site on CI

Karl, Il giorno sab 29 dic 2018 alle ore 09:41 Karl Heinz Marbaise ha scritto: > > Hi Enrico, > > On 29/12/18 09:14, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I am trying to release Maven Assembly Plugin and I see that there are > > a few showstoppers due t

Re: New Committers - community

mmiter to add a comment like 'test this please' in order to start the build and have immediate feedback on github Enrico > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marb aise > > ----- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: New Committers - community

gt; > On Sat 29 Dec 2018 at 13:10, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > > Hervè, > > This is the plugin > > > > > https://wiki.jenkins.io/display/JENKINS/GitHub+Branch+Source+Plugin?desktop=true=unmigrated-inline-wiki-markup > > > > I see our "maven-box"

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Assembly Plugin version 3.1.1

/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html Vote open for at least 72 hours. [ ] +1 [ ] +0 [ ] -1 Kind Regards Enrico Olivelli - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h

Re: New Committers - community

Zookeeper and Bookkeeper and github pr plugin works like a charm (and I partecipated in setting it up) Enrico > Any idea how we could have GitHub PR reviews without this branch creation > > by > > committers, be it at ASF or somewhere else? > > > > Using TravisCI could be a solution. > -- -- Enrico Olivelli

Re: New Committers - community

Il sab 29 dic 2018, 17:25 Stephen Connolly ha scritto: > On Sat 29 Dec 2018 at 16:20, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat 29 Dec 2018 at 15:18, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > > > >> Il sab 29 dic 201

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >