+1 for keeping it in Mesos repo and rewrite it in C++.
Also, do we need a CLI work group on this?
Thanks & Best Wishes,
Tom Xing(邢舟)
Emerging Technology Institute, IBM China Software Development Lab
--
IBM China Software Development Laboratory (CSDL)
Notes ID:Zhou Z
+1 for keeping it in the repo.
We can establish maintainers for the CLI to ensure that it can maintain a
reasonable update cadence. Note that we haven't done this well for the
webui and CLI, so we need to make sure we do it better this time around.
If the architecture allows for easy integration
Moving this to a new thread (see some context below).
It may be worth exploring adding a generic mechanism for doing label-based
injection of volumes: if a container is tagged with a particular label, we
will inject a particular volume into the container.
For Nvidia GPU containers, the operator
As an FYI, preliminary support to work around this issue for GPUs will
appear in the 1.0 release
https://reviews.apache.org/r/48914/
This doesn't solve the problem of scarce resources in general, but it
will at least keep non-GPU workloads from starving out GPU-based
workloads on GPU capable
Thanks, looking forward to discussion and review on your document. The main use
case I see here is that some of our frameworks will want to request the GPU
resources, and we want to make sure that those frameworks are able to
successfully launch tasks on agents with those resources. We want to
+1 to in repo
C++ would be nice to maintain language parity, GO would be a great choice
also
-Jake
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Vinod Kone wrote:
> +1 for keeping it in repo.
>
> Would be nice if the CLI can be written entirely in C++ though, to avoid
> supporting
+1 for keeping it in repo.
Would be nice if the CLI can be written entirely in C++ though, to avoid
supporting more languages.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Jie Yu wrote:
> I personally prefer it being part of the Mesos repo so that when people
> install our package,
I personally prefer it being part of the Mesos repo so that when people
install our package, they'll get the command line tools as well. That also
avoids the potential version mismatch between Mesos and CLI (as you
mentioned).
What does others think?
- Jie
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:20 AM,
There are still 8 outstanding issues, including 1 blocker. We are waiting
for these to land for RC2.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Vinod Kone wrote:
> We still have 12 issues, including 1 blocker, targeted for 1.0.
>
> Dashboard:
I've created an Epic to track this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5676
There have been efforts on this that have failed in the past (e.g.
https://github.com/mesosphere/mesos-cli)
I'm curious what people's thoughts are in terms of keeping the CLI
integrated into mesos itself vs.
Yeah, sound as a good option.
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 at 20:04 Cosmin Lehene wrote:
> Looks like there's a majority of +1 for Slack, so this this may be
> pointless, however :), have you considered gitter.im (
> https://gitter.im/home/explore/)?
>
>
> It has similar capabilities
+1 if no one is relying on the old behavior.
Jiang Yan Xu
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Jie Yu wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Currently, the ownership of the persistent volumes are set to be the same
> as the sandbox. In the implementation, we call `chown -R` on the
Currently the volume is owned by say framework user A when a CREATE is done.
When a task is launched, the ownership of the volume is changed recursively to
say user B, which means the root directory and all of its content has now
ownership of user B. This enables user B to write into this
Hi;
I’ve managed to solve it, the tar file for 0.28.0 is broken, incomplete, I
hand’t noticed that, so I tried downloading 28.2. This has worked perfectly.
Many thanks
Ali.
On 21 Jun 2016, at 13:55, José Guilherme Vanz wrote:
> Do you ensure that all dependencies
Can you post the content of "config.log"?
Thanks,
Neil
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Ali Aktar wrote:
> Hi;
>
> All dependencies as per doc were installed. I’m using Centos 7:
> Linux ip-172-31-46-249.eu-west-1.compute.internal 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64
> #1 SMP
Hi;
All dependencies as per doc were installed. I’m using Centos 7:
Linux ip-172-31-46-249.eu-west-1.compute.internal 3.10.0-327.10.1.el7.x86_64 #1
SMP Tue Feb 16 17:03:50 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core)
Thanks
Ali.
On 21 Jun 2016, at 13:55, José
Do you ensure that all dependencies described here:
http://mesos.apache.org/documentation/latest/getting-started/ are
installed? Furthermore, which Linux flavour are you using?
Thanks
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 at 09:22 Ali Aktar wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Can someone please help, I’m
Hi;
Can someone please help, I’m getting the following errors while running
./configure:
[root@ip-172-31-46-249 build]# ../configure --prefix=/mnt/s3mnt/mesos
--exec-prefix=/mnt/s3mnt/mesos --datadir=/mnt/s3mnt/mesos
checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking host system
For the case where a container drops down in privileges and still wants to
create a new file, this will result in an error if it is at the root of the
persistent volume right?
Is the recommended pattern then to always create a stub directory at the
root of the persistent volume, and then launch
As you said, you agents are outside the network, so you need
```
sudo ./bin/mesos-agent.sh --master=129.114.110.26:5050
```
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:23 AM, Pankaj Saha wrote:
> Hi I am using a command like below:
>
> sudo ./bin/mesos-master.sh --ip=10.50.0.26
Hi folks,
Currently, the ownership of the persistent volumes are set to be the same
as the sandbox. In the implementation, we call `chown -R` on the persistent
volume to match that of the sandbox each time before we mount it into the
container.
Recently, we realized that this behavior is not
21 matches
Mail list logo