v1 API is not yet declared stable, so we can make changes before 1.0.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Tuan-Anh Hoang-Vu
wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> Yes! That will also works! My only concern is will this break backward
> compatibility?
> Would this be something worth pushing
Hi Vinod,
Yes! That will also works! My only concern is will this break backward
compatibility?
Would this be something worth pushing upstream?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Vinod Kone wrote:
> I was thinking more along the lines of :
>
> ```
> GetMetrics {
>
>Docker engine to create a Docker container as the task and set the
resources of that container more than task's resources?
As I known, we could not avoid this so far.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Qian Zhang wrote:
> @Vinod, what if the executor talks to Docker engine
Just wanted to highlight two tickets that would be of great help to the
community.
(1) The first is to publish documentation on the website for each release.
We currently publish periodically off of master, and so it's a pain for
users because the documentation does not reflect the version they
@Vinod, what if the executor talks to Docker engine to create a Docker
container as the task and set the resources of that container more than
task's resources? Will we guard this?
Thanks,
Qian Zhang
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Vinod Kone wrote:
> A task doesn't get
I was thinking more along the lines of :
```
GetMetrics {
repeated Metric gauges = 1;
repeated Metric counters = 2;
}
```
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Tuan-Anh Hoang-Vu
wrote:
> Timer will simply measure the amount of time it takes (in ns) for an
> operation.
>
>
Timer will simply measure the amount of time it takes (in ns) for an
operation.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> What is the timer type? Is it effectively a special case of a histogram?
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Tuan-Anh Hoang-Vu
What is the timer type? Is it effectively a special case of a histogram?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Tuan-Anh Hoang-Vu
wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> We used an in-house metrics system, which is basically a time-series
> database.
> I don't know in details about the metrics
Hi Vinod,
I checked the corresponding master code [1] and also the v1 api response
for GET_METRICS call.
Do you suggest adding another field called `type` or something into the
result, so instead of
{
"name": "master/cpus_total",
"value": 0.0
}
we have
{
"name":
Hi Benjamin,
We used an in-house metrics system, which is basically a time-series
database.
I don't know in details about the metrics system, but the collection client
required me to specify metric type, probably for optimization purpose. It
accepts 3 different types: counter, gauge and timer
On
We can definitely distinguish counters and gauges in the upcoming v1 API.
https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/include/mesos/v1/master/master.proto#L265
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Benjamin Mahler wrote:
> It's worth doing because it has come up before [1]
A task doesn't get its own cgroup because task was supposed to represent a
unit of work. That unit of work doesn't have to be necessarily done via a
unix process or container. For example, the executor might realize a task
as a thread!
That said, we did talk about providing an API for executors
It's worth doing because it has come up before [1] [2]. For our own
education, in your case why is the metrics collection system interested in
the type? Is it for optimization? Which metrics collection system are you
using?
What are the types that the metrics collection system understands? The
Great. Can you send a PR adding yourself to
https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/docs/contributors.yaml ?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Philip Winder
wrote:
> Hi,
> Could you add me as a contributor. I would like to add a PR for improved
> documentation for
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/mesos/pull/115
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hi,
Could you add me as a contributor. I would like to add a PR for improved
documentation for this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5702
Phil
GitHub user xiaods opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/mesos/pull/115
Added xiaods as contributor.
The contributors.yaml has been updated adding myself as contributor
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/mesos/pull/114
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user haosdent commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/mesos/pull/114
haha, you could ignore travis, it always failed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user jvanz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/mesos/pull/114
How is it possible? I've updated the contributors.yaml only. xD
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user mesosprbot opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/mesos/pull/113
Added a file to test PR notifications.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/artemharutyunyan/mesos master
Alternatively you can
GitHub user jvanz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/mesos/pull/114
Added jvanz as contributor.
The contributors.yaml has been updated adding myself as contributor
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Hi Vinod,
Yes, my metric collection system need to distinguish between different
metrics.
Currently we hard coded all metric types into our system, but it's not very
scalable and error prone.
For example I recently discovered that we misclassified `timestamp` as
gauge instead of counter.
On Mon,
Hey Tuan. Can I ask what you are trying to accomplish here? Does your
metric collection system need to distinguish between different metrics?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Tuan-Anh Hoang-Vu
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am planning to extend current metrics endpoint
Hi Hans,
If you delay, and then the lambda that you schedule is a `defer` on to the
same process, then this accomplishes what you want.
The one caveat is that other functions may be invoked on your actor process
in the mean time.
—
*Joris Van Remoortere*
Mesosphere
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:14
Hi,
Is there a way to sleep a libprocess-process ? Or at least some construct to
stop for a specific amount of time in the middle of a method, which is member
of a Process, but giving opportunity to other processes to handle their
messages during that sleep.
stout::os::sleep simply stops
To close the loop on this one :
With Steve Niemitz's help, I resolved the issue, kafka-scheduler was going
to wrong master and the slave it was going to returned a
/master/status.json which did not have any information about the registered
slaves.
"slaves":[
],
What did I do?
1.
Hi all,
NOTE: This will be the last supported point release for 0.26.x.
The vote for Mesos 0.26.2 (rc1) has passed with the
following votes.
+1 (Binding)
--
Vinod Kone
Kapil Arya
Benjamin Mahler
+1 (Non-binding)
--
There were no 0 or -1
Hello,
I am planning to extend current metrics endpoint (/metrics/snapshot) to only
return a specific type of metrics (either counter, gauge or timer). It
would be great if I
can get feedback from you if this is worth pursuing, or there is an
existing solution,
or my implementation plan is sound.
The same is true with all frameworks I've used, such as Marathon - each
executor manages one task (although it can have multiple "runs").
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:49 AM haosdent wrote:
> Hi, @Dave If you use mesos-executor or mesos-docker-executor. It only would
> launch
Travis CI should be disabled and you could ignore its result now. Refer to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5655
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:57 AM, José Guilherme Vanz <
guilherme@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello folks
>
> As I can see, all build done by travis CI server are failing. I
Hi,
I'm currently familiarizing myself with the Mesos source code and have a
conceptual question about executors, tasks and the containerizer.
Basically, each executor gets its own container (and thus its own cgroup
subtree ".../mesos/executor0" when using cgroup isolation). This achieves
32 matches
Mail list logo