Re: facelets taglib for tomahawk and sandbox

2007-10-23 Thread Bruno Aranda
I did start with the implementation of tomahawk using the faces plugin (not the old generator that Mario may be refering). The efforts are done in a tomahawk branch, but due to lack of time I haven't got the time to continue (I hope to do so :)). Configuring the maven-faces-plugin to do something,

Re: facelets taglib for tomahawk and sandbox

2007-10-23 Thread Bruno Aranda
On 22/10/2007, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are already tomahawk-facelets.jar files out there if you want to use something with drop-in support. See the wiki page for a link to Bruno's http://code.google.com/p/tomahawk-facelets project. Yes, I decided to make available

[OT] Orchestra demos...

2007-10-23 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, Thomas Spiegl added a demo of Orchestra+JPA(Hibernate)+Tomahawk (see [1]). I updated my Trinidad FacesGoodies to use Orchestra and JPA (OpenJPA) (see [2]). -Matthias PS: You need to build Orchestra first on your own... [1] http://facesgoodies.googlecode.com/svn/orchestra/trunk/ [2]

Re: [orchestra] ViewController design

2007-10-23 Thread Mario Ivankovits
hi, I am not aware that the shale vc has something like a configuration. Doesn't it just use the viewId mapping? Well, I can live with an extra configuration, but then, we should have a look how the shale dialog scxml fits in here - just that any eventual adaption of shale dialog in the

Re: [orchestra] ViewController design

2007-10-23 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I think Simon was talking about the dialog config, where a flow is configured. The entry of the flow is responsible to start conversation, etc On 10/23/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, I am not aware that the shale vc has something like a configuration. Doesn't it just use

Re: facelets taglib for tomahawk and sandbox

2007-10-23 Thread Sochor Zdeněk
Hi, a year ago i was playing with OLD generator to make it work again for Tomahawk's core components - see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-819 - attachment tomahawk(no roleSelectionMode).patch I withdrove the issue mainly because it become invalid in a matter of weeks AND in

[jira] Created: (MYFACES-1750) Evaluation of EL-Expression fails with custom PropertyResolver

2007-10-23 Thread Stefan Rinke (JIRA)
Evaluation of EL-Expression fails with custom PropertyResolver -- Key: MYFACES-1750 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1750 Project: MyFaces Core Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (TRINIDAD-771) returnListener from a commandButton is broken in a table facet

2007-10-23 Thread Max Starets (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12535940 ] mstarets edited comment on TRINIDAD-771 at 10/23/07 7:14 AM: For now, we should

RE: JSF 2.0 is already finished

2007-10-23 Thread Kito D. Mann
Wow, I missed that one! I suppose the rest of the EG has been keeping me in the dark.. I sent them an e-mail... ~~~ Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action http://www.virtua.com - JSF/Java EE consulting, training, and

Re: [jira] Updated: (TRINIDAD-134) StateManagerImpl is not fully compatible with JSR-301

2007-10-23 Thread Michael Freedman
As Scott has pointed out, JSR-301 had to make some difficult choices here because of the lack of flexibility in JSF 1.2. We wanted where ever possible to have the JSF artifact running in a portlet environment to run in a NamingContainer that took the portlet namespace id into account

[jira] Resolved: (TRINIDAD-777) Lightweight dialogs sometimes rendered such that top is off the page

2007-10-23 Thread Danny Robinson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Danny Robinson resolved TRINIDAD-777. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.0.4-core Assignee: Danny Robinson

[jira] Resolved: (TRINIDAD-757) partialTriggers Contract Fails if direct parent component is not a NamingContainer

2007-10-23 Thread Jeanne Waldman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-757?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeanne Waldman resolved TRINIDAD-757. - Resolution: Fixed changed documentation, demo, and RequestContextImpl.java Completed:

[jira] Created: (TOBAGO-518) A Wizard-Tag to create dynamic wizard pages with low effort

2007-10-23 Thread Udo Schnurpfeil (JIRA)
A Wizard-Tag to create dynamic wizard pages with low effort --- Key: TOBAGO-518 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-518 Project: MyFaces Tobago Issue Type: New Feature

Re: facelets taglib for tomahawk and sandbox

2007-10-23 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! Please consider adding the following handler for the AliasBean to your project: (This is my first Tag-Handler, so I am not sure if there is a more elegant way - at least the AliasBean works here now) import com.sun.facelets.FaceletContext; import com.sun.facelets.FaceletException; import

Re: facelets taglib for tomahawk and sandbox

2007-10-23 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Hey Mario, The reason that there is no alias bean handler is because it's not needed with facelets. Instead you'd use a Facelets composition and ui:include statement. On 10/23/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Please consider adding the following handler for the AliasBean to

Re: facelets taglib for tomahawk and sandbox

2007-10-23 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! The reason that there is no alias bean handler is because it's not needed with facelets. Still, the tag is not working as it should, so providing a tag handler will fix this. Instead you'd use a Facelets composition and ui:include statement. That is not true for my use-case. As you

Re: facelets taglib for tomahawk and sandbox

2007-10-23 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Wow. No, I somehow missed the relevence of aliasBean on the facelets mailing list. For what it's worth, you're the first person in the history of facelets to need it, at least as far as I've read on mailing lists. Would it maybe be better to create a rendertime-compatible version of ui:include

Re: [PORTAL] JSR-301 Portlet Bridge has cleared incubator list

2007-10-23 Thread Manfred Geiler
I can do it on Thursday. Matthias, if you are able to spend some time earlier, then: please, thanks. -Manfred On 10/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, let Manfred do it. If he is to busy, I'll do it... -M On 10/22/07, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So who

Re: facelets taglib for tomahawk and sandbox

2007-10-23 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! For what it's worth, you're the first person in the history of facelets to need it, at least as far as I've read on mailing lists. Yep, sometimes I have some strange ideas :-) Would it maybe be better to create a rendertime-compatible version of ui:include tag? That is what I have

Re: facelets taglib for tomahawk and sandbox

2007-10-23 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Hey Mario, Thanks for keeping me honest :-) You've been correcting a number of my misconceptions recently :-) I went back and reread your facelets thread, and it does appear to be a good dynamic ui:include. Why not use ui:param instead of f:param? ui:param is already defined for facelets. On

Re: [jira] Updated: (TRINIDAD-134) StateManagerImpl is not fully compatible with JSR-301

2007-10-23 Thread Scott O'Bryan
That is, of course, unless you want to implement your own ViewRoot according to the JSR-301 spec which is certainly a possibility. Scott Michael Freedman wrote: As Scott has pointed out, JSR-301 had to make some difficult choices here because of the lack of flexibility in JSF 1.2. We wanted

Re: facelets taglib for tomahawk and sandbox

2007-10-23 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! I went back and reread your facelets thread, and it does appear to be a good dynamic ui:include. Why not use ui:param instead of f:param? ui:param is already defined for facelets. Thanks for the tip. I am not that familiar with facelets yet, at all just 3 days :-(, I'll look into this

Re: JSF 2.0 is already finished

2007-10-23 Thread Werner Punz
Dennis Byrne schrieb: Caucho claims to have implemented and released JSF 2.0 [1] before the spec was finished! huh, I thought they dont even have a fully working jee5 spec ;-) I assume they mean jsf 1.2 Cheers Werner

[jira] Updated: (TRINIDAD-666) Make ExternalContextUtils part of the public API

2007-10-23 Thread Scott O'Bryan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott O'Bryan updated TRINIDAD-666: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Make ExternalContextUtils part of the public API

[jira] Commented: (TRINIDAD-134) StateManagerImpl is not fully compatible with JSR-301

2007-10-23 Thread Scott O'Bryan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12537174 ] Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-134: This is a 1.2 only patch. Can we get this into 1.2.3 before it