Thanks for explaining viewpool and viewstate. I will go through the code later
and understand.
I was wondering what happens when state saving method param is not set. I got
your point it that the state saving algorithm is performed and when its not
mentioned whether it state saving method is
Hi
If no state saving is set, the default is server. As I said before, the
component tree and the calculated state are two different things and there
is not any relationship. Really the separation of these two concepts and
the introduction of a view pool as an effective way to keep memory usage
Cool leo! Thanks for your effort :)
2013/12/13 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
Hi
Finally the code for View Pooling has been comitted. After some
performance
tests with the know demo application, it has been confirmed the following
improvements:
- A reduction of 25% of the transient
Not bad +1 for view pool.
When VIEW_POOL_ENABLED the param
org.apache.myfaces.NUMBER_OF_SEQUENTIAL_VIEWS_IN_SESSION is not considered and
not required to set.
org.apache.myfaces.NUMBER_OF_SEQUENTIAL_VIEWS_IN_SESSION is valid for state
saving client/server.
Regards,
Dora Rajappan.
On
Hi
2013/12/13 Dora Rajappan dorarajap...@yahoo.com
Not bad +1 for view pool.
When VIEW_POOL_ENABLED the param
org.apache.myfaces.NUMBER_OF_SEQUENTIAL_VIEWS_IN_SESSIONhttp://myfaces.apache.org/core21/myfaces-impl/webconfig.html#org_apache_myfaces_NUMBER_OF_SEQUENTIAL_VIEWS_IN_SESSION
is
Hi Leonardo,
Thanks for explaining that the statemanagementstrategy is unaffected by the
view pooling.
When views are not transient and view pool enabled with no state saving or
serialisation enabled, the view pool processing remain the same and the state
is saved in session.
Regards
Hi
... When views are not transient and view pool enabled with no state
saving or serialisation enabled ...
I don't get anything about what you mean. But I understand that the topic
of state management is really, really complex, and has been a misunderstood
problem for years in the world of web
Hi
Finally the code for View Pooling has been comitted. After some performance
tests with the know demo application, it has been confirmed the following
improvements:
- A reduction of 25% of the transient memory used, which means a lot less
memory is used and it is used at a slower pace. It also
Hi Leo,
sounds fine! thanks :)
2013/12/9 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
Hi
I think we could add it as a parameter for f:view tag, for example call it
oamEnableViewPool. The patch proposed uses already an attribute for disable
the pool in some cases, but after doing some experiments
Hi
It seems we have an inconsistency between what was proposed to enable the
view pool and the inclusion of the new parameter.
At start we have this:
org.apache.myfaces.VIEW_POOL_ENABLED (enable / disable for all pages in the
app, by default false)
But if we use an attribute in f:view like
Hi Leo,
a attribute for the viewroot sound greats. +1.
How would you set this attribute then?
Setting the attribute should only be required one time - so maybe a
PhaseListener isn't the best place.
Regards,
Thomas
2013/12/7 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
Hi Thomas
What I can do is use an
Hi
I think we could add it as a parameter for f:view tag, for example call it
oamEnableViewPool. The patch proposed uses already an attribute for disable
the pool in some cases, but after doing some experiments (MYFACES-3831) I
have found we need to change some parts of the algorithm.
Leo, one question:
Is it possible to mark a view as poolable via code?
We configure all our views via typesafe view config from CODI/DS
2013/12/4 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
Looks fine for me!
2013/12/3 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
Hi
I have been thinking about how
Hi Thomas
What I can do is use an attribute to mark the view as poolable or not
poolable.
The annotation code must be done outside core.
regards,
Leonardo
2013/12/7 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
Leo, one question:
Is it possible to mark a view as poolable via code?
We
Looks fine for me!
2013/12/3 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
Hi
I have been thinking about how to define the configuration for the view
pool. The idea is add the following new web config parameters:
org.apache.myfaces.VIEW_POOL_ENABLED (enable / disable for all pages in
the app, by
Hi
I have been thinking about how to define the configuration for the view
pool. The idea is add the following new web config parameters:
org.apache.myfaces.VIEW_POOL_ENABLED (enable / disable for all pages in the
app, by default false)
org.apache.myfaces.VIEW_POOL_MAX_POOL_SIZE (the number of
Hi,
+1 for this feature in core 2.2.
Regards,
Kocicak
2013/11/24 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
Perfect. Thanks for Info.
So +1 from my side.
2013/11/24 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
Hi
2013/11/24 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
Hi Leo,
By
Hi Thomas
2013/11/23 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
Hi Leo,
all advantages and disadvantages are 100% fine for me but i don't like
this one:
- Third party libraries needs to be compatible with the technique.
What changes are required for third party components?
It is
Hi Leo,
By default all the code in UIComponentBase is already in place, so if all
components extend from UIComponentBase everything will work just fine
cool, perfect!
What about Behaviors or ActionListeners like:
Hi
2013/11/24 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
Hi Leo,
By default all the code in UIComponentBase is already in place, so if all
components extend from UIComponentBase everything will work just fine
cool, perfect!
What about Behaviors or ActionListeners like:
Perfect. Thanks for Info.
So +1 from my side.
2013/11/24 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
Hi
2013/11/24 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
Hi Leo,
By default all the code in UIComponentBase is already in place, so if
all components extend from UIComponentBase everything will
Hi
Some time ago it was discussed under these topics:
[core][proposal] JSF View Pooling (going beyond JSF Stateless Mode)
http://markmail.org/message/54rb3aphc6txwzbr
[core][discuss] Is it worth to include Stateless JSF / View Pooling
concept into MyFaces?
Hi Leo,
all advantages and disadvantages are 100% fine for me but i don't like this
one:
- Third party libraries needs to be compatible with the technique.
What changes are required for third party components?
Would it be possible that components are still 100% compatible with mojarra
without
23 matches
Mail list logo
