: default AutoScroll setting depends on Tomahawk
Sorry for being ignorant, but whats the value for the user to have the
focus reset on the last action component?
Let's say you are tabbing through the controls on a shopping cart page (in a
mouse-less world). After changing the number of items
Hi Lyon!
You never got back to me on this.
Yes, sorry!
What do you think? I am willing to help
add this functionality to the sandbox focus component if that is where you
think it should go but I think it should go with the auto-scrolling stuff
for accessibility reasons (i.e. no mouse).
I
On 4/13/06, Lyon, Chad S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am willing to help
add this functionality to the sandbox focus component if that is where you
think it should go but I think it should go with the auto-scrolling stuff
for accessibility reasons (i.e. no mouse).
I think it's fine for it to
Hi Sean!
No - its in shared.
And no - I cant add it to the branch as there are already additions for
tomahawk in the same class.
Are we talking about r393309? If so this looks pretty
self-contained. Its not immediately obvious to me why this revision
can't be added to the branch
Software Developer
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mario Ivankovits
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 5:03 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: default AutoScroll setting depends on Tomahawk
Hi
You seem like the person to approve the patch I wrote for auto-focus.
Sorry for being ignorant, but whats the value for the user to have the
focus reset on the last action component?
Could you please explain this a little bit for me.
If, I would like to have the focus set on the first
International Corporation (SAIC)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mario Ivankovits
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 9:59 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: default AutoScroll setting depends on Tomahawk
Hi
You seem like the person
On 4/11/06, Mario Ivankovits (JIRA) dev@myfaces.apache.org wrote:
We need to update the documentation.
I dont know when this changed and who it was, but the ExtensionsFilter is
required to add the javascript required by myfaces e.g. to handle the
scrolling stuff.
Mario.
The problem isn't
Mike Kienenberger schrieb:
On 4/11/06, Mario Ivankovits (JIRA) dev@myfaces.apache.org wrote:
We need to update the documentation.
I dont know when this changed and who it was, but the ExtensionsFilter is
required to add the javascript required by myfaces e.g. to handle the
scrolling
On 4/11/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so I'll check if the ExtensionsFilter is available (its part of
tomahawk) - and if not, this feature is disabled (and a warning logged).
If this is sufficient, I'll give that a try.
If we're planning on keeping autoscrolling in tomhawk
Hi!
On 4/11/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so I'll check if the ExtensionsFilter is available (its part of
tomahawk) - and if not, this feature is disabled (and a warning logged).
If this is sufficient, I'll give that a try.
If we're planning on keeping
On 4/11/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like this solution works with myfaces head, have to take a look
how to get it into the branch too.
I think Sean is going to make a new branch tonight so you won't have
to worry about it if you get it in before then.
Hi!
It looks like this solution works with myfaces head, have to take a look
how to get it into the branch too.
I think Sean is going to make a new branch tonight so you won't have
to worry about it if you get it in before then.
Ok, so its committed now. I hope I havent overlooked
I think Sean is going to make a new branch tonight so you won't have
to worry about it if you get it in before then.
Is this a core change? If so it should go on the *existing* branch
(and not the trunk.) If its on the trunk please back it out so I can
merge down from the branch when the TCK
Hi Sean!
I think Sean is going to make a new branch tonight so you won't have
to worry about it if you get it in before then.
Is this a core change? If so it should go on the *existing* branch
(and not the trunk.) If its on the trunk please back it out so I can
merge down from the
No - its in shared.
And no - I cant add it to the branch as there are already additions for
tomahawk in the same class.
Are we talking about r393309? If so this looks pretty
self-contained. Its not immediately obvious to me why this revision
can't be added to the branch and then merged
16 matches
Mail list logo
