Done! Thanks! I have put your class in the sources.
If you, or anyone else for that matters, want to fix /add more
handlers to the projects feel free to tell me and I can add you as
members right away!
Thanks,
Bruno
On 23/10/2007, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Please consider
Hi Bruno
I have put your class in the sources.
Thanks!
Unfortunately I don't know what I've done yesterday to not see a bug
with my TagHandler.
Please add this line this.nextHandler.apply(ctx, aliasBean); at the
end of the apply method, so it should look like the following then:
{
Hi!
If you, or anyone else for that matters, want to fix /add more
handlers to the projects feel free to tell me and I can add you as
members right away!
What about a MyFaces Facelets (MyFaces MyFacelets ;-) ) project at all,
not only for the taglibs we might host there then (as long as the
Once I get back to JSF work, I'd happily contribute to a MyFaces
Facelets project. As I've said in years past, I don't know how to
set up a maven project, but once someone set up the infrastructure for
such a project, I'd be able to help with the rest.
The same goes for the MyFaces commons
Done! Thanks Mario :)
Bruno
On 24/10/2007, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bruno
I have put your class in the sources.
Thanks!
Unfortunately I don't know what I've done yesterday to not see a bug
with my TagHandler.
Please add this line this.nextHandler.apply(ctx,
I would be a proponent for a new tomahawk-like project to house
facelets-only projects (tag handlers and components). I could even
move my annotation deployment code from jsf-comp over to myfaces for
such a project.
I'd be willing to help setup the projects to use the trinidad maven
plugin for
I did start with the implementation of tomahawk using the faces plugin
(not the old generator that Mario may be refering). The efforts are
done in a tomahawk branch, but due to lack of time I haven't got the
time to continue (I hope to do so :)). Configuring the
maven-faces-plugin to do something,
On 22/10/2007, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are already tomahawk-facelets.jar files out there if you want
to use something with drop-in support. See the wiki page for a link
to Bruno's http://code.google.com/p/tomahawk-facelets project.
Yes, I decided to make available
Hi,
a year ago i was playing with OLD generator to make it work again for
Tomahawk's core components - see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-819
- attachment tomahawk(no roleSelectionMode).patch
I withdrove the issue mainly because it become invalid in a matter of
weeks AND in
Hi!
Please consider adding the following handler for the AliasBean to your
project:
(This is my first Tag-Handler, so I am not sure if there is a more
elegant way - at least the AliasBean works here now)
import com.sun.facelets.FaceletContext;
import com.sun.facelets.FaceletException;
import
Hey Mario,
The reason that there is no alias bean handler is because it's not
needed with facelets.
Instead you'd use a Facelets composition and ui:include statement.
On 10/23/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Please consider adding the following handler for the AliasBean to
Hi!
The reason that there is no alias bean handler is because it's not
needed with facelets.
Still, the tag is not working as it should, so providing a tag handler
will fix this.
Instead you'd use a Facelets composition and ui:include statement.
That is not true for my use-case. As you
Wow. No, I somehow missed the relevence of aliasBean on the facelets
mailing list.
For what it's worth, you're the first person in the history of
facelets to need it, at least as far as I've read on mailing lists.
Would it maybe be better to create a rendertime-compatible version of
ui:include
Hi!
For what it's worth, you're the first person in the history of
facelets to need it, at least as far as I've read on mailing lists.
Yep, sometimes I have some strange ideas :-)
Would it maybe be better to create a rendertime-compatible version of
ui:include tag?
That is what I have
Hey Mario,
Thanks for keeping me honest :-)
You've been correcting a number of my misconceptions recently :-)
I went back and reread your facelets thread, and it does appear to be
a good dynamic ui:include. Why not use ui:param instead of f:param?
ui:param is already defined for facelets.
On
Hi!
I went back and reread your facelets thread, and it does appear to be
a good dynamic ui:include. Why not use ui:param instead of f:param?
ui:param is already defined for facelets.
Thanks for the tip. I am not that familiar with facelets yet, at all
just 3 days :-(, I'll look into this
There are already tomahawk-facelets.jar files out there if you want
to use something with drop-in support. See the wiki page for a link
to Bruno's http://code.google.com/p/tomahawk-facelets project.
I'm still -1 on any hand-maintained facelets taglib.xml being put
directly into the Tomahawk jar
Hi!
There are already tomahawk-facelets.jar files out there if you want
to use something with drop-in support. See the wiki page for a link
to Bruno's http://code.google.com/p/tomahawk-facelets project.
Thanks for the link!
If three years of maintaining the file on the wiki hasn't been
On 10/22/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it takes years of getting tomahawk running again with the generator,
why do you think it will happen someone soon ;-) - sorry ;-)
Touche! :-)
That's a fair response, but since someone (Andrew?) has gotten it
working with MyFaces Core
19 matches
Mail list logo
