[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-743?page=comments#action_12356758
]
Luciano Medina commented on MYFACES-743:
Also, and this might be related to the problem, I just noticed that the
generated HTML body tag is malformed:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-736?page=comments#action_12356770
]
Keijo Nurmes commented on MYFACES-736:
--
Anyone care to comment?
Is it possible to revert the ValueBindingImpl.setValue patch. (2.10.2005)
(I have been running reverted
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-623?page=comments#action_12356772
]
Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-623:
---
MYFACES 736 shows a problem if coercion is not done -
Oliver, care to comment there?
regards,
Martin
setValue()
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-623?page=comments#action_12356773
]
Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-623:
---
MYFACES-736
setValue() method of ValueBindingImpl does not behave properly
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-736?page=comments#action_12356774
]
Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-736:
---
Obviously this is linked to MYFACES-623 - and removing the coercion there was
not the right solution.
regards,
Hello MyFaces developers and users,
Wide distribution intended.
I'm sure all of us working on JSF technologies are
aware of the growing
popularity of Ruby on Rails. One manifestation of
this popularity is
the vitality of the community around the technology,
and one
manifestation of that
Although we have spoken already in the ##jsf irc channel on
irc.freenode.net I answer here again so other developers know the
answer and that this has been solved:
To just build one of the subprojects of myfaces, use 'ant dist' and
not just 'ant' by default,
Regards,
Bruno
2005/11/4, Ed Burns
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-781?page=comments#action_12356794
]
Mike Kienenberger commented on MYFACES-781:
---
Oops! I made the last comment right before going to sleep, and I didn't notice
I was looking at the javadocs for
t:tree2: javascript error in some version of IE
---
Key: MYFACES-783
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-783
Project: MyFaces
Type: Bug
Components: Tomahawk
Versions: 1.1.1, Nightly
Environment:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-783?page=all ]
Konstantin Shaposhnikov updated MYFACES-783:
Attachment: undefined_fix.patch
t:tree2: javascript error in some version of IE
---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-781?page=all ]
Martin Marinschek closed MYFACES-781:
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
UIData accesses its grandchild components directly
--
Key:
I'd like to see it too
-bd-
On Nov 4, 2005, at 12:36 AM, Colin Chalmers wrote:
Hi all,
No I hadn't forgotten this, just that I was trying to get some
functionality working and posting questions on the maven site. I
still didn't get that to work but thought I could at least share
what I
This is certainly a large issue. Some products still have to support Java 1.3. At ILOG I had major issues when trying to move from RI to MyFaces as it involved a move to 1.4. Thankfully after almost six months I got approval but it was a pain. There are no moves being made because, just a Heinz
There's no choice in regards to JSF 1.2. JSF 1.2 already requires Java 1.5.
However, I'm definitely against JSF 1.1 requiring Java 1.5.
On 11/4/05, Keith Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is certainly a large issue. Some products still have to support Java
1.3.
At ILOG I had major issues
JSF 1.2 spec requires JDK 5.
From: Keith Lynch
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005
9:29 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: JDK 1.5, JSP 2.0 XML
This is certainly a large
issue. Some products still have to support Java 1.3.
At ILOG I had major
agreed, we can't require java 5 with 1.1 (the spec says 1.4).
TTFN,
-bd-
On Nov 4, 2005, at 10:33 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
There's no choice in regards to JSF 1.2. JSF 1.2 already requires
Java 1.5.
However, I'm definitely against JSF 1.1 requiring Java 1.5.
On 11/4/05, Keith Lynch
Popup component renders an empty box at the 0px origin in addition to the
offset popup window IF margin-top:-0px or margin-left:0px; are set to a value
other than 0px (200px for example)
I am just using the Extensions Filter and an AuthFilter (that does not catch any exceptions).Here's an example of one what happens, this is what I get in my log:Nov 4, 2005 1:09:27 PM
org.apache.myfaces.context.servlet.ServletExternalContextImpl lookupCharacterEncodingFINE: Incoming request has
Here's another example on a property value that has a
NullPointerException and the only reason I know this is because I had
to put a try/catch in the getter.
HTTP Status 500 -
type Exception report
message
description The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from
Quite frankly I don't see why JSF 1.2 spec requires it. I know they
had their reasons but I am doing just fine with JDK 1.4. I like
upgrading just as much as the next guy but 1.4 seems sufficient IMO.
sean
On 11/4/05, Bill Dudney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
agreed, we can't require java 5 with
I was interested in getting feedback from current communities of Roomity.com and let you know the recent improvements we are working on for better interface.Roomity.com v 1.5 is a web 2.01/RiA poster child community webapp. This new version adds broadcast video, social networking such as favorite
I personally would give a f...airly low amount of interest what JSF
1.2 requires.
My revenue is generated from existing customers and not the ones from
2007 or later.
And as I said, they are mostly WebSphere-based where not even a
roadmap for the use of Java 5 exists. In another case the customer
Docs refer to non-existant spec. section
Key: MYFACES-785
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-785
Project: MyFaces
Type: Bug
Versions: 1.1.0
Environment: n/a
Reporter: Dennis Byrne
Priority:
23 matches
Mail list logo
