Re: [core] Introducing implee6 - MYFACES-2579

Hi Bernd, For some users it may be so ;) :D Look Bernd, it's not that big thing. It's just a class and a text file. So it is by no means a problem to ship this with MyFaces Core 2. Also Mojarra does something similar too! To your question: Nope! I just add the FacesServlet and the standard

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-2559) Google App Engine Support for Myfaces 2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842385#action_12842385 ] Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2559: I think the problem is because of

[jira] Resolved: (MYFACES-2589) Partial response writer, delete resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Werner Punz resolved MYFACES-2589. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Ok no bug, the worklfow is clear, if we start an operatio within

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (MYFACES-2589) Partial response writer, delete resolution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842392#action_12842392 ] Werner Punz edited comment on MYFACES-2589 at 3/7/10 10:21 AM:

Re: [core] Introducing implee6 - MYFACES-2579

In other words: Convention over configuration ;-) I just think it's important to pick sensible defaults and to be able to turn it off, for example using a context-param. For example, I think the mapping *.xhtml should also be default, but a developer must be able to turn *.xhtml off, since it's

Re: [core] Introducing implee6 - MYFACES-2579

Yep! We can discuss this stuff when the submodule is in place. Such things are very easy to change/configure in the StartupListener. However, I think we should come up with a very standard default configuration. If the user wants something different, he will have to configure the mapping himself

Re: [core] Introducing implee6 - MYFACES-2579

Agreed, I was only thinking of one parameter: A parameter to turn the entire StartupListener off. I look at it as a binary thing. Either the developer chooses to go with the flow with no custimization, OR he chooses to customize everything. I.e.

Re: [core] Introducing implee6 - MYFACES-2579

I think we don't even need such a parameter, because the idea is that the listener just does nothing if there are already entries for the FacesServlet in web.xml! Regards, Jakob 2010/3/7 Jan-Kees van Andel jankeesvanan...@gmail.com Agreed, I was only thinking of one parameter: A parameter to

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-2529) use of view-param in faces-config causes a NoSuchMethodExcepion for addViewParam

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842434#action_12842434 ] Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2529: This was solved by MYFACES-2508,

[jira] Resolved: (MYFACES-2529) use of view-param in faces-config causes a NoSuchMethodExcepion for addViewParam

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakob Korherr resolved MYFACES-2529. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-beta-3 use of view-param in faces-config

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-2585) ajax doesn't work if target contains script with CDATA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842439#action_12842439 ] Werner Punz commented on MYFACES-2585: -- It is complicated, basically you have to

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-2585) ajax doesn't work if target contains script with CDATA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842440#action_12842440 ] Jan-Kees van Andel commented on MYFACES-2585: - I'm just looking at it from

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-2585) ajax doesn't work if target contains script with CDATA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842476#action_12842476 ] Werner Punz commented on MYFACES-2585: -- Ok sounds like I was a little bit too much

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (MYFACES-2585) ajax doesn't work if target contains script with CDATA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842476#action_12842476 ] Werner Punz edited comment on MYFACES-2585 at 3/7/10 8:09 PM:

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (MYFACES-2585) ajax doesn't work if target contains script with CDATA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842476#action_12842476 ] Werner Punz edited comment on MYFACES-2585 at 3/7/10 8:09 PM:

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (MYFACES-2585) ajax doesn't work if target contains script with CDATA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842476#action_12842476 ] Werner Punz edited comment on MYFACES-2585 at 3/7/10 8:38 PM:

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-2555) org.apache.myfaces.config.annotation.LifecycleProvider context parameter is ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842488#action_12842488 ] Ali Ok commented on MYFACES-2555: - Ok, cool :)

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-2585) ajax doesn't work if target contains script with CDATA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842563#action_12842563 ] Ganesh Jung commented on MYFACES-2585: -- This discussion confuses me. Werner, could

Re: [core] Introducing implee6 - MYFACES-2579

+1 for that idea, the less configuration the better. Werner Am 07.03.10 15:44, schrieb Jakob Korherr: I think we don't even need such a parameter, because the idea is that the listener just does nothing if there are already entries for the FacesServlet in web.xml! Regards, Jakob 2010/3/7