How exactly is having the Double.MIN/MAX available on the client going
to help us? Isn't the result of an overflow a valid Double?
-- Blake Sullivan
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
ok,
we can use undefined instead of null.
So we can use the undefined to indicate that Number.MAX / -Number.MAX
the latter)
Do surrogates count as a character?
-- Blake Sullivan
- If min and max are the same, we don't have a custom message,
so you'd get something like Enter a value between 5 and 5
characters. Looks silly. So, in addition to
LengthValidator.NOT_IN_RANGE, I'll add LengthValidator.EXACT
Adam Winer wrote:
On 5/22/07, Blake Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Winer wrote:
The Trinidad subclass of LengthValidator needs some work.
Changes I plan to make - feedback appreciated:
- The messages are copied from the LongRangeValidator, so
we say Enter a value greater than
/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-18
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Skinning
Affects Versions: 1.0.1-core, 2.0.0-core
Environment: Windows XP
Reporter: Blake Sullivan
Assignee: Jeanne Waldman
Fix For: 1.0.1-core
I
How does this compare to JSUnit?
-- Blake
Adam Winer wrote:
This'd be SWEET!
-- Adam
On 7/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
perhaps we should add some Unit tests (via [1]) to Trinidad,
to test stuff like our converters:
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import
Considering that I reviewed them, it isn't surprising that I like all of
these changes.
-- Blake Sullivan
Jeanne Waldman wrote:
Hi there,
I have some new Skin API proposals I would like to run by everyone.
This involves public API changes and some private IMPL changes, and
comes up while I
.
Is this map of id-FacesMessage[] or id -ListFacesMessage?
-- Blake Sullivan
-- Adam
* Fix the order of output messages. Currently messages output by
the
above
methods appear in the order of required errors, convertor errors,
validator
errors. Rather than the order in which
one
another.--their keys are supposed to be disjoint. Therefore, I would go
for Collection.
-- Blake Sullivan
Regards,
~ Simon
On 7/24/07, *Jeanne Waldman* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks everyone. I'm almost done with the implementation.
What should
Adam Winer wrote:
On 8/22/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/22/07, Danny Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
Now we're into 1.0.3, I'd like to enable the inline validation for
'onchange' of an input component. I'd like to start some discussion on how
we'd
are either
dangerous for compatibility and/or cases where HotSpot can determine
that the optimization is possible based on the classes actually loaded
in your application, which optimizes all of the non-final cases as well.
-- Blake Sullivan
AFAIK, there is zero benefit to performance from
of trunk?
+1
Adding features in too early is a good way to make problems for
ourselves later. Once we are certain that we understand the problem
space, if these components are the best solution, it will be easy to
move them to trunk.
-- Blake Sullivan
-- Adam
resource-bundle with a var name within the faces-config.xml.
This would also be useful, but isn't mutually exclusive with the above.
-- Blake Sullivan
~ Simon
On 9/21/07, *Jeanne Waldman* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a new issue I need to resolve
Winer handled most of it.
-- Blake Sullivan
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On 10/24/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/24/07, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO, the 1.1 would still act as the main trunk for new features that
are not 1.2 specific. It would
, the need
for JSF 1.1 won't be that large as now.
Yep. I assume the JSF 1.1 - 1.2 change is more painful because of the
J2EE container requirement (which hopefully JSF 2.0 will take better
advantage of than 1.2 does).
-- Blake Sullivan
To me, this makes sense.
-M
-- Blake
like important
Matthias,
If the committers want to spend their time backporting fixes to 1.0.x,
that's their right.
-- Blake Sullivan
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
what do you think about doing a 1.0.4 release soon, and the afterwards
created 1.2.4-branch becomes trunk then.
The 1.0.x development goes
no regressions relative to 1.0.x. I
would have thought that waiting at least seventeen months to cur over to
1.2 would ahve been long enough.
-- Blake Sullivan
- anyone else want to chime in.
Danny
On 10/29/07, *Scott O'Bryan* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah
that the String that we pass
to the NumberFormatter has no spaces in it?
-- Blake
-Matthias
On Nov 30, 2007 7:25 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blake,
out of the blue, but perhaps that is a JDK bug?
I am on 1.5.0_11
On Nov 30, 2007 7:14 PM, Blake Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
-- Blake Sullivan
convenience functions, then it is confusing to have
both the class itself and a separate Utils class. Given that we have a
separate Utils class, these methods shouldn't be on the abstract class.
-- Blake Sullivan
-Andrew
useless.
In the future, I think we should make that method as well as
PropertyKey class generic aware.
I completely agree. I did this on a branch one night but never got
around to submitting the patch.
-- Blake Sullivan
Regards,
~ Simon
/**
* This method evaluates the property
I'm, of course, in favor.
-- Blake Sullivan
Gabrielle Crawford wrote:
Hi,
In case anyone filtered away the [jira] message.
I'd like to add the method described below to the requestContext.
Comments? Objections?
Thanks,
Gab
Original Message
add method to get
ConcurrentHashMap, which uses lock striping internally.
-- Blake Sullivan
If we are able to satisfy our requirements by going down this route, I
would prefer this over adding a somewhat-redundant API to Trinidad
(ie. would prefer fixing the underlying problems so that we can use
the Application map
Andy Schwartz wrote:
Hey Blake -
On Jan 30, 2008 11:52 AM, Blake Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is more of an issue, however the other problem is that the
ServletContext and Session still don't expose the atomic operations of
ConcurrentMap. Neither do they document what object
Andy Schwartz wrote:
Hey Blake -
On Jan 30, 2008 3:57 PM, Blake Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that we do want to do this, but we can hold off until we have
concrete needs unless the synchronization is actually killing our
performance on the Servlet Container implementations
Jeanne,
Can't we use the old code path in the case where the form component is
not a naming container and the scoped id contains less than 2 colons.
This is probably by far the most common case and I believe that the
result is the same across all three schemes.
-- Blake
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
against the
likelihood of regression? It seems that your disagreement is with the
relative weighting of the advantages and disadvantages in this case,
which is a fair complaint but isn't precedent setting.
-- Blake Sullivan
Scott
Max Starets wrote:
I'd say leave it in UIXComponentBase
be depending on this API. I don't by the let's break
it and see if anyone complains attitude, and that is the precedent I
was referring to.
I don't think anyone ever said that we shouldn't ask the list.
-- Blake Sullivan
This is why I mentioned that I'm willing to concede the point if
nobody
and then have to explain when you
should use one rather than the other.
-- Blake Sullivan
the whole issue is based on common requirements of real world projects.
i'm sure that there is a reason for the current approach. however,
there are also other opinions out there.
so it would be great
requirements.
support for:
- subforms
- different types of focus handling
What types?
- conventions
What conventions?
We are looking for actual use cases as opposed to support everything
that this piece of code supports.
-- Blake Sullivan
and of course:
the solutions shouldn't break backward
Gerhard,
What are the semantics of the groups and how do they compare to subforms?
-- Blake Sullivan
Gerhard Petracek (JIRA) said the following On 3/11/2008 1:46 AM PT:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment
Jeanne Waldman (JIRA) said the following On 3/18/2008 2:03 PM PT:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12580079#action_12580079 ]
Jeanne Waldman commented on TRINIDAD-1014:
these cases.
-- Blake Sullivan
Andy Schwartz said the following On 3/22/2008 5:15 AM PT:
Hey All -
The concern with exposing a public component-level tabIndex attribute
has always been that this opens up the potential for way more problems
than it solves. The problem with HTML tabIndex attribute
. a desire to be able to change the Renderer implementation without
breaking subclassers. I actually think that we went too far in
providing lots of subclasser knobs in Trinidad, but that's just my opinion.
-- Blake Sullivan
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/9/2008 5:23 PM PT:
Hi guys,
A lot
possible
subclasser might want.
If there really are huge chunks of interesting code that should be
shared in this case, they can be broken out into utilities and shared
that way.
-- Blake Sullivan
-Andrew
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Andy Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10
implementation.
-- Blake Sullivan
Python goes further, it has no final, everything is mutable. The idea
is to give ppl. the power they need and let them shoot themselves in
the foot if they want to.
This isn't just a matter of principle. I challenge you to author a
real world application
for the best on upgrades does not decrease their maintenance burden.
-- Blake Sullivan
I fully agree that #2 is the solution though and even that we need to
make some part of the trinidad rendering in the API, because I
strongly feel that only having components in the API is just
up a new version and knows that he might be hosed if the
superclass code changed (which he should recheck when he reapplies his
hack).
-- Blake Sullivan
The other solution is to open things up in response to need. Since
there is already a clear path for dealing with missing functionality
with an artificial reason
for why they can not do this.
This has definitely ceased being a productive discussion.
-- Blake Sullivan
the particular problems we were experiencing
at that point in time. Therefore, if you want to extend a Trinidad
Renderer class, even in an unsupported fashion, you need to accept that
you might need to hack.
-- Blake Sullivan
If you don't personally agree to go through each and every source file
(OK many times), I'll send a two page plan out
for review and you're only comments will be on these two minor points
that I got wrong.
To repeat, I'm sorry.
-- Blake Sullivan
Andrew Robinson said the following On 4/15/2008 9:01 AM PT:
I wish to withdraw and clarify the scope of my apology
the guaranteed lifetime for these
changes is.
-- Blake Sullivan
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Cristi Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
Dividing this thread is the best thing.
But I think we either reached a conclusion or we should start a vote about
final/private methods
We can change
-version 7.5 really means version 7.6)
-- Blake Sullivan
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/16/2008 3:24 PM PT:
Hi guys,
I finally added browser version support in skinning, but using a
different format than first suggested.
As we needed to support multiple browsers, each with multiple
don't know what it means, but I assume it's very browser dependent.
Determining a floating point browser version isn't a technical problem
and should be supported. The Gecko engine is an example of an engine
that adds CSS features in point releases 1.8 - 1.9 for example.
-- Blake Sullivan
But do
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/16/2008 11:32 PM PT:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Blake Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/16/2008 5:34 PM PT:
Hi Blake,
I wanted to be backwards compatible with what the XSS
) is potentially confusing due to inconsistency
3) might not be immediately obvious and could theoretically have
precision problems
4) is not immediately obvious either but incredibly flexible
I vote for 3) since it gets the job done and doesn't preclude doing more
later.
-- Blake Sullivan
== true
-- Blake Sullivan
If so, I like 3 as well.
-Andrew
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Blake Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we agree that we like the we like the media query syntax and that the
only issue is how to handle less than (as opposed the =) for the
max-version, then we
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/17/2008 2:00 PM PT:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Blake Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Robinson said the following On 4/17/2008 12:35 PM PT:
So do I read this correctly that for #3, 8 means 8.x so
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/17/2008 2:00 PM PT:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Blake Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Robinson said the following On 4/17/2008 12:35 PM PT:
So do I read this correctly that for #3, 8 means 8.x so
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/17/2008 2:25 PM PT:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Blake Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/17/2008 2:00 PM PT
Does anybody KNOW how the browsers express their version exactly
:1.9.2)
does not match because the browser version 1.9 expands to 1.9.0 and
1.9.2 is than 1.9.0
// actual browser version gecko 1.9
@agent gecko and (min-version:1.9.*)
matches because the browser version 1.9 expands to 1.9.0 and 1.9.* == 1.9.0
-- Blake Sullivan
Blake Sullivan said
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/18/2008 2:58 PM PT:
I like this too
does the list of space separated numbers comply to that CSS future
spec we were talking about?
I don't think it does.
-- Blake Sullivan
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL
:6), ie and (version:8)
-- Blake Sullivan
Or this doesn't make sense?
Glauco P. Gomes
Matt Cooper escreveu:
It does:
@agent ie and (min-version:5) and (max-version:7) {
/* styles for all 5.*, 6.*, and 7.* versions of the IE agent versions */
}
Regards,
Matt
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 5:02 PM
this Object to be
returned by the Agent.
-- Blake Sullivan
Blake Sullivan said the following On 4/18/2008 3:15 PM PT:
OK, how about
option 5) the version feature is a String that matches the native
major.minor.whatever format of the browser's engine. If the
browser's engine uses non
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/19/2008 3:51 AM PT:
or @agent ie and (version:6) and (version:8)
This rule would never be true because it is asserting that the agent
must match IE and the version must match both 6.* and 8.*
-- Blake Sullivan
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 1:31 AM, Blake
Cristi Toth said the following On 4/19/2008 10:58 AM PT:
:) yep, I forgot about the and
is or valid in those CSS rules?
No. That's what the comma is for.
-- Blake Sullivan
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Blake Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cristi Toth
and agent that we see (as opposed to one per major agent version
as we do now).
-- Blake Sullivan
Blake said there is something like this in Rich Client already and
that you could donate the regex used for that.
But since then he didn't give any sign of the code and I had no time
to bug him
architectural changes at all.
-- Adam
Solve
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-697
at the framework level?
-- Blake Sullivan
Andrew Robinson said the following On 5/15/2008 11:03 AM PT:
He mentioned ways to do it using backing beans and non-declarative
ways. He also didn't like my
author.
-- Blake Sullivan
Adding a new components gives users the flexibility to choose the way
they want to implement it and be able to work with non-Trinidad
libraries. IMO this is a much better solution than a small enhancement
for Trinidad messaging and JavaScript.
-Andrew
On Thu, May 15
of these we prefer, if
we want to go here at all right now, also depends on how often we think
page authors would use this feature.
-- Blake Sullivan
Andrew Robinson said the following On 5/15/2008 2:02 PM PT:
I would like to get back on track to the original subject and not let
the messaging
The tricky issue with remembering this state in the server is cleaning
up if the redirect request never comes back. If you are content to wait
until the session times-out, or there is another dialog request, then it
isn't a problem.
-- Blake Sullivan
Scott O'Bryan (JIRA) said the following
triggers exist?
-- Blake Sullivan
Andrew Robinson (JIRA) said the following On 9/24/2008 7:55 PM PT:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson resolved TRINIDAD-663
work well with partialTriggers or partialTargets,
but a Renderer can override this to always render the id if any partial
triggers are set (and in fact, the rich client does). However, the
Renderer knows nothing about other partial targets.
-- Blake Sullivan
-Andrew
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Archetype
Affects Versions: 1.2.9-core
Environment: All
Reporter: Blake Sullivan
Assignee: Matthias Weßendorf
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.2.10-core
: Improvement
Affects Versions: 1.2.9-core, 1.2.10-core
Environment: All
Reporter: Blake Sullivan
Assignee: Matthias Weßendorf
Fix For: 1.2.10-core
Attachments: JIRA_1260_1291.patch
Original Estimate: 2h
Remaining Estimate: 2h
it is more important to find these problems during
development.
-- Blake Sullivan
Simon Lessard said the following On 10/16/2008 12:50 PM PT:
Hi all,
I'm working on an ADF Faces Rich Client atm and as some may know, that
library is based on Trinidad. Anyway, while debugging for a completely
This is because the current ChangeManager implementation doesn't
collapse AttributeComponentChanges for a change to the same attribute
on the same component.
-- Blake Sullivan
Azhaguramanhjam, Ramkumar said the following On 2/4/2009 7:39 AM PT:
Hi
This is
regarding
to the handling of ValidatorExceptions earlier in the lifecycle?
-- Blake Sullivan
Min Lu said the following On 2/16/2009 10:33 AM PT:
The patch below is for message reformat. We need a solution to skip reporting
message.
Since other than ValiatorException, the end users cannot fix other types of exception
that we should move the check up so that we send fewer spurious
warnings.
-- Blake Sullivan
the component hierarchy
-- Blake Sullivan
the
// child renderer in case anyone wants to use renderer
decoration.
I'm not sure what issue Adam is referring to here, since I would have
thought that anyone doing Renderer decoration would have done so by
decorating the RenderKitFactory.
-- Blake Sullivan
Simon Lessard said
the
// child renderer in case anyone wants to use renderer
decoration.
I'm not sure what issue Adam is referring to here, since I would have
thought that anyone doing Renderer decoration would have done so by
decorating the RenderKitFactory.
-- Blake Sullivan
Simon Lessard said
Does any of the impl code cast the RequestContext to the
RequestContextImpl? If it does, that would be the reason.
-- Blake
Matthias Wessendorf said the following On 5/1/2009 4:06 AM PT:
not sure why it was done. The code was never really touched within the
last two years..
Perhaps Blake or
Matthias,
Would things be improved if we moved the configuration to
trinidad-config.xml and allowed the configuration to be retrieved on a
per-request basis?
-- Blake Sullivan
Matthias Weßendorf (JIRA) said the following On 5/1/2009 4:25 AM PT:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
attribute. Since we reread the EL-bound attributes on each request, the
application is free to use any scheme it wants to determine the maximum
size, including doing so on a per-user or per-user-per-request basis.
-- Blake Sullivan
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Blake Sullivan
blake.sulli
(ExternalContext extContext,
WindowLifecycleEvent event);
}
Blake Sullivan (JIRA) said the following On 5/15/2009 11:41 AM PT:
Add Window abstraction to Trinidad
--
Key: TRINIDAD-1474
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD
? Are you talking about the ExternalContext?
Thanks for the helpful feedback.
--Blake Sullivan
Regards,
~ Simon
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Blake Sullivan
blake.sulli...@oracle.com mailto:blake.sulli...@oracle.com wrote:
Here is the proposed api:
package
()
rename addWindowListener to addWindowLifecycleListener
rename removeWindowListener to removeWindowLifecycleListener
Window:
add isNew()
-- Blake Sullivan
Blake Sullivan said the following On 5/15/2009 10:18 PM PT:
Simon Lessard said the following On 5/15/2009 12:35 PM PT:
Hi Blake,
I'm + 1
the application ignore events on any windows it doesn't
care about.
-- Blake Sullivan
~ Simon
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Blake Sullivan
blake.sulli...@oracle.com mailto:blake.sulli...@oracle.com wrote:
Simon Lessard said the following On 5/15/2009 12:35 PM PT:
Hi Blake,
I'm
Looks good.
-- Blake
Max Starets (JIRA) said the following On 5/21/2009 8:46 AM PT:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12711659#action_12711659 ]
Max Starets commented on
for the purpose of
encoding, it can check
ComponentProcessingContext.getHints().contains(ProcessingHint.PROCESS_FOR_ENCODING)
-- Blake Sullivan
The direct replacement for the void operator is undefined. Does he
really want undefined or does he want null.
-- Blake
Matthias Weßendorf (JIRA) said the following On 7/9/2009 5:59 AM PT:
[
Matthias,
This is slightly wrong for a couple of reasons:
1) We need to gather up all of the required whitespace, which can be
more than one character and could be characters other than space
2) We need to ensure that the required whitespace was present before we
called trim
-- Blake
You should have talked to me, since i was working on the same thing.
-- Blake Sullivan
On Jul 27, 2009, at 9:13 PM, Andrew Robinson (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson
to hold a reference to the unserializable structure and then lazily
rebuild the structure if necessary.
-- Blake Sullivan
I don't believe that SessionSerializationChecker should have a
getWrapped method yet. This class follows the pattern of the
Collections decorators which don't have getWrapped().
-- Blake Sullivan
Martin Kočí said the following On 10/8/2009 3:55 AM PT:
Hi,
I'm using trinidad with mojarra
We want our projects for debugging to have assertions on. Since
assertions are controlled at runtime and are off by default, this has
no effect on the performance of our customers' applications.
- Blake Sullivan
On Oct 11, 2009, at 10:05 PM, Maria Kaval wrote:
[Gary K] Default is -ea
, just on trunk (Trinidad 1.2.x)
Thx,
Matthias
Matthias,
A bunch of the constants appear to be implementation-dependent. Rather
than making the entire class public, I think you should come up with a
proposal for which constants you want to move to a public class.
-- Blake Sullivan
+1
-- Blake Sullivan
Matthias Wessendorf said the following On 10/16/2009 11:12 AM PT:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Blake Sullivan
blake.sulli...@oracle.com wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf said the following On 10/15/2009 5:48 PM PT:
Hi,
I'd like to move the XhtmlConstants class
invokeOnComponent or tree visiting).
-- Blake Sullivan
On Oct 27, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I read up on the UIComponent.visitTree and it says its implementation
has to call pushComponentToEL()/popComponentFromEL()
before/after the processing. Somehow I feel that we may should do
by
checking if the Listener is already registered is likely faster and smaller.
-- Blake Sullivan
jing wu said the following On 10/28/2009 10:14 AM PT:
RowKey is used in collection model to identify a row, it is safer to
use than row indicies because RowKeys are unaffected by mutations
to ensure that the interface is complete from
the beginning because we can't add more methods later without breaking
backwards compatibility.
-- Blake Sullivan
Kamran Kashanian (JIRA) said the following On 11/4/2009 8:31 AM PT:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1620?page
.
-- Blake Sullivan
Andrew Robinson said the following On 12/10/2009 11:56 AM PT:
While implementing the client behaviors on the Trinidad 2 branch I
noticed something that does not sit right with me. I noticed that the
on* attributes (onclick, onmouseover, etc.) are rendered by the
renderEventHandlers
?
Thanks,
Matthias
[1] org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.ENABLE_PPR_OPTIMIZATION
It is temporary because application developers shouldn't have to set it,
it should just work.
-- Blake Sullivan
our class instance is shared across applications.
-- Blake Sullivan
Matthias Wessendorf said the following On 12/17/2009 7:41 AM PT:
The CHECK_STATE_SERIALIZATION parameter is evaluated (via System
Property) in the static constructor of the StateUtils class;
Not sure if we really should move
and you don't want to recreate it each time.
-- Blake Sullivan
On Dec 18, 2009, at 2:25 AM, Majid Hussain wrote:
Hi,
My project is build in JSF, Hibernate and Faclets. i m using
trinidad treetable tag to build a tree with multiselection nodes.
Now i m facing a problem to initially selection
critical problem.
In addition, my understanding is that this api was only added to the
RequestContextImpl, rather than the RequestContext itself and so is
only accidentally available to page authors through EL.
-- Blake Sullivan
On Dec 22, 2009, at 11:07 AM, Mamallan Uthaman wrote:
Hi Andrew
basis, we can remove this API. Please share your
thoughts?
Thanks
Mamallan
Blake Sullivan wrote:
Mamallan,
Related to what Andrew is saying, I think that the real issue is
that this is the wrong api. Agents don't have skins--skins are
specialized for agents. It seems that there were two
You're missing the and. The skinning.xml documentation is wrong. I'm
fixing it right now at part of JIRA-1547
@agent ie *and *(version: 6)
-- Blake Sullivan
Mamallan Uthaman said the following On 12/28/2009 4:16 PM PT:
I just checked the skinning based on an agent name and its version
OK, the HTML to plaint text converter added the asterixes. This should be:
@agent ie and (version:6)
-- Blake
Blake Sullivan said the following On 12/28/2009 4:23 PM PT:
You're missing the and. The skinning.xml documentation is wrong.
I'm fixing it right now at part of JIRA-1547
@agent
UIComponent.getId() is by far the most requested component attribute.
There are a number of reasons for this:
1) The JSF RI has an issue in the JSP-JSF integration which causes
getId() to be called n^2 times where n is the number of children a
component has
2) getClientId() calls getId()
3)
1 - 100 of 388 matches
Mail list logo
