Re: Lose Weight Program for OFBiz

On Mar 19, 2012, at 12:26 AM, Anne wrote: Basic ideas all look very good to me. IMO anything that is incomplete or not maintained should be moved to Attic or Extras, unless there is a very good reason for keeping it. The reason for moving it should be well documented. That way it is obvious

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-4732) Not able to add Order Item Type for PO while adding item to existing PO.

Not able to add Order Item Type for PO while adding item to existing PO. Key: OFBIZ-4732 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4732 Project: OFBiz Issue

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-4732) Not able to add Order Item Type for PO while adding item to existing PO.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Deepak Dixit updated OFBIZ-4732: Attachment: OFBIZ-4732-Trunk.patch OFBIZ-4732-11.04.patch

Re: bin folder for executable files/scripts

Hi Jacopo, tools/bin sounds good to me Jacques From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com Thanks everyone for the valuable comments! I am trying to finalize this thread: there seems to be consensus to move all the executable scripts into a folder to keep things organized.

[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-4732) Not able to add Order Item Type for PO while adding item to existing PO.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Vijaywargiya reassigned OFBIZ-4732: -- Assignee: Ashish Vijaywargiya Not able to add Order Item Type for PO

Re: Lose Weight Program for OFBiz

Hi Jacopo, Thank you for the effort you spend with OFBiz the last few months. I generally agree that sure we have to cut the dead wood in the system. Components and functions which are not used or only halfway implemented sure, sounds like a good idea to move them out. However the reasons

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-4733) Xml Deserializer does not support BigDecimal

Xml Deserializer does not support BigDecimal Key: OFBIZ-4733 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4733 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: framework Affects

[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-4733) Xml Deserializer does not support BigDecimal

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-4733: -- Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Xml Deserializer does not support BigDecimal

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-4730) make property-to-field/ in widget firstly lookup up the SystemProperty entity and then the properties file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hans Bakker closed OFBIZ-4730. -- Resolution: Fixed New Revision: 1302320, thank you Leon for the contribution. make

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-4733) Xml Deserializer does not support BigDecimal

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4733. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: SVN trunk Thanks Alexander, As it was a tiny one, I

Re: Lose Weight Program for OFBiz

Hi Hans, please see inline: On Mar 19, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: Hi Jacopo, Thank you for the effort you spend with OFBiz the last few months. I generally agree that sure we have to cut the dead wood in the system. Components and functions which are not used or only halfway

Re: Lose Weight Program for OFBiz

Hi Hans, I don't want to argue the merits of removing specific portions of code/features/components but I think it's worth mentioning some of the benefits of moving features to Extras: - Greater access to contributors, if someone is making regular quality contributions to a specific Extra then

Re: bin folder for executable files/scripts

bin is good enough. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote: Hi Jacopo, tools/bin  sounds good to me Jacques From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com Thanks everyone for the valuable comments! I am trying to finalize this

goodbye

unsubscribe dev@ofbiz.apache.org

Re: Lose Weight Program for OFBiz

A point I'd like to emphasize: before moving things out we should check all related pending Jiras Jacques

Re: goodbye

This is not the way, you should use https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Mailing+Lists Jacques From: Francisca Hernández fhernan...@iguanait.com unsubscribe dev@ofbiz.apache.org

Re: Lose Weight Program for OFBiz

Scott, I appreciate your reply , but this apache extra's stuff is not working.: the Apache extra's is now over one year old, in that time there are 125 extra's for 84 projects. I even counted all the test and apple dirs.most projects are empty and do not have any extra's sorry i

Re: Lose Weight Program for OFBiz

Jacopo, I appreciate you reply and effort, can however not agree with you. Perhaps for you good reasoning, not for me. Regards, Hans On 03/19/2012 05:08 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Hi Hans, please see inline: On Mar 19, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: Hi Jacopo, Thank you for

OFBiz integration in Apache sonar instance

Hi all, last year I started the OFBiz integration in the Apache sonar instance. But I've been stopped by a request from infra, as I need to give the ports dynamically. And don't know how to make it happen... https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3590 If anyone has a pointer, this would

Re: Lose Weight Program for OFBiz

Thank you Scott. I will wait a bit more before summarizing some of the concepts/opinion expressed so far and then I will initiate, as you suggested, separate threads. Jacopo On Mar 18, 2012, at 9:15 PM, Scott Gray wrote: I agree with the concept completely. I wonder though if each of the

Re: Lose Weight Program for OFBiz

I want also to emphasize that having many possible syntaxes in use-when, set, etc. is not a plus for me. We could make it possible but have a single way in OFBiz OOTB. I guess there are no needs to argue about... Jacques From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com A point I'd like to

loop code simplification

Hi, I'm trying to remove a lot of iterators, and use the for-each syntax, which exists since java 1.5. During my journey, I found a lot of double tests for a while like this one: while (typePurposes != null typePurposes.hasNext()) { (ContactMechWorker.java line 606) Can it be simplified to

Not able to login with ofbiz password for https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org:8443/catalog/control/checkLogin

Hello All, Getting error while login on the demo trunk so please provide correct password. Regards Jaideep Singh