On 04/18/2012 02:57 AM, jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Wed Apr 18 07:57:46 2012
New Revision: 1327411
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1327411view=rev
Log:
Removed bin folder and moved its content to the tools folder: this was
discussed extensively in the dev list
On 04/18/2012 10:55 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Le 18/04/2012 17:21, Adam Heath a écrit :
On 04/18/2012 02:57 AM, jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Wed Apr 18 07:57:46 2012
New Revision: 1327411
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1327411view=rev
Log:
Removed bin folder
On 04/18/2012 11:56 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 4/18/2012 5:43 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 04/18/2012 10:55 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Le 18/04/2012 17:21, Adam Heath a écrit :
On 04/18/2012 02:57 AM, jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Wed Apr 18 07:57:46 2012
New Revision
On 04/18/2012 12:20 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Things have changed in ofbiz, so that now it takes a *huge* amount of
time. Some of that is related to a larger amount of code overflowing
the cpu's L2 cache. Some of that is related to catalina startup, when
it tries to seed the sessions randomness
On 04/18/2012 12:28 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 18, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
ps: I am going to switch if in ant *back* to javascript, *away* from
ant-contrib. The latter is significantly slower when using a system
installed ant.
No please, don't do that.
I've pointed
On 04/18/2012 12:46 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 04/18/2012 12:28 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 18, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
ps: I am going to switch if in ant *back* to javascript, *away*
from
ant-contrib. The latter is significantly
See attached file.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ?
testsuites
testsuite errors=4 failures=0 hostname=adam-ofbiz-testing id=11 name=jcrtests package= tests=17 time=4.851 timestamp=2012-04-18T19:02:03
properties /
testcase classname=org.ofbiz.jcr.test.JackrabbitTests
On 04/18/2012 03:28 PM, Brajesh Patel wrote:
Hello All,
I am looking into Sagepay related stuff:
Currently we have Sagepay payment gateway integration in OOTB,
We have requirement for PCI with tokenization in sage pay.
I am thinking that we need to add 'SagepayPaymentMethod' entity,
On 04/18/2012 09:14 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
Nice, I ran into a problem related to this very recently. Thanks for taking
care of it.
view-entity
member-entity entity-name=Foo
view-entity
view-entity entity-name=Foo
member-entity alias=A entity-name=Bar
member-entity alias=B
On 04/18/2012 11:33 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 18, 2012, at 7:37 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 04/18/2012 12:28 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 18, 2012, at 7:20 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
ps: I am going to switch if in ant *back* to javascript, *away* from
ant-contrib. The latter
On 04/19/2012 12:58 AM, sascharodek...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sascharodekamp
Date: Thu Apr 19 05:58:29 2012
New Revision: 1327835
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1327835view=rev
Log:
Fix jackrabbit unit testing.
Modified:
On 04/19/2012 02:06 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
When building the trunk I get (amonst others) following notifications:
classes:
[javac16] Compiling 140 source files to
/ci/ofbiz/framework/entity/build/classes
[javac16]
a SSD in your laptop Jacopo?
Jacques
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
On Apr 18, 2012, at 6:55 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 18, 2012, at 6:43 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
It currently takes my desktop 1 hour to
run a full test suite. clean, load-demo(30m), run-tests
As some may have noticed, I recently changed the way ofbiz creates
password hashes when it stores them in the database. Each time a new
password is created, a bit of randomness is used, to create a
random-length, random-content salt. This is placed at the beginning
of the hashed password, stored
commit 6493e4845f2acab9ce3e1f92cdc7f5b62bb79a2f
Author: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
Date: Sun Dec 5 18:32:01 2010 -0600
Deprecate GenericValue.getRelatedDummyPK(String).
Still more api simplification. Fortunately, this is a very small
change. It seems that this method
I have a series of patches that enable ofbiz to be used as an openid
*provider*. I used this to allow a wordpress site to delegate
authentication to ofbiz(the company in question already had an ofbiz
deployment hooked into their internal ldap, with phone/name synching;
didn't want to duplicate
On 04/19/2012 03:43 AM, jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Thu Apr 19 08:43:54 2012
New Revision: 1327866
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1327866view=rev
Log:
Reverted rev. 1327736: with it it was impossible to log in with demo accounts.
Ok, then the test cases suck.
On 04/19/2012 04:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Adam,
The recent trend is to slim down OFBiz. This could be one of the
Apache OFBiz Extras
If someone needs it it pick up from there, et voilà
There are multiple layers. framework/openid, which has the basic
logic, but not any of the AX
are rather straight forward, just
moving code around. When I finally get around to adding the new
features, then there is a very definate chance of breaking stuff.
Jacques
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
As some may have noticed, I recently changed the way ofbiz creates
password hashes when
On 04/19/2012 04:41 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Committed at revision: 1328122
Jacques
This change would be needed for anything dealing with PAN(credit-card
number for those not into the lingo).
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
Nope, I'd not have raised a warning else ;o)
On 04/19/2012 04:49 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 04/19/2012 04:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Looking forward for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1151
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2729
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3006
2729 doesn't apply for what I am
On 04/19/2012 04:55 PM, Brett Palmer wrote:
Adam,
There was a previous thread on the subject of implementing other
authentication and security models to support OpenId, LDAP, and
other custom authentication needs. The subject of the thread was
Alternatives to using UserLoginId as a primary
On 04/19/2012 06:13 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
On 20/04/2012, at 9:49 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 04/19/2012 04:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Looking forward for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1151
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2729
https://issues.apache.org/jira
On 04/19/2012 10:39 PM, Sam Hamilton wrote:
Hey Guys,
We are soon going to need OAuth support to allow external users to
log into OFBiz Ecommerce site, which I believe is similar in design
to openid. Just wondering if you considered using Apache Shiro
http://shiro.apache.org/ to help manage the
On 04/20/2012 12:53 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Hi Adam,
How would that be? That would be one per tenant in a multi-tenant setup? I
can imagine in a multi-tenant setup with the db backend not on derby (as we
all recommend) the upgrade/migration aspect can be enormous. Even more so
in a HAFO-setup.
On 04/20/2012 01:32 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Sam,
What proposes Adam is not exactly related. He proposes to introduce a
way for OFBiz to be an OpenId server..
And yes we already discussed about using Shiro in OFBiz. But we also
agreed recently to focus our efforts on the slim down action...
On 04/20/2012 09:56 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Hi Adam,
I can follow your reasoning. And it seems reasonable. But I would like to
suggest to you to create a JIRA for this where patches are uploaded and can
be tested in a separate ofbiz instantiation. This would then help with the
creation of
On 04/20/2012 11:54 AM, Brajesh Patel wrote:
Thanks Adam for your valuable comment,
I found token related information for the sagepay from
http://www.sagepay.com/token-system site as follows:
Token System is a safe way of keeping card details without actually storing
them. We store and
On 04/20/2012 12:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Not sure you noticed but Builbot is no longer running
http://ci.apache.org/waterfall?show_events=falsebranch=builder=ofbiz-trunkreload=none
Yeah, noticed that buildbot wasn't emailing. Looking at that link, it
appears that isis_ubuntu is offline.
On 04/20/2012 04:33 PM, er...@apache.org wrote:
Author: erwan
Date: Fri Apr 20 21:33:02 2012
New Revision: 1328517
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328517view=rev
Log:
OFBIZ-4828 R10.04 testports in use when testing in CI (Jenkins)
Um, no, don't do this.
Modified:
On 04/20/2012 05:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 04/20/2012 04:33 PM, er...@apache.org wrote:
Author: erwan
Date: Fri Apr 20 21:33:02 2012
New Revision: 1328517
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328517view=rev
Log:
OFBIZ-4828 R10.04 testports
On 04/22/2012 03:53 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 4/20/2012 9:00 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 04/20/2012 12:13 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Not sure you noticed but Builbot is no longer running
http://ci.apache.org/waterfall?show_events=falsebranch=builder=ofbiz-trunkreload=none
Yeah, noticed
On 04/23/2012 08:40 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Adrian,
the issue you are experiencing is interesting and I had a look at it; I was
only able to recreate the same failures by changing the timeouts in
UtilCacheTests.java at line 302 and 308; instead of:
cache.setExpireTime(100); // line
On 04/24/2012 03:06 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
This is really weird... I am wondering if there are issues caused by
concurrent threads accessing the cache but the JUnit tests should be all
executed in the same thread... so this should not be the case.
The tests run in the foreground, yes,
I came in like a storm, but then got quiet for a short while. I'm
back to announce that I just had a successful first-run load-demo,
with key-encrypting-key working. I've got 28(or so) changes upto
today. Splitting this last little bit will add another 10(I got
sidetracked on making
[trying to stop this thread a bit]
If the root cause *is* a time-slice issue, the fix is to *not*
increase the timeout. Dead stop. Changing the timeout will just
cause it to again fail at some point in the future when computers get
faster yet again.
The correct fix is to make the timeout *not
On 05/02/2012 04:48 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
This is really great news Adam, thanks for the effort!
I still have a ton of testing to do; I need to clone some oldish-type
ofbiz installs that have credit cards, apply my patch(s), then see
what happens.
How did you finally handle the length of
On 04/27/2012 02:50 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Reverted, it did not compile, thanks to Amit Sharma who called me
Sometimes it's not possible to backport a fix for a file bug; there
can be lots of other dependant patches that are required, that are too
unstable(or just not wanted) for a released
On 05/02/2012 05:26 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 2, 2012, at 11:32 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
If the root cause *is* a time-slice issue, the fix is to *not*
increase the timeout. Dead stop. Changing the timeout will just
cause it to again fail at some point in the future when computers
On 05/03/2012 12:56 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 04/27/2012 02:50 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Reverted, it did not compile, thanks to Amit Sharma who called me
Sometimes it's not possible to backport a fix for a file bug; there
can be lots of other
On 05/03/2012 04:44 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I agree that it is a workaround and not a solution. The problem is,
the tests fail 100% of the time on my development machine, and they
fail intermittently on the ASF CI machine and our (1Tech) CI machine.
So, the workaround is needed to get various
On 05/03/2012 10:44 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Adam,
On May 3, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
So, I'm asking if I can commit these to both trunk
and 12.04. If not, we'd have to wait even longer to fully remove
these methods(at least another year).
I didn't review your patch
On 05/04/2012 12:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Adam,
are you going to backport this (and other relevant commits) to the 12.04
branch as well?
I plan to, yes, but I'm going to finish up the kek(key-encrypting-key)
support first. I've got the code done, just need to do more testing.
On 05/04/2012 11:21 AM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2732
Are all these messages still just testing the new system?
On 05/04/2012 01:44 PM, build...@apache.org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2737
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this
Well, why can't the queue be purged?
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
You'll probably find that it's just playing catch up and will get to the head
soon enough.
Regards
Scott
On 6/05/2012, at 1:22 AM, Adrian
I'll fix it when I get to work.
ps: there are really no test cases for tenants?
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com wrote:
In the framework found the following problem:
in GenericDelegator.java, line 226:
On 05/07/2012 09:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
I'll fix it when I get to work.
ps: there are really no test cases for tenants?
ps: I have a plan for testing the tenant code. Do not start it by
just 'cloning' the existing entitymodels for the tenant. That will
take *way* to long. Instead, create
On 05/07/2012 02:46 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Adam,
Pleaase elaborate on what the unit test(s) should achieve? Creating new
tenants and loading the tenant instantiation with demo data? Or?
All of the above, anything, something. There are no automated test
cases *at all* for tenant anything.
On 05/07/2012 03:40 PM, Pierre Smits wrote:
Given that the tenants use the same codebase and only use a different
delegator than main, you could say that performing unit tests as in a
tenant delegator should get you the same results as doing them in the main
delegator.
But, then there would
On 05/07/2012 04:27 PM, doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Mon May 7 21:27:32 2012
New Revision: 1335268
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1335268view=rev
Log:
FEATURE: Key-encrypting-key(kek) support is now enabled. To enable
support for this, run:
java
I use git(-svn) to do my ofbiz work(as many here probably know).
Currently, the svn is hosted on apache.org servers. When it was
imported, the history was started fresh. This was done back in July,
2006.
However, that wasn't good enough for me. I dug around and found
references to the previous
On 05/08/2012 11:18 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Adam,
I don't know if it is useful but for some time in its history (but I don't
remember the years) the OFBiz project was hosted at dev.java.net,maybe the
url was:
https://ofbiz.dev.java.net/
dev.java.net doesn't exist either.
On 01/27/2011 02:11 PM, David E Jones wrote:
The project was created on SourceForge.net on 13 May
2001. I don't know when the first commit was.
The first preview release (still available on
SourceForge) was ofbiz-2001.05.24.zip which, as the
name implies, was released on 24 May 2001.
On 05/09/2012 06:43 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 01/27/2011 02:11 PM, David E Jones wrote:
The project was created on SourceForge.net on 13 May
2001. I don't know when the first commit was.
The first preview release (still available on
SourceForge) was ofbiz-2001.05.24.zip which, as the
name
On 05/10/2012 11:05 AM, doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Thu May 10 16:05:00 2012
New Revision: 1336768
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1336768view=rev
Log:
FIX: s/run-install/load-demo/
I'm surprised I actually had to do this. It implies that the scripts
are not being
On 05/10/2012 11:13 AM, doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Thu May 10 16:13:23 2012
New Revision: 1336772
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1336772view=rev
Log:
FEATURE/OPTIMIZE: Copied these from the release12.04 branch(using svn copy).
Having to manually add them to
On 05/10/2012 11:16 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The scripts are helpful if you have a Subversion client that runs from
the command line. Some of us use a graphical Subversion client - like
Tortoise, or the Eclipse plugin.
Which brings up another thought I had. Maybe converting these to a
series of
I've added 2 major(ish) new features recently.
* salt-based password hashing(with base64 encoding)
* key-encrypting-key(kek) support.
The salt-based psasword feature was written when JIRA was hacked
several years ago; JIRA is based on an old version of OfBiz, so this
change could be considered a
On 05/10/2012 06:40 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I wanted to discuss this again.
Some time ago I modified my local copy of OFBiz to execute the the ant
run-install task faster by using multi-threaded entity creation and
data loading. I don't remember what i was working on at the time, but
I
On 05/10/2012 06:58 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/11/2012 12:45 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/10/2012 06:40 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I wanted to discuss this again.
Some time ago I modified my local copy of OFBiz to execute the the ant
run-install task faster by using multi-threaded entity creation
On 04/20/2012 07:53 AM, jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Fri Apr 20 12:53:35 2012
New Revision: 1328356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328356view=rev
Log:
The cache of parsed Groovy scripts was not thread safe; this issue, in
instances with several concurrent threads
On 05/10/2012 11:46 PM, ash...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ashish
Date: Fri May 11 04:46:26 2012
New Revision: 1337024
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1337024view=rev
Log:
Applied similar fix as we did on trunk r1300463.
On production systems you can't suppress Debug.log( message by the use
On 05/10/2012 11:51 PM, ash...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ashish
Date: Fri May 11 04:51:55 2012
New Revision: 1337026
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1337026view=rev
Log:
Applied similar fix as we did on trunk r1300463.
On production systems you can't suppress Debug.log( message by the use
On 05/11/2012 12:40 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Adam,
please see inline:
On May 11, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 04/20/2012 07:53 AM, jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Fri Apr 20 12:53:35 2012
New Revision: 1328356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev
On 05/11/2012 08:53 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/11/2012 12:40 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Hi Adam,
please see inline:
On May 11, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 04/20/2012 07:53 AM, jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Fri Apr 20 12:53:35 2012
New Revision: 1328356
URL
On 05/11/2012 09:36 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 11, 2012, at 4:26 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
@@ -177,10 +184,18 @@ public class GroovyUtil {
Class? scriptClass = parsedScripts.get(script);
if (scriptClass == null) {
scriptClass = loadClass(script);
- if (Debug.verboseOn
On 05/11/2012 09:51 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/11/2012 09:36 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 11, 2012, at 4:26 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
@@ -177,10 +184,18 @@ public class GroovyUtil {
Class? scriptClass = parsedScripts.get(script);
if (scriptClass == null) {
scriptClass = loadClass
On 05/11/2012 10:30 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 11, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
==
result = parsedScripts.get(key)
if (result == null) {
syncyronized (parsedScripts) {
result = parsedScripts.get(key)
if (result == null) {
result = genResult
On 05/11/2012 10:49 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 11, 2012, at 5:38 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/11/2012 10:30 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 11, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
==
result = parsedScripts.get(key)
if (result == null) {
syncyronized (parsedScripts
On 05/11/2012 12:30 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 11, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
There is no difference. The act of map.get() can be doing a *lot* of
separate, individual steps. Without any kind of
happens-before/happens-after on map.get(), the protected put/get
As I have discussed, I will be committing a series of separate
commits, that change findByPrimaryKey calls into findOne. I have run
the test cases on these changes, and everything compiles. However,
ofbiz does *not* have 100% coverage, no where close. Some of the
changes are inside groovy/ftl
On 05/11/2012 02:46 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
The UtilCache objects *are* thread-safe. You will not get any
internal corruption inside UtilCache. That is all that can be guaranteed.
What isn't thread safe, is that calling code may end up having
multiple instances for the same key, unless
On 05/11/2012 05:25 AM, adri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: adrianc
Date: Fri May 11 10:25:33 2012
New Revision: 1337103
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1337103view=rev
Log:
Fixed broken Mini-languagecheck-errors element (second try).
Modified:
provide the test
report XML file please?
-Adrian
On 5/12/2012 3:59 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/11/2012 05:25 AM, adri...@apache.org wrote:
Author: adrianc
Date: Fri May 11 10:25:33 2012
New Revision: 1337103
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1337103view=rev
Log:
Fixed broken Mini
On 05/12/2012 07:17 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Okay, rev 1337518 gets the tests to pass, but it isn't a fix - it merely
masks the real problem. I made the commit so others can continue with
their work, and I will continue working on the real problem.
Without going into too much detail, here is a
On 05/12/2012 04:01 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 10, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/10/2012 11:16 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The scripts are helpful if you have a Subversion client that runs from
the command line. Some of us use a graphical Subversion client - like
Tortoise
On 05/12/2012 05:15 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
+1
Though I'd like to keep revert.bat, it's easier to change path (and not
forget) with new release than have to search in build.xml, not a big
deal though...
tools/ant-revert.xml:
./ant revert
./ant -f tools/ant-revert.xml revert
both commands
On 05/12/2012 03:36 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I just meant it's easier to edit revert.bat than to seek for it in the
build.xml when you have to update the path for a new release. Forget it,
sometimes I'm too lazy :o)
I mean the definition for the ant revert command should be in a separate
On 05/12/2012 03:39 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 05/12/2012 04:01 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On May 10, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/10/2012 11:16 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The scripts are helpful if you have a Subversion client that runs
On 05/12/2012 04:04 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
On 05/12/2012 03:36 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I just meant it's easier to edit revert.bat than to seek for it in the
build.xml when you have to update the path for a new release. Forget it,
sometimes I'm too
On 05/12/2012 04:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I'm sure you are both afraid of that, but in case you freithened people
about DCL I wanted to say that since jdk 1.5 way of handling volatile
it's now possible to safely use this pattern with Java
On 05/16/2012 11:30 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/16/2012 11:18 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/16/2012 11:05 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/16/2012 06:41 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/ordermgr/control/orderview?orderId=Demo1002
This may be a stupid question
On 05/17/2012 10:56 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Looks good to me, are you going to attach it to the ticket I have created in
the Freemarker bug tracker?
I'll do it; what's the other bug#? Do we want to bump the severity?
On 05/17/2012 10:57 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/17/2012 10:56 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Looks good to me, are you going to attach it to the ticket I have created in
the Freemarker bug tracker?
I'll do it; what's the other bug#? Do we want to bump the severity?
I'm just waiting
On 05/17/2012 11:48 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
wonderful
I can't seem to attach files to that issue, maybe because I didn't
originally file it. Could you see if you can attach both files?
If you can, but I can't, then the sf tracker is really stupid.
On 05/17/2012 11:50 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/17/2012 12:23 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
file are attached; that bug tracker is really awful.
This is all becoming very troubling.
== example methods
String a(String name, List list) {}
String a(String name, Map map) {}
String a(Object[] args
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I guess Adam is doing a .deb package for OFBiz :o)
Actually, several.
I just recently split the package even further. Before, I had ofbiz
and ofbiz-specialpurpose, as separate debs.
Now, I have ofbiz-framework, ofbiz-applications, and
ofbiz-specialpurpose, with an
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
I discovered that when I split application/framework, that there were
exceptions printed at startup. It tries to load a bunch of freemarker
transforms, but the classes don't exist for that; I'll fix that problem
by using the META-INF/services framework
Adrian Crum wrote:
Each installation is responsible for copying the required driver to the
framework/entity/lib/jdbc folder.
Once the debian packaging is completely done, this won't be a problem.
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
As I understand it, it's a package for Debian. As Ubuntu uses Debian
underneath it will work on Ubuntu too. I'm not a specialist but I saw
some tools to migrate a package between Linux distribution. Not sure of
the quality though, this will certainly improve in the
We've been working toward a framework release. The framework contains
several webapps, all of which require you to log in. This is mostly ok,
because the UserLogin table itself resides in framework.
However, there is only a single login available, system, which has no
password, and is disabled.
BJ Freeman wrote:
David sounds like you stating Linux or Unix rules.
However the Windows version logs you in as administrator privileges so
you can add software (vista).
They don't force you to have a second login that is not an admin level.
Er, the unix way is to give you enough rope to
Bruno Busco wrote:
Adrian,
I would rather prefer having it renamed to CommonX.
pentium
+1.11127834856
/pentium
Harmeet Bedi wrote:
Maybe a good part way would be to support only popular opensource out of
box. You have one - derby. The other 2 mains ones are postgres and mysql.
We have the problem addressed on our end, that is not the concern. Was
trying to see if we can generalize and reduce both our
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
==
---
ofbiz/trunk/framework/webtools/webapp/webtools/WEB-INF/actions/artifactinfo/ArtifactInfo.groovy
(original)
+++
--- ofbiz/trunk/framework/common/config/general.properties (original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/common/config/general.properties Tue Nov 25
11:40:33 2008
@@ -73,6 +73,9 @@
#--Fallback [true|false] determines whether you will allow a non secure
connection if you are unable to get a secure
Adam Heath wrote:
--- ofbiz/trunk/framework/common/config/general.properties (original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/framework/common/config/general.properties Tue Nov 25
11:40:33 2008
@@ -73,6 +73,9 @@
#--Fallback [true|false] determines whether you will allow a non secure
connection if you
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Don't worry Adam, I already reverted in r720161
Thanks for your awareness :o)
Ok, cool. I was looking at my mercurial mirror(1) of ofbiz, saw this
change, then sent the email. Didn't see the later commit.
ps: (1) is updated every 30 minutes from svn.
1:
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Adam,
I used to look into my email client svn folder. I would switch to your
link : clearer, faster and annotated, the only thing I miss is the
ability to search *into* commits, not only titles. Is there a mean to do
that ?
We are still new to mercurial; only been
1 - 100 of 2178 matches
Mail list logo
