I see there is some wordsmithing discussion going on concerning the draft from
Andreas. I confess that it is difficult for me to contribute to that
considering that I find the entire activity one that requires a more global
perspective.
Here are a few observations. I am afraid I have nothing
On 23.02.2015 17:41, Rob Weir wrote:
[ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.
4 PMC votes for this option: Rob,Marcus, Kay and Juergen
Here's another vote (binding) for this alternative.
It looks like Andrea is
It's part of the Go-OO project; apologies for mistakenly contacting
you regarding them. Sounds like we'll probably end up turning them off
and decommissioning them.
Justin
[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go-oo
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On 23/02/15 17:44, Mike Cheung wrote:
Hi, anyone knows if there are anything like Doxygen for OpenOffice? Am
trying to learn how the Calc spreadsheet works by looking at the code on
FishEye but it is rather difficult to work through the logic and dig through
all the hxx and cxx
Thx for the discussion and the work. It is greatly appreciated.
With that said, I still don't see the need or rationale for the
##For Developers section. Removing the last 2 paragraphs
would go a long way in keeping the narrative closer to the
kind of discussion and info that the ASF is known
Sounds good. Thanks for your work.
I don't know if the last 1-2 paragraphs are still not Apache-friendly
enough. Maybe it's better to avoid to state explicitely the anmes (and
abbreviations). Of course, here others can judge better. ;-)
Marcus
Am 02/23/2015 01:15 AM, schrieb Andrea
On 23/02/15 17:10, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I have to state it again: this is not the way I would have written the
page; it is a version of the page that preserves all terms we had on
that page. If we agree on another version I'm very happy.
Is there a need/requirement to preserve all the terms
Logan minni...@g.cofc.edu has asked for review:
Issue 125498: Dead search engines
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125498
Attachment 84532: Removes obsolete search engines.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=84532action=edit
--- Comment #6 from Logan minni...@g.cofc.edu ---
