Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

Hello, for my understanding, beside doing a good build it is necessary to have and totest defined reference builds. The way I see it, it is not easy to do a good build if you didn't have enough practice doing it. I didn't myself any C/C++ build before. So IHMO I will waste time to improve my

[Proposal] Publish Apache Open Office on the apple store.

Hello all, I would like to propose to publish _Open Office_ as _Apache Foundation_ on the Apple store. I am always dissapointed when I see some unknown developer publishes Open Source, and the Project itself is not present. Afaik this costs money (99$/year). Here is a blog post that

Re: Testing 4.1.3

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 12:52:50PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > There were German dictionary changes. In this case, we only update the dictionaries to the latest version available at the time, but there is nothing else to check here, the dictionaries do not belong to the AOO source nor this

Re: Testing 4.1.3

Am 03.10.2016 um 21:52 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > There were German dictionary changes. Can you tell the difference > between de, de_AT, and de_CH? If so, could you perhaps do a test in each > of the other dialects? > There are differences between the german languages spoken and written

Re: In regards to Open Office

On 03.10.2016 12:14, Jörg Schmidt wrote: But [MS Office] OOXML is not what we could label a real open format. There are parts that still refer to proprietary bits. fud, or show me exactly what parts you mean Well, I dont know if it is exactly a fud. There is a cornerstone truce to this. Do

Apache OpenOffice release notification

The Apache OpenOffice project is currently preparing and testing a release candidate, 4.1.3-rc1. The total size of the artifacts, including the binary files, exceeds a gigabyte, so the release policy calls for notifying Infrastructure. I do not expect significant Infrastructure impact because

Re: Infra notification?

Hi Patricia, On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 07:18:30PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > What is the total size of our binaries? Linux 32 12759M Linux 64 13328M Windows 6178M macOS 7185M This includes hashes and signatures. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile signature.asc

Re: Testing 4.1.3

On 10/03/2016 10:20 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi Carl, On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:58:25PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote: On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the

Re: Testing 4.1.3

Hi Carl, On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:58:25PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote: > On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > >I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there > >are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we > >have a complete

Re: Testing 4.1.3

On 10/03/2016 09:58 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate.

Infra notification?

According to http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#heads-up, infra needs to be notified in advance of releases of more than 1GB. What is the total size of our binaries? Do our releases really count for this, because most downloading will be from SourceForge, not ASF mirrors.

Re: Testing 4.1.3

On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we have a complete release candidate.

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

On 10/3/2016 3:30 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 10/03/2016 11:26 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Marcus wrote: wow, *all signed source code packages* ? I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2, the .gz and the .zip. They are

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

Am 10/03/2016 11:26 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Marcus wrote: wow, *all signed source code packages* ? I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2, the .gz and the .zip. They are equivalent. This sentence is for when

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Marcus wrote: wow, *all signed source code packages* ? I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2, the .gz and the .zip. They are equivalent. This sentence is for when a project makes a release composed of different

Re: Translate offline

On 30/09/2016 Claudio Ferreia Filho wrote: i continue doing some translations to AOO, but I saw that translate.apache.org is offline. If someone can do something to warn the infra, is a good thing. It is one of the monitored services by Apache Infra, so notifications are sent out when it is

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

Marcus wrote: wow, *all signed source code packages* ? I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2, the .gz and the .zip. They are equivalent. This sentence is for when a project makes a release composed of different parts. For the record, trunk is already set to

Re: Testing 4.1.3

No problem so far with some use with Writer, Impress and Calc (not much). Both with EN-US core install with French package (on kids account). Hagar Le 25/09/2016 à 20:33, Marcus a écrit : Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I suggest that people start downloading and testing

Re: Testing 4.1.3

Do you know which particular changes I should look for? The dictionaries are from december 2015, so I had them already in use in 4.1.2. But I can confirm that the difference between "schließen" (de/de-AT) and "schliessen" (de-CH) is recognised. Am 03.10.2016 um 21:52 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

Re: Testing 4.1.3

Patricia Shanahan wrote: > I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as > there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period > until we have a complete release candidate. Testing latest 4.1.3 Development en-US on Windows with the following configuration:

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

Am 10/03/2016 09:49 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement for a release. A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs

Re: Georgian Dictionary in Hunspell

Thank you Yakov very much . I will check the resources you have sent to me. Regards, Giorgi On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Yakov Reztsov wrote: > Hello, > I think you can make Georgia hunspell dictionary in UTF-8 encoding. > After creating the hunspell dictionary

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: PMC members please indicate when they have done that test, to help me decide when to start a vote. Done on Linux-64, successful. I've build today that branch with release

Re: Testing 4.1.3

There were German dictionary changes. Can you tell the difference between de, de_AT, and de_CH? If so, could you perhaps do a test in each of the other dialects? On 10/3/2016 12:19 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hello, I installed and tested the german version (de) on: - Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit)

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement for a release. A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs to have built the software from source and tested

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement for a release. A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs to have built the software from source and tested it on a machine under the PMC member's

Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement for a release. A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs to have built the software from source and tested it on a machine under the PMC member's control. See

Re: Testing 4.1.3

Am 10/03/2016 09:19 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel: I installed and tested the german version (de) on: - Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit) - Xubuntu 16.04.1 (32bit) Everything is working as expected. I got a mail from Jan that his tests on Win 7 were successful, too. I hope he can post this also on

Re: Testing 4.1.3

Hello, I installed and tested the german version (de) on: - Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit) - Xubuntu 16.04.1 (32bit) Everything is working as expected. regards Matthias Am 03.10.2016 um 13:29 schrieb Mechtilde: > Hello, > > I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de. > > I did also some work

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.1.4 Release Manager?

+1 :) Keith N. McKenna schrieb am Mo., 3. Okt. 2016, 18:09: > Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > >> There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release > >> manager to decide on

Re: Issue 63419 - New dialog control property Multiline has bad name in IDE

Well, I would like to check first if the report is an issue or not. I am happy with the Answer as is for now. John D'Orazio schrieb am Mo., 3. Okt. 2016, 16:53: > > > > does someon know where to find the IDE dialog Properties panel? > >> > > > > Create a

Re: Georgian Dictionary in Hunspell

Hello, I think you can make Georgia hunspell dictionary in UTF-8 encoding. After creating the hunspell dictionary it needs to be packed to OpenOffice extension like this: http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice The author of this expansion has created a

Re: Issue 63419 - New dialog control property Multiline has bad name in IDE

> > does someon know where to find the IDE dialog Properties panel? >> > > Create a new dialog in the Basic IDE or open an existing dialog. (Please > note that the dialogs that comes with AOO are loaded in read-only mode. So > you don't can open the properties for a control.) > Select a control

Re: Testing 4.1.3

Out of an irresistible curiosity I built my own ApacheOO in Debian Unstable (Sid). It took me several build iterations, starting out with trunk and proceeding to: svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO413 On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Rory O'Farrell

Re: Testing 4.1.3

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:29:26 +0200 Mechtilde wrote: > Hello, > > I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de. > > I did also some work with it without problems > > Regards > > Mechtilde I installed the Linux x86-64 DEB en-GB and am using it for routine text editing on

Georgian Dictionary in Hunspell

Hello OpenOffice, I'm Giorgi Vakhtangishvili, writing to you from Tbilisi, Georgia. Didn't know who to write to and on which mail, so here I am. We are the team of developers who work on different RnD projects from Georgia. The reason for me writing to you is that, there's is one big problem in

Re: Updates

Am 10/02/2016 10:57 PM, schrieb David Batchelor: I am using open office 4.1.2 and I love this product very much. thank you :-) We appreciate this very much. How do I automatically or manually update any and all new versions that may come in the future? For a new version you need to

Re: Testing 4.1.3

Hello, I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de. I did also some work with it without problems Regards Mechtilde Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus: > Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus: >> Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >>> I suggest that people start

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.1.4 Release Manager?

Am 09/30/2016 07:15 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote: There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release manager to decide on them. If nobody steps in, and/or nobody has any

Re: Issue 63419 - New dialog control property Multiline has bad name in IDE

Hello Peter! does someon know where to find the IDE dialog Properties panel? Create a new dialog in the Basic IDE or open an existing dialog. (Please note that the dialogs that comes with AOO are loaded in read-only mode. So you don't can open the properties for a control.) Select a

Re: In regards to Open Office

+1 exactly, that's what I meant and a little bit is my opinion also: MS is not longer a _fundamental_ opponent of free software more and a very little bit is my opinion also: MS is one of our "Platinum sponsors" and it is not a good style blindly to grumble about MS Greetings, Jörg

Re: In regards to Open Office

> -Original Message- > From: Xen [mailto:l...@xenhideout.nl] > Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2016 7:29 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: In regards to Open Office > > Rory O'Farrell schreef op 02-10-2016 15:59: > > Top posting: > > > > This thread is going off at half

Issue 63419 - New dialog control property Multiline has bad name in IDE

Hi, does someon know where to find the IDE dialog Properties panel? I do not know what the modul udk is? I am not sure if this became obsolete with time. all the best Peter