Re: Question -- building AOO 4.1.3 on Windows

Also want to post my bootstrap log. Seems like some resources are out of date. Can someone update them? $ ./bootstrap ./bootstrap: line 37: unalias: nmake: not found ./bootstrap: line 38: unalias: gunzip: not found Include locations: /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.22/i686-cygwin-threads-64int

Re: Question -- building AOO 4.1.3 on Windows

In the end I figured out I was missing perl-Net-SSLeay. Since perl-LWP-Protocol depends on perl-Net-SSLeay (according to the screenshot), apy-cyg should install perl-Net-SSLeay while installing perl-LWP-Protocol, but it did not. I suggest let configure output perl -e 'use LWP::Protocol::https',

Re: Community building: give our User a chance to contribute!

Am 23.01.2017 um 03:00 schrieb toki: > On 01/22/2017 09:20 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > >> When LibreOffice forked that code, as the license allowed, some were unhappy >> in any case. > > The sequence was: > * Star Office: Owned by StarDivision, a German corporation; AFAIK the story

Re: Community building: give our User a chance to contribute!

> From: toki [mailto:toki.kant...@gmail.com] > * GoOo: The fork that wasn't. Oh, that was a fork! A fork against OpenOffice. Let's not forget the involvement of Novell and the Novell-Microsoft-deal. I will never forget how Michael Meek's SUN and OpenOffice.org attacked and later his

Re: Question -- building AOO 4.1.3 on Windows

Hi Install the perl-LWP-Protocol-https package using Cygwin or apt-cyg. On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Hong wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > The error is still the same, except for the wording is a little different. > > > > Attached the config.log and output. In the meantime I

Re: Google Summer Of Code 2017

Hi Yakov; I have mentored previously for other organizations. I could consider mentoring this year if there is an interesting project. Regards, Pedro. Is it planned in this season participated Apache Open Office in Google Summer Of Code ?

Re: Community building: give our User a chance to contribute!

> From: Mathias Röllig [mailto:mroellig.n...@gmx.net] > > What "original OpenOffice" is thought of here? > > The „original“ was StarOffice. And yes, you described right > the way of > the „original“ OpenOffice – as I understand it as a user (with many > contacts to

Re: If the list of PMC members up to date?

> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 5:29 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: If the list of PMC members up to date? > > If you want to communicate to the full PMC, send a message to > private@ oo.a.o. Thank you, but: No, not at

Re: Community building: give our User a chance to contribute!

> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org] > I am puzzled a little bit about the idea of "loyalty to the > original" OpenOffice. > > 1. The original OpenOffice.org was operated by a proprietary > company, although the code was made available as open-source. > But ownership was

Re: FYI: github mirror is broken

On 31/12/2016 Pedro Giffuni wrote: The github mirror stopped updating the source tree over 10 months ago. This was a known issue, reported months ago, but (unexpectedly) Infra found the time to fix it earlier this week, so the broken Github non-mirror is now a mirror again; see

Re: Community building: give our User a chance to contribute!

I am puzzled a little bit about the idea of "loyalty to the original" OpenOffice. 1. The original OpenOffice.org was operated by a proprietary company, although the code was made available as open-source. But ownership was held by Sun Microsystems for their proprietary purposes. There was

RE: Community building: give our User a chance to contribute!

I am puzzled a little bit about the idea of "loyalty to the original" OpenOffice. 1. The original OpenOffice.org was operated by a proprietary company, although the code was made available as open-source. But ownership was held by Sun Microsystems for their proprietary purposes. There was

Google Summer Of Code 2017

Is it planned in this season participated Apache Open Office in Google Summer Of Code ? https://opensource.googleblog.com/2017/01/now-accepting-organization-applications.html -- Yakov Reztsov

RE: If the list of PMC members up to date?

If you want to communicate to the full PMC, send a message to private@ oo.a.o. Do not cross-post. But communicating here on dev@ oo.a.o is also fine. For discussions about broader ASF matters, subscribe to d...@community.apache.org For more details of the PMC membership, see

Re: Question -- building AOO 4.1.3 on Windows

Hi Damjan, The error is still the same, except for the wording is a little different. Attached the config.log and output. In the meantime I will be looking at the script as well. If I find something wrong, I will let you know.​ On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic

hint: Funding of programmers in Germany

Hello, Here is another tip. prototypefund.de supports software developers, see: https://prototypefund.de/ or https://prototypefund.de/en/ You can also apply for programmers who want to program OpenOffice. A maximum of 30,000 euros can be awarded for each project/programmer. I know the

If the list of PMC members up to date?

Hello, If the list of PMC members up to date? see: http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#openoffice-pmc Greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: Community building: give our User a chance to contribute!

> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > It CAN work! Yes. But it takes very good ideas to have success. > We should have a talk together with Raphael and Peter at FOSDEM 17. Talking together is always good Greetings, Jörg

Re: Community building: give our User a chance to contribute!

Hello, > From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] > IMO Raphael's suggestion will work under Apache rules. It is > normal that > developers of Apache projects are paid by companies etc. to contribute > to the project. I have no doubt about that. But is this the

Re: Community building: give our User a chance to contribute!

Hallo Raphael, > From: Raphael Bircher [mailto:rbircherapa...@gmail.com] > You got here something wrong. It's not needed to make a fork. > You can do > the whole work at Apache OpenOffice. You have only to follow the > Development guide lines of OpenOffice. But that's not a > problem I

Re: Community building: give our User a chance to contribute!

It CAN work! Indeed it does in an even smaller community for several years... We should have a talk together with Raphael and Peter at FOSDEM 17. Kind regards Matthias Am 22.01.2017 um 08:26 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: > Hi, > > IMO Raphael's suggestion will work under Apache rules. It is