Re: ooo-forums downtime

However such things could (IMO should) be noted in upcoming maintenance (i.e. scheduled downtime) On 10 January 2018 at 09:53, Greg Stein wrote: > status.apache.org reports services that are *down*, rather than individual > bugs/problems. > > Thanks, > -g > > On Wed, Jan 10,

Trivial German grammar error on get-involved page.

The get involved page [1] says: Diese Seite in Deutsch I'm not a native German speaker (*), but that looks wrong, IMO it should be Diese Seite auf Deutsch [ansehen] Google Translate is confused. "view This site in German" gives the correct answer, but "view this site in German" and "View this

Re: [DOWNLOAD][PROPOSAL] How to download another version than offered in the green box?

On 7 May 2014 00:10, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 05/06/2014 02:24 AM, schrieb sebb: On 5 May 2014 20:00, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 05/05/2014 01:29 AM, schrieb sebb: On 4 May 2014 17:37, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Another update, seems

Re: [DOWNLOAD][PROPOSAL] How to download another version than offered in the green box?

On 5 May 2014 20:00, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 05/05/2014 01:29 AM, schrieb sebb: On 4 May 2014 17:37, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Another update, seems this weekend I've my productive phase: ;-) http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test

Re: [DOWNLOAD][PROPOSAL] How to download another version than offered in the green box?

On 4 May 2014 17:37, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Another update, seems this weekend I've my productive phase: ;-) http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html What was done: - Grey box: - Bye, bye grey color - hello green freshness. +1 - The

Re: [DOWNLOAD][PROPOSAL] How to download another version than offered in the green box?

On 3 May 2014 10:30, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 05/03/2014 04:05 AM, schrieb sebb: How about presetting the fields according to the autodetected values, where possible? actually I've planned this when the green and grey box will be combined but ... Then if the auto

Re: [DOWNLOAD][PROPOSAL] How to download another version than offered in the green box?

How about presetting the fields according to the autodetected values, where possible? Then if the auto-detection works for some of the fields it will reduce the work for the user. Also if the autodetection works, but the user wants to download for a differnt OS or language it also reduces the

Re: Server status: What's Up; What's Down?

On 24 April 2014 18:21, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote: We had to restore blogs from backups, so some of the latest data was lost. The service is stable again, sorry for the inconvenience this has caused. Status page is currently showing red for ASF blogs... Buildbot/CMS is still

Re: Incubator still has SVN tree

On 23 March 2014 08:52, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: sebb wrote: There is still an SVN tree under Incubator: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ I assume this was all transferred to the main ASF SVN area at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ If so

Re: Incubator still has SVN tree

On 24 March 2014 13:51, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote: On 23.03.2014 09:52, Andrea Pescetti wrote: sebb wrote: There is still an SVN tree under Incubator: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ I assume this was all transferred to the main ASF SVN area at https

Re: How to download your program?

I suspect that what the OP meant to write was: I was in need of an office program for my job applications, and a search on google directed me to your openoffice.I had great difficulties downloading the software on your download site: http://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html I could not find

Incubator still has SVN tree

There is still an SVN tree under Incubator: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ooo/ I assume this was all transferred to the main ASF SVN area at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/ If so, please can someone tidy up the Incubator tree?

Re: New committer: Tsutomu Uchino (hanya)

On 28 December 2013 23:42, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: Hi Hanya, good to see more developers on the PMC. [Pendantic mode] Please note that the PMC is the Project Management Committee. Not all developers who work on the AOO project are members of the PMC. Hope your insights will

Re: Downloading problems with some Browsers

On 30 December 2013 16:25, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: On the en-Forum there have been some reports of Download interrupted, from memory these are mostly from users of Chrome browser. We normally advise use (either permanently or on a one off basis) of Firefox. Not sure that is

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

On 27 December 2013 09:14, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 26/12/2013 Andrea Pescetti wrote: On one browser where I can reproduce the amusing pattern wiki works / forum doesn't, the certificate manager contains the *.apache.org certificate for openoffice.org:443 We now have

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

On 26 December 2013 10:28, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 23/12/2013 sebb wrote: ... http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/FAQ/Installation Confirm with IE, which reports a certificate for *.apache.org (Thawte) I've seen it happening from time to time

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

On 26 December 2013 20:39, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On 26 December 2013 19:17, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 December 2013 10:28, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 23/12/2013 sebb wrote: ... http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/FAQ/Installation

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

On 18 December 2013 14:39, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:24 PM, grumpy rp...@q.com wrote: From this page: http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/java.html taking the link Installation FAQ which goes here:

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

On 23 December 2013 14:05, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 18 December 2013 14:39, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:24 PM, grumpy rp...@q.com wrote: From this page: http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/java.html taking the link Installation FAQ

Re: JIRA instead of Bugzilla?

On 8 November 2013 00:43, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:14 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 22 October 2013 16:41, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.comwrote: Hi, On

Re: RTF

On 19 October 2013 11:17, Patrick pdema...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, I've received this .rtf file (attachment) with a little picture on the left side that i can't see with Open Office. I'm using Ubuntu because I hate Microsoft and all their products :) ... So, in conclusion, my friend (on

Re: [Proposal] Update Icons for AOO 4.1

On 10 October 2013 04:01, Samer Mansour samer...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm proposing to have the icons (and related assets) updated for AOO 4.1 release. I would like to take the responsibility to see this gets done. Here is the icons that need to be updated:

Re: Where can I find the new AOO4-Logo as a vector format?

On 27 September 2013 10:11, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: On 27 September 2013 09:23, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote: But a note: The M in TM is shown cut off and the representation of TM is different in Internet Explorer and Firefox, once serifs, once without serifs, at an

Re: Mails from iss...@openoffice.apache.org

FWIW: AFAICT there are currently 123 251 bugs in the AOO Bugzilla instance. On 12 September 2013 19:33, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 12 September 2013 18:53, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Mechtilde o...@mechtilde.de wrote: Hello What happens? I get

Re: Mails from iss...@openoffice.apache.org

On 12 September 2013 18:53, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Mechtilde o...@mechtilde.de wrote: Hello What happens? I get nearly 6500 mails today with date 07.08.2013. My mail provider ask me, if all things are right ;-) Kind regards I haven't been

Re: Fw: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

I think Max meant to write [Microsoft] Word file and by explorer he meant Windows Explorer not Internet Explorer. You wrote that you were having problems opening certain existing documents. Using Windows Explorer, right-click on one such file. Choose Open With ... and then Choose program

Re: Menu language problem with Wiki

On 11 September 2013 17:49, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Just clicked on OpenOffice Wiki: Documentation area link under http://www.openoffice.org/support/#community-support. The page that is displayed has English body text, but Dutch (I think) for the menu bar. Clicking other languages

Menu language problem with Wiki

Just clicked on OpenOffice Wiki: Documentation area link under http://www.openoffice.org/support/#community-support. The page that is displayed has English body text, but Dutch (I think) for the menu bar. Clicking other languages (under Ander tale) changes the body text, but not the menu.

Re: [CONF] Apache OpenOffice Community Louis Vuitton Evora 100% Authentic 80% Off Free Shipping

On 6 September 2013 17:07, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: We are getting some spam attacks on the cWiki, wonder if we can do some scanning to detect similar pages, and also remove this nick. On the Moin Wikis, anyone can create a Wiki account, but that does not grant them write

User questions on dev mailing list

The dev list sees the occasional thread which IMO really belongs on the user list/forum Although it is convenient for the poster to have the question answered on the dev list, I wonder if that is the best approach overall. The disadvantages of not referring the poster to the user list are

Re: User questions on dev mailing list

On 5 September 2013 12:15, Peter Junge peter.ju...@gmx.org wrote: On 9/5/2013 5:24 PM, sebb wrote: The dev list sees the occasional thread which IMO really belongs on the user list/forum Although it is convenient for the poster to have the question answered on the dev list, I wonder

Re: User questions on dev mailing list

On 5 September 2013 12:00, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 5:24 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The dev list sees the occasional thread which IMO really belongs on the user list/forum Although it is convenient for the poster to have the question answered on the dev

Re: User questions on dev mailing list

kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 6:29 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 September 2013 12:00, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 5:24 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The dev list sees the occasional thread which IMO really belongs on the user list

Re: 4.0.1 release and distribution.

On 3 September 2013 08:05, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 03/09/2013 sebb wrote: Are you suggesting pointing users to the archives for current sigs and hashes? If so, I don't think that's a good idea. Maybe it isn't, but using dist is worse: - Everything that lives on dist

Re: 4.0.1 release and distribution.

On 2 September 2013 09:26, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 9/1/13 4:45 PM, janI wrote: On 1 September 2013 15:31, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 5:42 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 1 September 2013 11:27, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. I had

Re: [discussion] smaller footprint on dist.

On 2 September 2013 09:33, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 9/2/13 12:55 AM, sebb wrote: On 1 September 2013 23:48, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. I am considering how we can have a smaller footprint on dist and mirrors. One of the ideas is to have a pure exe, pure language

Re: 4.0.1 release and distribution.

On 2 September 2013 22:45, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 01/09/2013 Henk P. Penning wrote: For 4.0.0 I added the binaries slowly ; some 4 to 5 languages a day is what the rsync servers can handle. So, it takes 5 days for the quick mirrors plus 2 days for the straglers. Note

Re: [discussion] smaller footprint on dist.

On 2 September 2013 18:26, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 2 September 2013 15:48, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: janI wrote: Would it be possible (and preferable) to make a download page, where the user. a) selected version (exe) b) selected (multiple) languages (language pack

Re: Removing JavaScript from other.html

AFAICT, there is *already* a really good candidate for the download/other.html page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds The tables in the middle are easy to follow and AFAIK contain all the required information. No Javascript needed for the table

Re: 4.0.1 release and distribution.

On 1 September 2013 14:31, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 5:42 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 1 September 2013 11:27, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. I had a talk on #asfinfra today, regarding our upcomming 4.0.1 release. Sync on mirrors takes about a week,

Re: [discussion] smaller footprint on dist.

On 1 September 2013 23:48, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. I am considering how we can have a smaller footprint on dist and mirrors. One of the ideas is to have a pure exe, pure language oxt and pure dictionaries on the physical disk, and the have a more intelligent download page. Would

Re: template troubles in xx pseudo NL website

On 30 August 2013 15:28, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 08:26:51AM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: But one question: what is the strategy on locale detection on the download page for NL pages? It looks like you are hardcoding it to es, but preserving the OS

Re: KEYS

On 30 August 2013 14:48, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: Moving conversation over to the dev list... On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 05:31:35PM -0400, Rob Weir wrote: I wanted to verify the

Re: [RELEASE]: new snapshot build for AOO 4.0.1

On 30 August 2013 21:36, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: The wiki page is updated and for Linux you can find archive builds as

Re: template troubles in xx pseudo NL website

On 29 August 2013 14:49, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: As I mentioned earlier I'm trying to make a self-contained English language website that can copied and translated to make new (or refreshed) NL websites. This includes the 25 or so core pages that should be translated for every

Re: Where do I download Open Office 4.0?

On 26 August 2013 18:47, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:34 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 23 August 2013 14:55, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: Hi Kit, Rory gave you another

Re: [IDEA] Back to School with AOO blog post

On 22 August 2013 18:54, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: It is that time of year now: back to school. I wonder if this could make a good blog post. Of course, AOO being free is core part of the story. But even better

Re: Where do I download Open Office 4.0?

On 23 August 2013 14:55, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: Hi Kit, Rory gave you another link that should work. But so we can debug things more on our end, could you let us know was operating system you are using, and what

Re: Bug 49699 - Remove SPAM attachments

On 21 August 2013 06:31, Rainer Bielefeld i...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote: Hi, This query https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?f1=attachments.submittero1=equalsquery_format=advancedresolution=---v1=non-migrated%40openoffice.orglist_id=82681 shows 201 Bugs with attachments created by user

Re: Should download pages *require* Javascript?

On 19 August 2013 19:44, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:14:08 +0200 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 19/08/2013 sebb wrote: Note that the page http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html also requires Javascript! This is not so good

Re: Should download pages *require* Javascript?

On 20 August 2013 01:20, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 08/19/2013 09:51 PM, schrieb sebb: On 19 August 2013 20:27, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Andrea Pescettipesce

Should download pages *require* Javascript?

The download page at present requires Javascript. Without Javascript, there is no obvious way to download AOO 4.0 at all. Note that the page http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html also requires Javascript! It's nice to be able to use Javascript to guess which download the user wants, but

Re: Example of spreadsheet formula testing

On 19 August 2013 11:41, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote: Hi Jan, janI schrieb: On 19 August 2013 12:24, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de wrote: [..] But for both kind of testing there exists a problem with expected values. For example, calculation of PMT needs expm1

Re: Strange phrase on download page: with other users

On 19 August 2013 11:42, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:16:34 +0100 sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: There are two sentences on the download page which read very oddly to me: 1) Extend your Apache OpenOffice functionality with a large and growing library

Re: Usability: dictionary updates and profile migration

On 19 August 2013 16:39, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Not seeing comments, I'll publish the updated dictionary in a couple of days. In

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

On 17 August 2013 06:35, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: The OpenOffice Forum server will be offline until sometime on Sunday evening (UTC) for major OS and phpBB upgrades Can't the Forum URLs be temporarily redirected to a page that explains this? -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice website

On 17 August 2013 09:01, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: sebb wrote: On 17 August 2013 06:35, Rory O'Farrell wrote: The OpenOffice Forum server will be offline until sometime on Sunday evening (UTC) for major OS and phpBB upgrades Can't the Forum URLs be temporarily redirected

Re: The Names of OpenOffice (How users are finding our website)

On 16 August 2013 12:56, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: And update of data gathered from website visitors. Of the ones who come to our website from a search engine results list (and that is 48% of our total visitors), the top ten search queries, along with a count of recent visitors, are:

Re: Microsoft Censors OpenOffice Download Links

On 16 August 2013 19:44, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:39:16 -0400 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Aug

Re: Issue 122927 -- spreadsheet formula compatibility

On 15 August 2013 14:47, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:41 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On Aug 15, 2013 3:06 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122927 It boils down to how an IF() statements are evaluated.

Re: Issue 122927 -- spreadsheet formula compatibility

On 15 August 2013 15:21, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:07 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 15 August 2013 14:47, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:41 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On Aug 15, 2013 3:06 PM, Rob Weir robw

Re: Some thoughts on quality

On 14 August 2013 23:10, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 08/14/2013 10:05 PM, schrieb Hagar Delest: Le 14/08/2013 21:39, Rob Weir a écrit : Maybe we need to call an earlier build the RC so it will get more

Re: Unnecesary filestructure on images

On 12 August 2013 17:05, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On Aug 12, 2013 3:25 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:35 AM,

Re: [discuss] drop support for Java 5 and Java 6 for Windows

On 8 August 2013 12:23, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:43 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 August 2013 02:26, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:24 AM, janI j

Re: [Build Environment] Windows - build using Java 7 (JDK 1.7) without having Visual Studio

On 7 August 2013 09:33, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: I'm deleting the quotes of the earlier discussion as it is not relevant to my point here. I have no experience of building with Java and care little about the security holes, so I bow to the expertise of those who know better.

Re: [Build Environment] Windows - build using Java 7 (JDK 1.7) without having Visual Studio

On 7 August 2013 11:55, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 7 August 2013 12:51, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 August 2013 09:33, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: I'm deleting the quotes of the earlier discussion as it is not relevant to my point here. I have no experience

Re: Proposal -- AOO 4.0.1 Release

On 7 August 2013 12:55, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 8/7/13 1:51 PM, janI wrote: On 7 August 2013 13:07, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 8/7/13 11:47 AM, janI wrote: On 7 August 2013 11:28, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 8/6/13 6:42 PM, janI

Re: [discuss] drop support for Java 5 and Java 6 for Windows

On 7 August 2013 13:47, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 7 August 2013 14:02, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 07:54:55 -0400 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I

Re: Proposal -- AOO 4.0.1 Release

On 6 August 2013 06:51, O.Felka olaf-openoff...@gmx.de wrote: Am 05.08.2013 23:34, schrieb David Gerard: On 5 August 2013 22:32, janI j...@apache.org wrote: When I consider what I hear in the real world, I would prefer a fast release, solving the most important issues. We always have the

Re: [IDEA] Back to School with AOO blog post

On 6 August 2013 15:56, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 August 2013 15:40, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: It is that time of year now: back to school. I wonder if this could make a good blog post.

Re: Download page could give approximate file size

On 4 August 2013 19:45, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/27/2013 10:14 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 07/27/2013 10:10 PM, schrieb sebb: It might be helpful if the download page showed the approximate file size downloads. This would help users to know how long it might take

Re: Download page could give approximate file size

On 5 August 2013 20:38, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 08/05/2013 07:11 PM, schrieb sebb: On 4 August 2013 19:45, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/27/2013 10:14 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 07/27/2013 10:10 PM, schrieb sebb: It might be helpful if the download

Re: Download page could give approximate file size

On 5 August 2013 22:23, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 08/05/2013 10:24 PM, schrieb sebb: On 5 August 2013 20:38, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 08/05/2013 07:11 PM, schrieb sebb: On 4 August 2013 19:45, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/27/2013 10

Re: Release 3.4.1 storage and incubator removal.

On 31 July 2013 21:31, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/31/2013 03:06 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:33 AM, janIj...@apache.org wrote: Moving conversation to dev@ On 31 July 2013 13:28, Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 7/31/13 1:07 PM, janI

Re: [PROPOSAL] New other.html for all possible download links

/29/2013 10:39 PM, schrieb sebb: On 29 July 2013 21:12, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/29/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb sebb: On 29 July 2013 19:27, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.dewrote: Am 07/26/2013 11:10 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 07/26/2013 10:44 PM, schrieb Andrea

Re: [PROPOSAL] New other.html for all possible download links

On 29 July 2013 19:27, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/26/2013 11:10 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 07/26/2013 10:44 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 25/07/2013 Marcus (OOo) wrote: I've created a new webpage to offer all possible download links for a release version:

Re: [PROPOSAL] New other.html for all possible download links

On 29 July 2013 21:12, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/29/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb sebb: On 29 July 2013 19:27, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/26/2013 11:10 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 07/26/2013 10:44 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 25/07/2013 Marcus (OOo

[Website] http://www.openoffice.org/download/legacy/index.html

I hope this is the right place to report this. There does not seem to be a Bugzilla category for website content, and Contact Us only refers to website technical issues. http://www.openoffice.org/download/legacy/index.html has the following sentences: 1) It's highly recommended not to use them

[website] http://www.openoffice.org/qa/issue_handling/submission_gateway.html

There is a broken link on http://www.openoffice.org/qa/issue_handling/submission_gateway.html The link entitled ... the OpenOffice.org infrastructure(including the website, the wiki, mailing lists, etc.) leads to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/enter_bug.cgi?product=wwwversion=current which

Re: [Website] http://www.openoffice.org/download/legacy/index.html

On 27 July 2013 11:08, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: I hope this is the right place to report this. There does not seem to be a Bugzilla category for website content, and Contact Us only refers to website technical issues. http://www.openoffice.org/download/legacy/index.html has

Re: unassign BZ issues.

On 27 July 2013 11:47, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi @rob, you are the BZ expert, is it possible to automate a BZ process, that unassigns BZ issues, assigned to a person but untouched for a year ? see https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122035 I think its important, that issues

Re: unassign BZ issues.

On 27 July 2013 12:10, janI j...@apache.org wrote: On 27 July 2013 12:54, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 27 July 2013 11:47, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi @rob, you are the BZ expert, is it possible to automate a BZ process, that unassigns BZ issues, assigned to a person

Re: unassign BZ issues.

On 27 July 2013 13:56, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/27/2013 02:16 PM, schrieb sebb: On 27 July 2013 12:10, janIj...@apache.org wrote: On 27 July 2013 12:54, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 27 July 2013 11:47, janIj...@apache.org wrote: Hi @rob, you are the BZ expert

Re: [website] http://www.openoffice.org/qa/issue_handling/submission_gateway.html

On 27 July 2013 15:25, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/27/2013 12:11 PM, schrieb sebb: There is a broken link on http://www.openoffice.org/qa/issue_handling/submission_gateway.html The link entitled ... the OpenOffice.org infrastructure(including the website, the wiki

Re: [Website] http://www.openoffice.org/download/legacy/index.html

Thanks for the very prompt response, all looks good now. On 27 July 2013 15:16, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/27/2013 12:15 PM, schrieb sebb: On 27 July 2013 11:08, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: I hope this is the right place to report this. There does not seem

Re: Checksum doesn't match

On 27 July 2013 20:48, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/27/2013 08:10 PM, schrieb Maritta Coppieters: Hi, trying to download open office 4.0.0, can't get it to install. It looks like the md5 checksum doesn't match, any known issues? I'm on a Toshiba Satellite L855D 64 bit,

Re: [Request for help][Download] Download AOO via mobile devices?

On 27 July 2013 21:19, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Sometimes we get comments from users like I cannot find AOO for my iPhone or similar. Instead of leaving them alone I've started to update the DL scripting to recognize platforms and operating systems that AOO does not support.

Re: dev@openoffice.apache.org

Maybe the link to the user documentation should be a lot more obvious on the download page ... or could the download process take the user to the documentation area while (or after) the download completes? On 27 July 2013 21:56, Clarence M Weaver cmweav...@gmail.com wrote: You can find the