Re: Future - Digital Signatures

2021-10-01 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
Hello, On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 02:14:54PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Sep 29, 2021, at 4:25 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Sep 29, 2021, at 1:05 PM, Arrigo Marchiori > >> wrote: > >> > >> Hello Dave, All, > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 03:35:30PM -0700, Dave Fisher

Re: Future - Digital Signatures

2021-09-30 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Sep 29, 2021, at 4:25 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> On Sep 29, 2021, at 1:05 PM, Arrigo Marchiori >> wrote: >> >> Hello Dave, All, >> >> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 03:35:30PM -0700, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >>> Hi Pedro, >>> >>> I think that AOO42X and Trunk need to improve in three

Re: Future - Digital Signatures

2021-09-30 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Sep 29, 2021, at 5:01 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 29, 2021, at 4:42 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: >> >> Hi Dave, >> >> Dave Fisher schrieb am 30.09.2021 um 00:11: >>> This document was not signed using the ODF 1.2 or 1.3 specification. >>> Instead

Re: Future - Digital Signatures

2021-09-29 Thread Dave Fisher
Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 29, 2021, at 4:42 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > Dave Fisher schrieb am 30.09.2021 um 00:11: >> This document was not signed using the ODF 1.2 or 1.3 specification. Instead >> LO implements its own extension. >> PGPData >>

Re: Future - Digital Signatures

2021-09-29 Thread Regina Henschel
Hi Dave, Dave Fisher schrieb am 30.09.2021 um 00:11: This document was not signed using the ODF 1.2 or 1.3 specification. Instead LO implements its own extension. PGPData xmlns:loext="urn:org:documentfoundation:names:experimental:office:xmlns:loext:1.0” Which version of LibreOffice? For

Re: Future - Digital Signatures

2021-09-29 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Sep 29, 2021, at 9:10 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> On Sep 29, 2021, at 8:59 AM, Pedro Lino >> wrote: >> >> Hi Dave >> >>> On 09/28/2021 11:35 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >>> I think that AOO42X and Trunk need to improve in three ways. >>> >>> (1) We need to make sure that we

Re: Future - Digital Signatures

2021-09-29 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Sep 29, 2021, at 1:05 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Hello Dave, All, > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 03:35:30PM -0700, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> Hi Pedro, >> >> I think that AOO42X and Trunk need to improve in three ways. >> >> (1) We need to make sure that we hook to the systems native

Re: Future - Digital Signatures

2021-09-29 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
Hello Dave, All, On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 03:35:30PM -0700, Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > I think that AOO42X and Trunk need to improve in three ways. > > (1) We need to make sure that we hook to the systems native key store and/or > a Mozilla keystone. > Setup may need to be

Re: Future - Digital Signatures

2021-09-29 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Sep 29, 2021, at 8:59 AM, Pedro Lino > wrote: > > Hi Dave > >> On 09/28/2021 11:35 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > >> I think that AOO42X and Trunk need to improve in three ways. >> >> (1) We need to make sure that we hook to the systems native key store and/or >> a Mozilla keystone. >>

Re: Future - Digital Signatures

2021-09-29 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Dave > On 09/28/2021 11:35 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > I think that AOO42X and Trunk need to improve in three ways. > > (1) We need to make sure that we hook to the systems native key store and/or > a Mozilla keystone. > Setup may need to be improved. > (2) We need to allow a PGP and EU

Future - Digital Signatures

2021-09-28 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi Pedro, I think that AOO42X and Trunk need to improve in three ways. (1) We need to make sure that we hook to the systems native key store and/or a Mozilla keystone. Setup may need to be improved. (2) We need to allow a PGP and EU card key to be selected and converted to X509