Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files

I have updated the Maven bundles with sources from AOO412 tag. I re-created the javadocs from them because I couldn't find complete docs in the SDK. If everyone agrees we do not need a vote, how to proceed? I could do a new lazy consensus topic until the end of next week to give everyone

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files

to:cmar...@apache.org] >> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 04:03 >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files >> >> I have updated the Maven bundles with sources from AOO412 tag. >> >> I re-created t

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files

Thanks Dennis, Comments below. On 12/11/2015 12:42 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: I have no idea how much ceremony is needed for this. Let's see what others have to say. Thanks for the recreation of the JavaDocs. I think the lazy consensus could work. It is a para-/quasi-distribution

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files

Hi Dave, https://www.openoffice.org/API/docs/java/ref/overview-summary.html Any idea how the javadoc is integrated? Thanks, Carl On 12/11/2015 06:29 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi, This is great work. I'll note that the apidocs should be bundled into the website. See

RE: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files

ev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files > > Hi Dave, > > https://www.openoffice.org/API/docs/java/ref/overview-summary.html > > Any idea how the javadoc is integrated? > > Thanks, > Carl > > On 12/11/2015 06:

RE: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files

t: Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files > > I have updated the Maven bundles with sources from AOO412 tag. > > I re-created the javadocs from them because I couldn't find complete > docs in the SDK. > > If everyone agrees we do not need a vote, how to proceed?

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files

Carl Marcum wrote: I thought these would be the most up to date. I understand now the 4.1.2 was on a branch and trunk may not be the latest. Trunk is the latest, but in a different way. It was being developed before and after 4.1.2, separately from 4.1.2 (where we just picked some fixes

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files

On 04/12/2015 Carl Marcum wrote: I have created Maven bundles for the four Java UNO jar files previously released by OpenOffice.org v3.2.1. juh-4.1.2-bundle.jar [1], jurt-4.1.2-bundle.jar [2], ridl-4.1.2-bundle.jar [3], unoil.jar-4.1.2-bundle.jar [4] and additionally

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files

Dennis, Since this a release of primarily pre-built binaries that are already included with AOO I need some guidance on the requirements. They are libraries so they can't be run for testing. Maybe if someone uses them as libraries they could test them that way. Three of them can be built

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files

Hello Carl; Great job so far! I agree they should be voted as a bundle. In the future we should just build this stuff along with the release and it would be automatic part of the release engineering process. In that order of ideas, the .pom files should be uploaded to SVN even if they are

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files

Hi Pedro, I still need to document the steps I took and hopefully someone knowledgeable with the build process could add in the extra steps during the Jar process. Thanks, Carl On 12/04/2015 10:27 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hello Carl; Great job so far! I agree they should be voted as a

RE: [DISCUSS] Maven Repo Release of Java UNO Jar Files

Carl, Thanks for everything you are doing to provide these useful components for others. I suggest waiting over the weekend to ensure that any and all concerns/suggestions are heard. I don't see any reason against voting on the distribution of these as a bundle. It would be useful to discuss