Re: [Website] French documentation files are missing

Hi, Done! Sorry for the inconvenience... Should be visible again soon. Regards,    Matthias Am 23.06.21 um 21:44 schrieb Bidouille: > Hello all, > > We have a lot of broken links on > http://www.openoffice.org/fr/Documentation/Calc/ > Some PDF/ODT files are missing > Seems to be not

Re: Website url

Hi Bidouille - This has been fixed. It was a DNS issue. Thanks again for the report. Regards, Dave > On Mar 24, 2021, at 1:07 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > I’ve submitted a ticket to make openoffice.org requests redirect to > www.openoffice.org > >> On Mar 24, 2021, at 12:26 PM, Dave Fisher

Re: Website url

I’ve submitted a ticket to make openoffice.org requests redirect to www.openoffice.org > On Mar 24, 2021, at 12:26 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Confirmed. I’m checking with Infrastructure. > >> On Mar 24, 2021, at 12:22 PM, Bidouille wrote: >> >> Hello folks, >> >> Something wrong if you

Re: Website url

Confirmed. I’m checking with Infrastructure. > On Mar 24, 2021, at 12:22 PM, Bidouille wrote: > > Hello folks, > > Something wrong if you access to https://openoffice.org/ > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Website not available

Hi - Yes. I worked with ASF Infra team to resync OpenOffice.org. The trick was to make a trivial change to the README.md on the asf-site branch of GitHub.com/apache/openoffice-org then wait a few minutes for 12GB to copy. Thanks everyone for the report. Regards, Dave > On Feb 4, 2021, at

Re: Website not available

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:27 AM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi all, > > Am 04.02.21 um 16:09 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > It was down for some time, then recovered and now it reports > > > > Forbidden > > You don't have permission to access this resource. > > Confirmed from Germany. > > > > > > >> On

Re: Website not available

And now it is back... Am 04.02.21 um 16:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi all, > > Am 04.02.21 um 16:09 schrieb Pedro Lino: >> It was down for some time, then recovered and now it reports >> >> Forbidden >> You don't have permission to access this resource. > Confirmed from Germany. > >> >>> On

Re: Website not available

Hi all, Am 04.02.21 um 16:09 schrieb Pedro Lino: > It was down for some time, then recovered and now it reports > > Forbidden > You don't have permission to access this resource. Confirmed from Germany. > > >> On 02/04/2021 3:05 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> >> Hi - >> >> It’s available here

Re: Website not available

It was down for some time, then recovered and now it reports Forbidden You don't have permission to access this resource. > On 02/04/2021 3:05 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > > > Hi - > > It’s available here in the US. Would someone check in Europe. > > Thanks, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone >

Re: Website not available

It's back. Am 04.02.2021 um 16:05 schrieb Dave Fisher: Hi - It’s available here in the US. Would someone check in Europe. Thanks, Dave Sent from my iPhone On Feb 4, 2021, at 6:39 AM, Joost Andrae wrote: Hi, it seems that www.openoffice.org cannot be accessed in the moment.

Re: Website not available

Hi - It’s available here in the US. Would someone check in Europe. Thanks, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 4, 2021, at 6:39 AM, Joost Andrae wrote: > > Hi, > > it seems that www.openoffice.org cannot be accessed in the moment. > > https://openoffice.apache.org/ is available > > Kind

RE: Website Migrations

Hello, > -Original Message- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2020 10:01 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Website Migrations [...] As promised, I have added the pages of the de-pages to the wiki, which will be

Re: 4.2.0 on the 20th Anniversary? (was Re: Website Migrations)

Hi Gavin, Am 13.07.20 um 11:35 schrieb Gavin McDonald: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 5:45 AM Keith N. McKenna > wrote: > >> Not only that, but running a search on Bugzilla looking at Issues marked >> as Milestone 4.2.0 there are 267 items. That is a lot of items, some may >> have been

Re: 4.2.0 on the 20th Anniversary? (was Re: Website Migrations)

Hi, On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 5:45 AM Keith N. McKenna wrote: > > Not only that, but running a search on Bugzilla looking at Issues marked > as Milestone 4.2.0 there are 267 items. That is a lot of items, some may > have been already done, others may be hanging out there unfinished for > whatever

RE: Website Migrations

Hello, > -Original Message- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2020 10:01 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Website Migrations > > We should proceed with great care, because some of xxx's > website conten

Re: 4.2.0 on the 20th Anniversary? (was Re: Website Migrations)

Hi Pedro, Matthias, and all; Please see comments in line On 7/12/2020 6:08 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Pedro, > > Am 13.07.20 um 00:04 schrieb Pedro Lino: >> Hi Matthias, all >> >>> What we must not forget is that on October 13th we have the 20 >>> anniversary of OpenOffice.org. >>> >>> One

Re: 4.2.0 on the 20th Anniversary? (was Re: Website Migrations)

Hi Pedro, Am 13.07.20 um 00:04 schrieb Pedro Lino: > Hi Matthias, all > >> What we must not forget is that on October 13th we have the 20 >> anniversary of OpenOffice.org. >> >> One way or the other, we need a working website around that time. >> >> Additionally I would like to release AOO 4.1.8

4.2.0 on the 20th Anniversary? (was Re: Website Migrations)

Hi Matthias, all > What we must not forget is that on October 13th we have the 20 > anniversary of OpenOffice.org. > > One way or the other, we need a working website around that time. > > Additionally I would like to release AOO 4.1.8 and we must have a > working download page for that. >

Re: Website Migrations

Hi - > On Jul 12, 2020, at 1:49 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > > Hello, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org] >> Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2020 8:48 PM >> To: dev >> Subject: Website Migrations >> >> Hi - >> >> [...] > > We should proceed with great care,

Re: Website Migrations

Hi all, What we must not forget is that on October 13th we have the 20 anniversary of OpenOffice.org. One way or the other, we need a working website around that time. Additionally I would like to release AOO 4.1.8 and we must have a working download page for that. (Side note: At the moment I

RE: Website Migrations

> -Original Message- > From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de] > Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2020 10:49 AM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: Website Migrations > > Hello, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dave Fishe

RE: Website Migrations

Hello, > -Original Message- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:w...@apache.org] > Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2020 8:48 PM > To: dev > Subject: Website Migrations > > Hi - > > [...] We should proceed with great care, because some of xxx's website content is of great importance in answering

Re: Website Migrations

On 7/11/2020 11:48 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi - It’s time to start the process of migrating two of our websites from the deprecated Apache CMS to a new method of building. This will be a major undertaking and there are several goals. The sites are: https://openoffice.apache.org/

Re: [WEBSITE] Adding +Indexes option to .htaccess

Hi all-- The option of adding a +Indexes option to a per directory .htaccess file worked about one day for the QA test case scenario, and then it didn't. Infra has made changes to our web VMs and this should work now. I had already fixed the QA test case page with an actual index.html page when I

Re: [WEBSITE] QA area changes, and differences between staging and production

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > On 4/2/2018 7:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > ​OK, I think the filenames are fixed now. Bad commit the first time I > guess. > > Great if you could help with the restructuring. Please keep in mind that > > this

Re: [WEBSITE] QA area changes, and differences between staging and production

On 4/2/2018 7:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > ​OK, I think the filenames are fixed now. Bad commit the first time I guess. > Great if you could help with the restructuring. Please keep in mind that > this is not ALL the TestLink files. I need to see what we're missing and > want to have at this point.

Re: [WEBSITE] QA area changes, and differences between staging and production

On 4/2/2018 8:07 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > On 4/2/2018 7:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> OK, I think the filenames are fixed now. Bad commit the first time I guess. >> Great if you could help with the restructuring. Please keep in mind that >> this is not ALL the TestLink files. I need to see what

Re: [WEBSITE] QA area changes, and differences between staging and production

On 4/2/2018 7:29 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > OK, I think the filenames are fixed now. Bad commit the first time I guess. > Great if you could help with the restructuring. Please keep in mind that > this is not ALL the TestLink files. I need to see what we're missing and > want to have at this point. >

Re: [WEBSITE] QA area changes, and differences between staging and production

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:18 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > On 4/2/2018 6:41 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Keith N. McKenna < > keith.mcke...@comcast.net> > > wrote: > > > >> On 3/30/2018 3:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >>> I've committed changes

Re: [WEBSITE] QA area changes, and differences between staging and production

On 4/2/2018 6:41 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Keith N. McKenna > wrote: > >> On 3/30/2018 3:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> I've committed changes to the QA area complete with the "index" >> capability >>> of the new test case area. I'll be

Re: [WEBSITE] QA area changes, and differences between staging and production

a followup, see below... On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Keith N. McKenna < > keith.mcke...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> On 3/30/2018 3:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> > I've committed changes to the QA area complete with the

Re: [WEBSITE] QA area changes, and differences between staging and production

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > On 3/30/2018 3:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > I've committed changes to the QA area complete with the "index" > capability > > of the new test case area. I'll be working on additional changes to the > QA > > area

Re: [WEBSITE] QA area changes, and differences between staging and production

On 3/30/2018 3:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > I've committed changes to the QA area complete with the "index" capability > of the new test case area. I'll be working on additional changes to the QA > area over the next few days before a general announcement to QA. > > NOTE: the staging web site --

Re: [WEBSITE] QA area changes, and differences between staging and production

On 03/30/2018 12:21 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Kay, I took a look. Looks ok. Saw a css file at the end. I think it would be good to filter the index so that only certain mimetypes or suffixes are shown like html, pdf, ods, etc. Regards, Dave Hi Dave -- That css file is needed to make the

Re: [WEBSITE] QA area changes, and differences between staging and production

Hi Kay, I took a look. Looks ok. Saw a css file at the end. I think it would be good to filter the index so that only certain mimetypes or suffixes are shown like html, pdf, ods, etc. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 30, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:

Re: [WEBSITE] Adding +Indexes option to .htaccess

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:06 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 28.03.2018 um 20:54 schrieb Dave Fisher: > >> On Mar 28, 2018, at 11:51 AM, Marcus wrote: >>> >>> Am 28.03.2018 um 08:34 schrieb Dave Fisher: >>> I’m thinking you should make the

Re: [WEBSITE] Adding +Indexes option to .htaccess

Am 28.03.2018 um 20:54 schrieb Dave Fisher: On Mar 28, 2018, at 11:51 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 28.03.2018 um 08:34 schrieb Dave Fisher: I’m thinking you should make the change then we look on staging and revert if we don’t approve. It’s a quick test if inadvertently

Re: [WEBSITE] Adding +Indexes option to .htaccess

Am 28.03.2018 um 08:29 schrieb Dave Fisher: +1. While it would be nice format it and we probably could your approach is fine for now. I’m curious but not enough yet to scratch. OK, when you put it already into voting style then I've to say my -1 to open up the website globally. But I can

Re: [WEBSITE] Adding +Indexes option to .htaccess

Am 28.03.2018 um 19:11 schrieb Kay Schenk: If no one else chimes in, I will do this later today. This will effect areas like: http://www.openoffice.org/promotions/ which has no index.html file. Of course, there exist many subdirectories under the main website tree that have no "index.html"

Re: [WEBSITE] Adding +Indexes option to .htaccess

> On Mar 28, 2018, at 11:51 AM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 28.03.2018 um 08:34 schrieb Dave Fisher: >> I’m thinking you should make the change then we look on staging and revert >> if we don’t approve. >> It’s a quick test if inadvertently published it’s not a big deal. > > do

Re: [WEBSITE] Adding +Indexes option to .htaccess

Am 28.03.2018 um 08:34 schrieb Dave Fisher: I’m thinking you should make the change then we look on staging and revert if we don’t approve. It’s a quick test if inadvertently published it’s not a big deal. do you need the test to see how it looks like? I think we all can imagine how a

Re: [WEBSITE] Adding +Indexes option to .htaccess

Am 28.03.2018 um 03:08 schrieb Kay Schenk: On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 15:44 Marcus wrote: Am 27.03.2018 um 22:25 schrieb Kay Schenk: I would like to change our .htaccess file for www.openoffice.org to allow for diretory contents listing when no "default" index.html file is

Re: [WEBSITE] Adding +Indexes option to .htaccess

Hi Dave -- If no one else chimes in, I will do this later today. This will effect areas like: http://www.openoffice.org/promotions/ which has no index.html file. Of course, there exist many subdirectories under the main website tree that have no "index.html" file and are presumably linked in by

Re: [WEBSITE] Adding +Indexes option to .htaccess

I’m thinking you should make the change then we look on staging and revert if we don’t approve. It’s a quick test if inadvertently published it’s not a big deal. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 27, 2018, at 6:08 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 15:44 Marcus

Re: [WEBSITE] Adding +Indexes option to .htaccess

+1. While it would be nice format it and we probably could your approach is fine for now. I’m curious but not enough yet to scratch. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 27, 2018, at 1:57 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > +1 from me > > This would solve the problem on

Re: [WEBSITE] Adding +Indexes option to .htaccess

Am 27.03.2018 um 22:25 schrieb Kay Schenk: I would like to change our .htaccess file for www.openoffice.org to allow for diretory contents listing when no "default" index.html file is available. This would be changing the first line of .htaccess from this: Options +Includes +MultiViews to

Re: [WEBSITE] Adding +Indexes option to .htaccess

+1 from me This would solve the problem on this page: https://www.openoffice.org/marketing/art/galleries/logos/aoo-working/ Regards,    Matthias Am 27.03.2018 um 22:25 schrieb Kay Schenk: I would like to change our .htaccess file for www.openoffice.org to allow for diretory contents

Re: Website outage

- Mail original - > De: "FR web forum" <ooofo...@free.fr> > À: "Dave Fisher" <dave2w...@comcast.net> > Envoyé: Mardi 9 Janvier 2018 18:25:35 > Objet: Re: Website outage > > > How is www.openoffice.org/fr/? > Works! > B

Re: Website outage

FR web forum wrote: It's time for Infra to take a look. Did you follow this ask or should I do it? The preferred way to contact INFRA is by creating an issue in JIRA. I went ahead and created it this time: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/INFRA/issues/INFRA-15822 You can subscribe to

Re: Website outage

> It's time for Infra to take a look. Did you follow this ask or should I do it? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Website outage

Dave Fisher wrote: What is the full url you are using? Would you try to run a traceroute and dig on that domain? I've tested again. Same results as reported in the other discussion. Basically, one IP from the DNS record is working and the other is not (so if you incur in the non-working one,

Re: Website outage

e" <o...@mechtilde.de> >> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Envoyé: Samedi 30 Décembre 2017 15:21:42 >> Objet: Re: Website outage >> >> Hello, >> >> I had the same problem this morning. Now it is ok. >> >> Kind regards >> >&g

Re: Website outage

Seems to be outage again - Mail original - > De: "Mechtilde" <o...@mechtilde.de> > À: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Envoyé: Samedi 30 Décembre 2017 15:21:42 > Objet: Re: Website outage > > Hello, > > I had the same problem this morning. Now it

Re: Website outage

Hello, I had the same problem this morning. Now it is ok. Kind regards Mechtilde Am 30.12.2017 um 14:37 schrieb Marcus: > Am 30.12.2017 um 14:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Am 30.12.2017 um 14:25 schrieb FR web forum: >>> www.openoffice.org is not responding >> >> No problems here... >> >> But

Re: Website outage

www.openoffice.org is responding. Jürgen Am 30.12.2017 um 14:25 schrieb FR web forum: www.openoffice.org is not responding - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Website outage

OK seems to be recovered now - Mail original - > De: "FR web forum" > À: dev@openoffice.apache.org, infrastruct...@apache.org > Envoyé: Samedi 30 Décembre 2017 14:25:07 > Objet: Website outage > > www.openoffice.org is not responding

Re: Website outage

Am 30.12.2017 um 14:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 30.12.2017 um 14:25 schrieb FR web forum: www.openoffice.org is not responding No problems here... But during the last days I noticed several times, that it took much longer to open the webpage. I thought it was a problem with my ISP. also

Re: Website outage

Am 30.12.2017 um 14:25 schrieb FR web forum: > www.openoffice.org is not responding No problems here... But during the last days I noticed several times, that it took much longer to open the webpage. I thought it was a problem with my ISP. Matthias > >

Re: [Website] Format of links

Am 23.07.2017 um 11:31 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: > From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > >> For my Korean translator it is important... ;-) >> In general, all languages with characters that have >> descenders are barely readable: >> g j ç ą ę ļ -> g j ç ą ę ļ > OK, now I

Re: [Website] Format of links

From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > For my Korean translator it is important... ;-) > In general, all languages with characters that have > descenders are barely readable: > g j ç ą ę ļ -> g j ç ą ę ļ OK, now I understand that the question specifically related to the

Re: [Website] Format of links

I am sorry my phone keeps correcting... she into he... Grrr Am 23. Juli 2017 10:49:07 MESZ schrieb Peter kovacs : >Well then he'd the expert. Go for it :) > >Am 23. Juli 2017 10:45:50 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel >: >>She is a native speaker and did

Re: [Website] Format of links

Well then he'd the expert. Go for it :) Am 23. Juli 2017 10:45:50 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel : >She is a native speaker and did the translation for the Korean page >over >the last month. > >I just update the HTML... ;-) > >Matthias > > >Am 23.07.2017 um 10:42

Re: [Website] Format of links

She is a native speaker and did the translation for the Korean page over the last month. I just update the HTML... ;-) Matthias Am 23.07.2017 um 10:42 schrieb Peter kovacs: > Is he a application or a person? > > Am 23. Juli 2017 10:40:26 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel >

Re: [Website] Format of links

Is he a application or a person? Am 23. Juli 2017 10:40:26 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel : >For my Korean translator it is important... ;-) > >In general, all languages with characters that have descenders are >barely readable: > >g j ç ą ę ļ -> _g j ç ą ę ļ_ >

Re: [Website] Format of links

For my Korean translator it is important... ;-) In general, all languages with characters that have descenders are barely readable: g j ç ą ę ļ -> _g j ç ą ę ļ_ Matthias Am 23.07.2017 um 10:18 schrieb Jörg Schmidt: >> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] >> Sent:

Re: [Website] Format of links

> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de] > Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 11:30 PM > I am completing the translation of the Korean download page: > https://www.openoffice.org/ko/download/index.html > > Some of the links are underlined. This totally breaks the readability >

Re: [Website] Format of links

Maybe we should in general replace underlying with abuttonlike approach? Like a slight different colour from the rest of the box where the link is placed. But I am no got at UI design. The Korean government side does not have any link underlining. So that looks like it it not needed if the

Re: [WEBSITE] Where to link in OpenOffice FAQ?

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 12/08/2015 Marcus wrote: Am 08/11/2015 10:39 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/11/2015 12:21 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: Many of those FAQ's were merged into the FAQ pages on the mwiki. I had thought I had notified

Re: [WEBSITE] Where to link in OpenOffice FAQ?

Am 08/21/2015 06:10 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Andrea Pescettipesce...@apache.org wrote: On 12/08/2015 Marcus wrote: Am 08/11/2015 10:39 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/11/2015 12:21 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: Many of those FAQ's were merged into the FAQ

Re: [WEBSITE] Where to link in OpenOffice FAQ?

On 12/08/2015 Marcus wrote: Am 08/11/2015 10:39 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/11/2015 12:21 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: Many of those FAQ's were merged into the FAQ pages on the mwiki. I had thought I had notified the dev list and requested those pages be redirected to the mwiki, but it is

Re: [WEBSITE] Where to link in OpenOffice FAQ?

Am 08/11/2015 10:39 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/11/2015 12:21 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: Marcus wrote: Am 08/09/2015 07:09 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: Having looked around a bit, I could not easily find where the general FAQ is linked. It seems

Re: [WEBSITE] Where to link in OpenOffice FAQ?

Am 08/09/2015 07:09 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: Having looked around a bit, I could not easily find where the general FAQ is linked. It seems to be a link from the about page -- http://www.openoffice.org/about/ which is also no longer linked from the home page. Should we link About from

Re: [WEBSITE] Where to link in OpenOffice FAQ?

On 08/11/2015 09:30 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/09/2015 07:09 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: Having looked around a bit, I could not easily find where the general FAQ is linked. It seems to be a link from the about page -- http://www.openoffice.org/about/ which is also no longer linked from the home

Re: [WEBSITE] Where to link in OpenOffice FAQ?

Marcus wrote: Am 08/09/2015 07:09 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: Having looked around a bit, I could not easily find where the general FAQ is linked. It seems to be a link from the about page -- http://www.openoffice.org/about/ which is also no longer linked from the home page. Should we link

Re: [WEBSITE] Where to link in OpenOffice FAQ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/11/2015 12:21 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: Marcus wrote: Am 08/09/2015 07:09 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: Having looked around a bit, I could not easily find where the general FAQ is linked. It seems to be a link from the about page --

Re: website security certificate

Dňa nedeľa, 22. február 2015 22:10 ,Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org napísal: Marcus wrote: now the main and download webpage will be loaded via HTTPS only. Thanks Marcus, I confirm that https://www.openoffice.org now doesn't give either the HTTP components warning or the identity

Re: website security certificate

Am 02/23/2015 11:10 AM, schrieb Michal Hri: Dňa nedeľa, 22. február 2015 22:10 ,Andrea Pescettipesce...@apache.org napísal: Marcus wrote: now the main and download webpage will be loaded via HTTPS only. Thanks Marcus, I confirm that https://www.openoffice.org now doesn't give either the

Re: website security certificate

Marcus wrote: now the main and download webpage will be loaded via HTTPS only. Thanks Marcus, I confirm that https://www.openoffice.org now doesn't give either the HTTP components warning or the identity information warning any longer. So everything works for me with HTTPS. Of course,

Re: website security certificate

Am 02/20/2015 08:30 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 02/20/2015 08:07 PM, schrieb Marcus: I've started with the download webpage as I know it very well. I don't see any errors as it looks like before. But I'll leave it for the moment and go on earliest on Sunday. now the main and download webpage will

Re: website security certificate

On 20 February 2015 at 00:34, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: Hi - We had a reason that we enabled https in the first place. I don't recall it now, but there was a reason. It may have had to do with update servers. The main web server on which we run, have always been enabled for

Re: website security certificate

I've started with the download webpage as I know it very well. I don't see any errors as it looks like before. But I'll leave it for the moment and go on earliest on Sunday. Marcus Am 02/19/2015 11:49 PM, schrieb Marcus: Am 02/19/2015 11:14 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 19/02/2015

Re: website security certificate

Am 02/20/2015 08:07 PM, schrieb Marcus: I've started with the download webpage as I know it very well. I don't see any errors as it looks like before. But I'll leave it for the moment and go on earliest on Sunday. grrr, some change was too much. So, I've reverted the changes for now and will

Re: website security certificate

Am 02/19/2015 08:08 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Marcus wrote: Am 02/19/2015 02:36 PM, schrieb jan i: On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phippssi...@webmink.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan ij...@apache.org wrote: On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton

Re: website security certificate

Marcus wrote: Am 02/19/2015 08:08 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Marcus wrote: Am 02/19/2015 02:36 PM, schrieb jan i: On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phippssi...@webmink.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan ij...@apache.org wrote: On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E.

Re: website security certificate

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 07:10:56PM +0100, Marcus wrote: I've changed all links for the grey box from HTTP to HTTPS. Let's see if this will help to solve the problem. The correct solution is to use src=/path/to/image, not forcing the protocol on the url. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La

Re: website security certificate

Am 02/19/2015 09:09 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Marcus wrote: Am 02/19/2015 08:08 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Marcus wrote: Am 02/19/2015 02:36 PM, schrieb jan i: On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phippssi...@webmink.comwrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan ij...@apache.org

Re: website security certificate

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: The connection to this web site is not fully secure because it contains unencrypted elements (such as images). Perhaps

Re: website security certificate

On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: The connection to this web site is not fully secure

Re: website security certificate

Am 02/19/2015 02:36 PM, schrieb jan i: On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phippssi...@webmink.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan ij...@apache.org wrote: On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: The connection to this web

Re: website security certificate

Marcus wrote: Am 02/19/2015 02:36 PM, schrieb jan i: On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phippssi...@webmink.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan ij...@apache.org wrote: On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: The connection

Re: website security certificate

On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote: OK, next try. Still an error message? Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL https://www.openoffice.org ; as a courtesy to those people who prefer HTTPS, we make it available, but if they use broken extensions or paranoid security settings

Re: website security certificate

On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote: OK, next try. Still an error message? Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL https://www.openoffice.org ; as a courtesy to those people who prefer HTTPS, we make it

Re: website security certificate

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:33 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote: OK, next try. Still an error message? Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL

Re: website security certificate

Andrea Pescetti wrote on 19/02/15 23:14: On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote: OK, next try. Still an error message? Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL https://www.openoffice.org ; as a courtesy to those people who prefer HTTPS, we make it available, but if they use broken

Re: website security certificate

Am 02/19/2015 11:14 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote: OK, next try. Still an error message? Well... we NOWHERE, and I repeat NOWHERE, advertise the URL https://www.openoffice.org ; as a courtesy to those people who prefer HTTPS, we make it available, but if they use

Re: website security certificate

I tried it on 2 different computers and both got the error. Brenda From: jan i Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 1:26 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org ; dennis.hamil...@acm.org Cc: blissfulh...@live.com Subject: Re: website security certificate On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E

Re: website security certificate

jan i wrote: On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: The connection to this web site is not fully secure

Re: website security certificate

On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Keith N. McKenna keith.mcke...@comcast.net wrote: jan i wrote: On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com javascript:; wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i j...@apache.org javascript:; wrote: On Thursday, February 19, 2015,

Re: website security certificate

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:01 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Keith N. McKenna keith.mcke...@comcast.net wrote: jan i wrote: On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com javascript:; wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i

Re: website security certificate

Hi - We had a reason that we enabled https in the first place. I don't recall it now, but there was a reason. It may have had to do with update servers. Regards, Dave On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 02/19/2015 11:14 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote: OK,

  1   2   3   >