A model of 100% volunteer based software project is futile.
Only a combination of payed workers and volunteers is viable.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> On 11.01.2017 11:00, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
>
>> Am 11.01.2017 um 09:44 schrieb Patricia
Maybe market based is the wrong expression. How about market oriented...?
# We are more innovative!
# Have more features!
# We have faster release cycles!
# We are no 1 open Source Office suite.
They are not community focused arguments, not open source focused arguments.
All the Best
Peter
Dr.
Dave Fisher schrieb am Sa., 14. Jan. 2017, 04:56:
> Hi -
>
> If Oracle or IBM thought they had any additional advantage with Apache
> OpenOffice development then the history of this project would differ.
>
Obviously however you do not know what their reasons for the
Am 14.01.2017 um 00:55 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>
> You see that on the LO vs. OO discussion. Most of the LO argument are
> market based one. If you think outside the market its all not an issue.
> What Reamains is the strength of Open source as such.
> In my eyes we are in a super strong position,
Hi -
If Oracle or IBM thought they had any additional advantage with Apache
OpenOffice development then the history of this project would differ.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 13, 2017, at 3:55 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 12.01.2017 11:00, Pedro
On 12.01.2017 11:00, Pedro wrote:
Hi Peter
If your model works directly with the Product, the flexibility of the
Permissive license can be the stronger choice.
I do not believe that a lot of people understand this.
Can you elaborate on this point? I don't really see how using a
I will answer later today, I hope. Sorry for the delay.
Pedro schrieb am Do., 12. Jan. 2017, 11:01:
> Hi Peter
>
> > If your model works directly with the Product, the flexibility of the
> > Permissive license can be the stronger choice.
> > I do not believe that a
Hi Peter
If your model works directly with the Product, the flexibility of the
Permissive license can be the stronger choice.
I do not believe that a lot of people understand this.
Can you elaborate on this point? I don't really see how using a
copyleftless license is better when your
Am 11.01.2017 um 22:49 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> Thanks michael for your explanations. Was really interesting, even if I
> have another point of view :-D
>
IMO there are a lot of points of view possible, when you are talking
about copyleft. And most of these are valid, if you don't say, that one