Re: Status of ASF Ubuntu Buildbots

Gavin McDonald wrote: What we do have is two (imho) useless ‘snapshot’ builds (based on openoffice/tags/SNAPSHOT - Which hasn’t had a commit in 10 months and never will have because its a ‘tag’. ...which would be true if we were using SVN the textbook way, but for historical reasons we

Re: Status of ASF Ubuntu Buildbots

Hello Gavin +1 Am 13.09.2016 um 03:38 schrieb Gavin McDonald: > >> On 12 Sep 2016, at 8:25 AM, Marcus wrote: >> >> Am 09/10/2016 03:51 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>> Gavin McDonald wrote: I’ve been working on creating replacement VMs for the deprecated Tethys >>>

Re: Status of ASF Ubuntu Buildbots

> On 12 Sep 2016, at 8:25 AM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 09/10/2016 03:51 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >> Gavin McDonald wrote: >>> I’ve been working on creating replacement VMs for the deprecated Tethys >> >> Thanks a lot. This is really much appreciated. > > yes, thanks so

Re: Status of ASF Ubuntu Buildbots

Am 09/10/2016 03:51 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Gavin McDonald wrote: I’ve been working on creating replacement VMs for the deprecated Tethys Thanks a lot. This is really much appreciated. yes, thanks so much for helping us with the buildbots. I reduced the frequency of some builds - I

Re: Status of ASF Ubuntu Buildbots

Hello +1 in general I think one build per week or two weeks is enough. It should be possible to start it manually if there are some bigger commits.. The person who commit code to the main branch should be able to start the buildbots. Kind regards Mechtilde Am 10.09.2016 um 02:24 schrieb

Status of ASF Ubuntu Buildbots

Hi All, I’ve been working on creating replacement VMs for the deprecated Tethys (10.04 64bit) , bb-vm2 (12.04 32bit) and bb-vm3 (12.04 32bit). This work is now complete. 3 VMs replaced with 2 x 14.04 LTS VMs. (As an aside there is a 16.04 LTS buildbot available if you want to do tests on it) 3