Re: MacOS testing for bug 112829 (SVG clipboard format)

gt; Either trunk or AOO42X. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 7:11 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>>> Which branch? >>>> >>>>> On Feb 22, 2024, at 10:54 AM, Damjan Jovanovic >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>&

Re: MacOS testing for bug 112829 (SVG clipboard format)

>>> On Feb 22, 2024, at 10:54 AM, Damjan Jovanovic > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> For bug 112829, I got graphics and charts to copy out of AOO in SVG > >> format > >>> on FreeBSD and Windows

Re: MacOS testing for bug 112829 (SVG clipboard format)

Damjan Jovanovic >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> For bug 112829, I got graphics and charts to copy out of AOO in SVG >> format >>> on FreeBSD and Windows (and probably Linux), but I wasn't able to test >>> macOS. A quick look at the co

Re: MacOS testing for bug 112829 (SVG clipboard format)

Either trunk or AOO42X. On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 7:11 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > Which branch? > > > On Feb 22, 2024, at 10:54 AM, Damjan Jovanovic > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > For bug 112829, I got graphics and charts to copy out of AOO in SVG > forma

Re: MacOS testing for bug 112829 (SVG clipboard format)

Which branch? > On Feb 22, 2024, at 10:54 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Hi > > For bug 112829, I got graphics and charts to copy out of AOO in SVG format > on FreeBSD and Windows (and probably Linux), but I wasn't able to test > macOS. A quick look at the code shows

MacOS testing for bug 112829 (SVG clipboard format)

Hi For bug 112829, I got graphics and charts to copy out of AOO in SVG format on FreeBSD and Windows (and probably Linux), but I wasn't able to test macOS. A quick look at the code shows we might need another patch to get it working there, possibly the one below. Can someone please test

Re: [PR] Address bug #126680 [openoffice]

ardovm merged PR #171: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/171 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #171: Address bug #126680

Pilot-Pirx commented on PR #171: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/171#issuecomment-1677591807 Any news here? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment.

Re: A Short History on the Term "Bug"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Hopper#/media/File:First_Computer_Bug,_1945.jpg On 30/06/2023 23:05, Keith N. McKenna wrote: I came across this bit of trivia on a news group I follow: PS --- don't you love the term "bug". Where I used to work, they had the late Grace Mur

Re: A Short History on the Term "Bug"

On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 06:50:05 -0700 Dave Fisher wrote: > When I was a child I asked my father “why?”and he told me that the bug was a > cockroach flipping a bit in core memory - which was a grid of wires where > each bit was a little magnetic donut. Ah! core memory, where each me

Re: A Short History on the Term "Bug"

When I was a child I asked my father “why?”and he told me that the bug was a cockroach flipping a bit in core memory - which was a grid of wires where each bit was a little magnetic donut. Thanks! Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 30, 2023, at 6:36 AM, Keith N. McKenna > wrote: >

A Short History on the Term "Bug"

I came across this bit of trivia on a news group I follow: PS --- don't you love the term "bug". Where I used to work, they had the late Grace Murray Hopper in to give us a talk every few years. One of her anecdotes of the early days was how the term came about. One time a "d

[GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #171: Address bug #126680

Pilot-Pirx commented on PR #171: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/171#issuecomment-1447352781 Please test! This could be a good addition to our next release. I an building for Windows now. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on pull request #171: Address bug #126680

leginee commented on PR #171: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/171#issuecomment-1435941891 I do not agree that caching makes sense. If behavior is switched the data needs to be adjusted too. IMHO it is better to work with less dynamic Objects. instead instantiate a new

[GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm opened a new pull request, #171: Address bug #126680

ardovm opened a new pull request, #171: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/171 The purpose of this branch is to fix bug #126680. All information is on the bug report: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126680 Instances of com.sun.star.i18n.Transliteration.l10n

Re: Fwd: Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute.

use? Do you have Java 32bit installed? All the best Peter Am 28.12.22 um 14:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi all, FYI Can anyone confirm/test? Regards,    Matthias Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff: Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute. Datum: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11

Re: Fwd: Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute.

? Regards,    Matthias Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff:Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute. Datum: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:50:18 +0100 Von:Mauro (GMail) Antwort an: us...@openoffice.apache.org An: us...@openoffice.apache.org Good morning, I'd like

Re: Fwd: Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute.

:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi all, FYI Can anyone confirm/test? Regards,    Matthias Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff:Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute. Datum: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:50:18 +0100 Von:Mauro (GMail) Antwort an: us...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Fwd: Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute.

? I can test Windows in the next days. I have 2 Monitors. I just was not at home the past days. yes, the original reporter is working on Windows 10. Marcus Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff: Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute. Datum: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:50:18 +0100

Re: Fwd: Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute.

have 2 Monitors. I just was not at home the past days. Marcus Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff: Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute. Datum: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:50:18 +0100 Von: Mauro (GMail) Antwort an: us...@openoffice.apache.org An: us

Re: Fwd: Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute.

Am 28.12.22 um 14:30 schrieb Matthias Seidel: FYI Can anyone confirm/test? maybe a Linux-only issue. On my Linux system with 2 monitors no dialog boxes or document windows will disappear. Marcus Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff:Bug in Calc - Search

Fwd: Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute.

Hi all, FYI Can anyone confirm/test? Regards,    Matthias Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff:Bug in Calc - Search and Substitute. Datum: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 11:50:18 +0100 Von:Mauro (GMail) Antwort an: us...@openoffice.apache.org An: us

[GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-956639520 https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

leginee commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-956629246 As soon as I find a build ;) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

leginee commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-956629246 As soon as I find a build ;) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

[GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-956639520 https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and

[GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-956639520 https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win/ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

leginee commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-956629246 As soon as I find a build ;) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

[GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-955607076 When? ;-) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

leginee commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-945085618 Sure. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

[GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-945085404 With the code now in trunk, do we want to start testing it? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee edited a comment on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

leginee edited a comment on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-945085021 Sorry, I forgot about it. I wanted to run the code once. I note in my review the state I have. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

leginee commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-945085021 Sorry, I forgot about it. I wanted to run the code once. The code change itself looked fine, from code review perspective. -- This is an automated message from the

[GitHub] [openoffice] jimjag merged pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

jimjag merged pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[GitHub] [openoffice] dave2wave commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

dave2wave commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-931604791 @leginee @ardovm requested your review. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL

[GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

ardovm commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-925836356 > Is this PR ready? Or, have the changes already been merged in a different PR? Thank you for checking this! I am still waiting for a review. I would like to have

[GitHub] [openoffice] dave2wave commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

dave2wave commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-925827397 Is this PR ready? Or, have the changes already been merged in a different PR? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

UI bug for Calc only under MacOS

Hello, French users confirm this bug: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=114001 Occurs with 4.2.0-dev too. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

leginee commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-792224362 starting with code review. I like that you have added comments. This is an automated message from the

[GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

ardovm commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-774489872 Ok, I am done. Reviews welcome! This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

e documents attached to the reports do not seem to trigger the bug any more. The PR is IMHO production-ready, but I would like to spend some more time on documentation. This is an automated message from the Apache Git

[GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm edited a comment on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

ardovm edited a comment on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-774024441 > Is > `if (!!bAutoStyles)` > really the best way to format that logical if for

[GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

ardovm commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-774024441 > Is > `if (!!bAutoStyles)` > really the best way to format that logical if for

[GitHub] [openoffice] jimjag commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

jimjag commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-773990932 Is ` if (!!bAutoStyles) ` really the best way to format that logical if for

[GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm opened a new pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

ardovm opened a new pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122 This is a work-in-progress fix for https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128356 Please keep the discussion about the "philosophy" of the patch on Bugzilla. Code style, variable names,

Re: Keep issues@ in bug reports [Was: Request for Bugzilla karma]

Am 30.01.21 um 12:17 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus wrote: Am 26.01.21 um 22:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Maybe you can find something in the Bugzilla configuration that defines the default QA contact? ... Sorry, not in BZ itself. I've looked into the admin settings but cannot find a suitable

Re: Keep issues@ in bug reports [Was: Request for Bugzilla karma]

Marcus wrote: Am 26.01.21 um 22:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Maybe you can find something in the Bugzilla configuration that defines the default QA contact? ... Sorry, not in BZ itself. I've looked into the admin settings but cannot find a suitable option. I believe our old (and I don't know

Re: Keep issues@ in bug reports [Was: Request for Bugzilla karma]

Am 26.01.21 um 22:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus wrote: IMHO we just ned to make sure that isues@ is either the assignee - this works as long as nobody is taking over the issue for working on it - or it's in the CC list. Then every update on the issue will be posted to issues@. Even

Re: Keep issues@ in bug reports [Was: Request for Bugzilla karma]

in the CC list. Then every update on the issue will be posted to issues@. I understand. > I'm quite sure I've done it already, but I've enabled you for the following > BZ groups in BZ: > > canconfirm: Can confirm a bug or mark it a duplicate > editbugs: Can edit all bug fi

Re: Keep issues@ in bug reports [Was: Request for Bugzilla karma]

Marcus wrote: IMHO we just ned to make sure that isues@ is either the assignee - this works as long as nobody is taking over the issue for working on it - or it's in the CC list. Then every update on the issue will be posted to issues@. Even though I can't really find it in older issues like

Re: Keep issues@ in bug reports [Was: Request for Bugzilla karma]

t's in the CC list. Then every update on the issue will be posted to issues@. I'm quite sure I've done it already, but I've enabled you for the following BZ groups in BZ: canconfirm: Can confirm a bug or mark it a duplicate editbugs: Can edit all bug

[GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #118: Tentative solution of bug #125129

Pilot-Pirx merged pull request #118: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/118 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

[GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #118: Tentative solution of bug #125129

Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #118: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/118#issuecomment-767530852 If there are no objections I will merge this code later this day. This is an automated message from the

Keep issues@ in bug reports [Was: Request for Bugzilla karma]

Hello, FWIW... On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 09:10:51PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote: [...] > If I recall correctly, we relied on a "trick" that would set the "QA > contact" field for any new issues to the issues mailing list. Even if the > assignee is changed, the "QA contact" is not reset and this

[GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm opened a new pull request #118: Tentative solution of bug #125129

ardovm opened a new pull request #118: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/118 See [https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125129] This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

Re: AOO 4.1.9 Info - bug 127952

This seems like a safe and non-controversial fix to me... > On Jan 7, 2021, at 4:31 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 07:03:19AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote: > >> On 6 Jan, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 6, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Arrigo Marchiori

Re: AOO 4.1.9 Info - bug 127952

Hello, On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 07:03:19AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote: > On 6 Jan, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > > >> On Jan 6, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Arrigo Marchiori > >> wrote: > >> > >> Hello All, > >> > >> > >> - My own build of trunk on Linux can open the file. > >> > >> Do you think that

Re: AOO 4.1.9 Info - bug 127952

On 6 Jan, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > >> On Jan 6, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: >> >> Hello All, >> >> >> - My own build of trunk on Linux can open the file. >> >> Do you think that this is worth more investigation before releasing >> 4.1.9? >> > > AFAICT, it is not a

Re: AOO 4.1.9 Info - bug 127952

> On Jan 6, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Hello All, > > > - My own build of trunk on Linux can open the file. > > Do you think that this is worth more investigation before releasing > 4.1.9? > AFAICT, it is not a regression (trunk and 4.1.x are very different)... So I

Re: AOO 4.1.9 Info - bug 127952

g.cgi?id=128413> > >>> This was handled by making fakeroot required: > >>> > >>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/4975252caf49bc46c383c6cef330cb927a635806 > >> > >> OK, but did anyone confirm it with the test build

Re: BUG ?

/ - Mail original - > De: "gilbert.sidobre" > À: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Envoyé: Vendredi 27 Novembre 2020 16:58:56 > Objet: BUG ? > > ‌Bonjour, > Je viens de télécharger votre version en français v 4.1.8. > J'avais auparavant installé une versi

BUG ?

‌Bonjour, Je viens de télécharger votre version en français v 4.1.8. J'avais auparavant installé une version à moitié en espagnol. Lors de l'installation de la 4.1.8 français j'obtiens un message"cette version est déjà installée". J'ai fait une desinstallation avec iobit uninstaller.Recherche

Possible error in File https://www.openoffice.org/sc/excelfileformat.pdf (was: How to go about confirming a possible bug and contributing updates to a document )

pages. :) I wanted to ask about a possible bug or submitting a patch to this document. I think I may have found an error in the size table in section 3.4.7. Specifically, tFunc and tFuncVar on page 43. The BIFF8 size is listed at 4 and 5 respectively. However, in section 3.7.1 and 3.7.2 only 3

Fw: Regarding Bug in Writer pasting star shaped graphs

@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Fw: Regarding Bug in Calc when formatting graphs When pasting sine graph into writer then the graph is incorrect as "Star Object Descriptor (XML)" but looks great as an GDI METAFILE object, perhaps should be default? Cheers and happy ladies day. A2 - Sin Waves Untitl

Fw: Regarding Bug in Calc when formatting graphs

When pasting sine graph into writer then the graph is incorrect as "Star Object Descriptor (XML)" but looks great as an GDI METAFILE object, perhaps should be default? Cheers and happy ladies day. A2 - Sin Waves Untitled 7 2.ods Description: A2 - Sin Waves Untitled 7 2.ods

Regarding Bug in Calc when formatting graphs

Trying to complete graphs of sine waves. Due to the changing of the x scale, when formatting the x axis, wavelength scale is set to 1 second. This occurs whenever entering the graph format dialogue, where the "Major Interval" is set to one, graph then shows no useful visual information. See

Re: Bug in Open Office Writer

Am 09.08.19 um 21:56 schrieb ralfhelle...@mail.ru: in writer I can input a pdf such as picture. Thats works good. Also I can print it. Ists o.k.but if i make an exchange with pdf the inludet pdf picrure disappeared. I use Version: 6.1.2.1 (x64) you are wrong here. As you are using another

Bug in Open Office Writer

Hello, in writer I can input a pdf such as picture. Thats works good. Also I can print it. Ists o.k.but if i make an exchange with pdf the inludet pdf picrure disappeared. I use Version: 6.1.2.1 (x64) Best wishes Ralf Hellener

bug report..?

I was unable to search for a bug I reported on theforums after attempts made to yourtwitter accountand to your forums, the issue revolving around documentation and the types of export files that LibreOffice Math allows since as you are aware a lot of other office packages offering different

4.1.6_release_blocker granted: [Issue 127874] fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API

Peter has granted Don Lewis 's request for 4.1.6_release_blocker: Issue 127874: fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127874 --- Comment #1 from Peter --- Accepted for 4.1.6

4.1.6_release_blocker requested: [Issue 127874] fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API

Don Lewis has asked for 4.1.6_release_blocker: Issue 127874: fix bad potential invalid subscript bug when using Microsoft Uniscribe text layout API https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127874 --- Description --- This trunk commit should be merged to AOO416 to fix the potential use

Re: Bug on macOS X and Microsoft Word 2003 XML format

rosoft Word 2003 XML (.xml)" >> Both files saved and reopened. >> >> Larry >> >> On 2018-02-13, 4:56 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote concerning "Bug on macOS X and >> Microsoft Word 2003 XML format": >>> A bug has been reported on the Ita

Re: Bug on macOS X and Microsoft Word 2003 XML format

quot;Microsoft Word 2003 XML (.xml)" > Both files saved and reopened. > > Larry > > On 2018-02-13, 4:56 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote concerning "Bug on macOS X and > Microsoft Word 2003 XML format": >> A bug has been reported on the Italian mailing list but I'd

Re: Bug on macOS X and Microsoft Word 2003 XML format

Tested using OpenOffice 4.1.5 & macOS 10.13.3 High Sierra Saved an existing .odt & a .doc file as "Microsoft Word 2003 XML (.xml)" Both files saved and reopened. Larry On 2018-02-13, 4:56 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote concerning "Bug on macOS X and Microsoft Word 2003 XML

Bug on macOS X and Microsoft Word 2003 XML format

A bug has been reported on the Italian mailing list but I'd like to get verification by a Mac user. To reproduce: 1. Be on High Sierra (but it would be useful to check with other versions too; the reporter says everything worked correctly, with OpenOffice 4.1.5, before upgrading to High

Re: Issues accessing apache services from campus network after mining of bug reports

Thank you, I will try writing to them. On 02/02/2018 02:50 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Juan Florez wrote: I'm writing to report a problem that surfaced after trying to download a relatively big number of bug reports from this project's bugzilla. In short, any domain at apache.org started

Re: bug openoffice calc

It's possible there might be some connection with that bug, but opening Thierry's file in a hex editor indicates that it does have some xls content. I would recommend Thierry post a bug report https://bz.apache.org/ooo/ and attach a copy of the file to that report. Google translate transcription

Re: bug openoffice calc

May this be affiliated with our Bug? Google translate transcription into english: Hello to my regret I will uninstall Open Office 4.1.5: for the 2nd time the .xls files updated with openoffice are saved ... without the data. only the empty sheet remains in the file example attached

bug openoffice calc

Bonjour à mon grand regret je vais désinstaller Open Office 4.1.5 : pour la 2eme fois les fchiers .xls mis à jour avec openoffice sont enregistrés... sans les données. il ne reste dans le fichier qu'une feuille vide, exemple ci-joint. C'est un bug bloquant -- Très cordialement Thierry COLSON

Re: Issues accessing apache services from campus network after mining of bug reports

Juan Florez wrote: I'm writing to report a problem that surfaced after trying to download a relatively big number of bug reports from this project's bugzilla. In short, any domain at apache.org started rejecting connections You have likely been blacklisted. You need to contact ASF Infra. See

Issues accessing apache services from campus network after mining of bug reports

Hello, my name is Juan Florez and I am a PhD student at the University of Texas at Dallas. I'm writing to report a problem that surfaced after trying to download a relatively big number of bug reports from this project's bugzilla. In short, any domain at apache.org started rejecting

4.1.5_release_blocker granted: [Issue 127580] Fix for Issue 127568 created a new bug in Base

Jim Jagielski <j...@apache.org> has granted Keith N. McKenna <k...@apache.org>'s request for 4.1.5_release_blocker: Issue 127580: Fix for Issue 127568 created a new bug in Base https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127580 --- Comment #13 from Jim Jagielski <j...@apache.org>

4.1.5_release_blocker requested: [Issue 127580] Fix for Issue 127568 created a new bug in Base

Keith N. McKenna <k...@apache.org> has asked for 4.1.5_release_blocker: Issue 127580: Fix for Issue 127568 created a new bug in Base https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127580 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un

Re: another bug in base

evel change for framework/source/loadenv/loadenv.cxx. > > I cannot reproduce it with the as-released 4.1.4 on Windows. > > Does anyone have a debug set-up that does reproduce it? If so, I can > write

Re: another bug in base

4.1.4 on Windows. Does anyone have a debug set-up that does reproduce it? If so, I can write instructions for testing whether it is related to the null pointer bug. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com

Re: another bug in base

On 26 Nov, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > > On 11/26/2017 4:47 PM, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 27 Nov, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>> I can't reproduce it here, on trunk with: >>> FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512 >>> Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.3 >>> with

Re: another bug in base

Do we need/want a FreeBSD build VM? I could try to set one up... > On Nov 26, 2017, at 6:47 PM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: > > I'm seeing another bug in base on all versions of FreeBSD. To > reproduce: > 1. Open an existing database > 2. Select Table i

Re: another bug in base

On 11/26/2017 4:47 PM, Don Lewis wrote: On 27 Nov, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: I can't reproduce it here, on trunk with: FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512 Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.3 with either our built-in HSQLDB driver or SQlite over ODBC. What

Re: another bug in base

On 27 Nov, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > I can't reproduce it here, on trunk with: > FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512 > Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.3 > with either our built-in HSQLDB driver or SQlite over ODBC. > > What version of AOO are you using? What

Re: another bug in base

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Don Lewis <truck...@apache.org> wrote: > I'm seeing another bug in base on all versions of FreeBSD. To > reproduce: > 1. Open an existing database > 2. Select Table in the far left pane > 3. Select a table in the lower left pane &

another bug in base

I'm seeing another bug in base on all versions of FreeBSD. To reproduce: 1. Open an existing database 2. Select Table in the far left pane 3. Select a table in the lower left pane 4. Select Document in the lower right pane At that point, my mouse cursor shows that something is busy. I am

Fwd: bug with moving image

Hello! For several years I using OOffice. But I forced to old version OOffice, because in new version is bug with mooving images. So, when I move image at page by mouse and then double click on it, If in next dialog, I click OK, the image move at page randomly It you can see in video https

Re: Possible Formula Bug in Calc? (IsError and Find)

Here is an example spreadsheet showing off the bug. After experimenting a bit today I can conclude there doesn't seem to be a single function that can capture the error from Find() when used in an array like this. Using the function wizard and moving the cursor through the formula on the lower

RE: Possible Formula Bug in Calc? (IsError and Find)

ible Formula Bug in Calc? (IsError and Find) I have an array formula that is returning an error of #VALUE when it shouldn't.The formula is below. {=ISERROR(INDEX($'Sales 4-10-2017'.$A$1:$A$1000;SMALL(IF(ISERROR(FIND("Discount";$'Sales 4-10-2017'.$A$1:$A$1000))=0;ROW($'Sales 4-10-2017'

Re: Possible Formula Bug in Calc? (IsError and Find)

e. But on the actual spreadsheet you get that #VALUE error. Oh, I just tried switching out Find for Search and the same thing occurs. So maybe it's a bug in iserror as it's the only constant? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@o

Possible Formula Bug in Calc? (IsError and Find)

through the formula in the function wizard it gets the expected results of true or false. But on the actual spreadsheet you get that #VALUE error. Oh, I just tried switching out Find for Search and the same thing occurs. So maybe it's a bug in iserror as it's the only constant?

Re: [Issue 117338] Concurrency bug in environment handling

Am 10/25/2016 03:46 AM, schrieb bugzi...@apache.org: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117338 Keith N. McKenna changed: What|Removed |Added

RE: Bug#837178: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: All memory and swap is used up until system freezes

> -Original Message- > From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:b...@decadent.org.uk] > Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 18:11 > To: Jose R R <jose@metztli-it.com>; 837...@bugs.debian.org; Wolfgang > Tichy <wtich...@gmail.com> > Cc: dev <dev@openoffice.apac

Re: Bug#837178: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: All memory and swap is used up until system freezes

On Sat, 2016-09-10 at 17:37 -0700, Jose R R wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Wolfgang Tichy > wrote: > > > > Package: src:linux > > Version: 3.16.7-ckt25-2+deb8u3 > > Severity: critical > > Tags: security > > Justification: causes serious data loss > > > > Dear

Re: Bug#837178: linux-image-3.16.0-4-amd64: All memory and swap is used up until system freezes

On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2016-09-10 at 17:37 -0700, Jose R R wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Wolfgang Tichy >> wrote: >> > >> > Package: src:linux >> > Version: 3.16.7-ckt25-2+deb8u3 >> > Severity:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >