Hi Ariel,
I noticed a couple of commits that you made over the weekend. Only one
of these mentioned a bug id (121542, [1]). Some of the changes
introduce incompatible API changes, some but not all of which are
mentioned in the issue comments.
Can you give us a short overview of what you
There is a some strange behaviour in OpenOffice Calc (and in Microsoft Office
too). Did it was made in OpenOIffice for compability with MSO?
This seems to concern all combinations of even degrees and minus sign in the
begining of formula
1. Enter in cell the expression: =-1^2
The result will
Hi,
On 24.05.2013 10:21, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 23.05.2013 09:19, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
[snip]
I have seen that #621 of aoo-win7 also had this error and that you had
again cleaned up the hanging processes.
In order to get some error output I will switch off the HTML
Hi,
On 27.05.2013 12:00, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
[snip]
I have seen that #621 of aoo-win7 also had this error and that you
had
again cleaned up the hanging processes.
In order to get some error output I will switch off the HTML output
(no
--html option) and the multiprocessor build
On 2013/05/27 11:20 AM, Torokhov Sergey wrote:
There is a some strange behaviour in OpenOffice Calc (and in Microsoft Office
too). Did it was made in OpenOIffice for compability with MSO?
This seems to concern all combinations of even degrees and minus sign in the
begining of formula
1.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Torokhov Sergey torokhov-...@yandex.ru wrote:
There is a some strange behaviour in OpenOffice Calc (and in Microsoft
Office too). Did it was made in OpenOIffice for compability with MSO?
Hi,
On 27.05.2013 11:20, Torokhov Sergey wrote:
There is a some strange behaviour in OpenOffice Calc (and in
Microsoft Office too). Did it was made in OpenOIffice for compability
with MSO?
This seems to concern all combinations of even degrees and minus
sign in the begining of formula
1.
Hi All,
We continue doing the AOO 4.0 Full Regression test this week, here is the
weekly update (5/18 - 5/27), please find more detail statistics in wiki:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Report/WeeklyReport/20130527
*Test execution: *
We have assigned 1565 text executions to about 16
On 27.05.2013 13:33, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Torokhov Sergey torokhov-...@yandex.ru wrote:
There is a some strange behaviour in OpenOffice Calc (and in Microsoft Office
too). Did it was made in OpenOIffice for compability with MSO?
Andre Fischer wrote:
In any case, this is a problem with no good solution.
Indeed. Before this becomes another 0 ^ 0... there is an issue for this,
it dates back to 2004 and it is marked invalid. That's it.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=24271
If someone has strong feelings
Hi,
please see the (long) discussions in
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=24271 and
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=26755 and its duplicates.
Torokhov Sergey schrieb:
There is a some strange behaviour in OpenOffice Calc (and in
Microsoft Office too). Did it was
On Mon, 27 May 2013 14:08:15 +0200
Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Andre Fischer wrote:
In any case, this is a problem with no good solution.
Indeed. Before this becomes another 0 ^ 0... there is an issue for this,
it dates back to 2004 and it is marked invalid. That's it.
... iPanel? ...iBar? ...iSidebar? ...iTools?
On 24.05.2013 08:49, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Rist [mailto:andrew.r...@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 8:34 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Find a better name for sidebar?
SmartPanel ?
Thanks to all for explanations
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
On 27.05.2013 14:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Andre Fischer wrote:
In any case, this is a problem with no good solution.
Indeed. Before this becomes another 0 ^ 0... there is an issue for
this, it dates back to 2004 and it is marked invalid. That's it.
27.05.2013, 16:16, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de:
My personal favorite is the way Gnumeric does it. It puts brackets
around -1 when you enter the formula, so that there is no doubt about
the meaning.
Kind regards
Regina
It looks currently like best solution without
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:27:00AM +0200, Andre Fischer wrote:
Hi Ariel,
I noticed a couple of commits that you made over the weekend. Only
one of these mentioned a bug id (121542, [1]). Some of the changes
introduce incompatible API changes, some but not all of which are
mentioned in the
On 27.05.2013 15:16, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:27:00AM +0200, Andre Fischer wrote:
Hi Ariel,
I noticed a couple of commits that you made over the weekend. Only
one of these mentioned a bug id (121542, [1]). Some of the changes
introduce incompatible API changes,
why i, I'd say oPanel or aPanel
+1
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Armin Le Grand armin.le.gr...@me.comwrote:
... iPanel? ...iBar? ...iSidebar? ...iTools?
On 24.05.2013 08:49, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Rist [mailto:andrew.r...@oracle.com**]
Sent:
We'll sidebar doesn't in anyway indicate it can't be edited. Many people
use blogging systems, and sidebars are editable.
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.dewrote:
Hi,
Shari Smith schrieb:
How about User Box or User Panel? UP Box (User Panel Box; UP the
Hi
2013/5/27 Shari Smith shari.sm...@uneedstuff.com:
why i, I'd say oPanel or aPanel
+1
Effectively panel is interesting in our local context, so
[a|I|o]Panel is a good way.
More yet if in the furure the formating toolbar will be disabled.
Better(IMHO) if we improve this *panel* with
Hi,
I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
these problems.
We are behind our schedule a little bit and we have identified some
problems regarding the 64bit port on MacOS that I will try to explain
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 04:49:01PM +0200, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 27.05.2013 15:16, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:27:00AM +0200, Andre Fischer wrote:
Hi Ariel,
I noticed a couple of commits that you made over the weekend. Only
one of these mentioned a bug id
On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
these problems.
We are behind our schedule a little bit and we have identified
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 06:58:54PM +0200, janI wrote:
On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
these problems.
We
Without concern for rationale, it is part of the ODF 1.2 OpenFormula syntax
that unary minus has precedence over all binary operators.
It is not uncommon for there to be such a rule in programming languages (C/C++,
Java, and JavaScript, for example).
Some languages that have an
Hello Everyone,
Thank you for placing confidence in my skills.
I'll make sure that I'll put my 100% effort in bonding with the community
and completing my project.
I'll definitely utilize this opportunity very well.
THANK YOU.
--
Rajath S,
M.Sc(Hons.) Physics,
Birla Institute of Technology and
Hi Rajath,
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:39:29AM +0530, Rajath Shashidhara wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Thank you for placing confidence in my skills.
I'll make sure that I'll put my 100% effort in bonding with the community
and completing my project.
I'll definitely utilize this opportunity very
Am Montag, 27. Mai 2013 um 18:58 schrieb janI:
On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
these problems.
We
Am Montag, 27. Mai 2013 um 19:47 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 06:58:54PM +0200, janI wrote:
On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
problems I see. And
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
these problems.
We are behind our schedule a little bit and we have
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:58 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
these problems.
We
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Without concern for rationale, it is part of the ODF 1.2 OpenFormula syntax
that unary minus has precedence over all binary operators.
It is not uncommon for there to be such a rule in programming languages
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:04:57PM +0200, RGB ES wrote:
2013/5/26 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 09:27:56PM +0200, RGB ES wrote:
Recently, an user on the EN forum raised a
What we've done so far:
1) Called for logo submissions from the community
2) Many designers responded and we received 40 submissions. There was
a lot of cross-fertilization of ideas, as designers saw what others
had come up with, what worked, and borrowed ideas.
3) We did a survey of user
2013/5/28 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:04:57PM +0200, RGB ES wrote:
2013/5/26 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 09:27:56PM +0200, RGB ES wrote:
Yes, NOT A BUG is definitely preferable to INVALID.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 02:56 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Dennis Hamilton
Subject: Re: Question about: OpenOffice Calc. =-1^2 like expressions
[ ... ]
[This was cross-posted, so I'm not clear what list was intended. Makes
tracking the discussion difficult.]
I'll bite:
I prefer Chris's latest. The weight of the lettering is more powerful. I think
the Apache should not be so thin. The form used by Samer works better. I
also think
On May 27, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 12:58 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 27 May 2013 17:17, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
problems I see. And I would like to
On May 27, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
[This was cross-posted, so I'm not clear what list was intended. Makes
tracking the discussion difficult.]
I'll bite:
I prefer Chris's latest. The weight of the lettering is more powerful. I
think the Apache should not be so
Hi -
I just now reviewed Jürgen's latest snapshot build and I have some trademark
concerns. The current UI and Help file seem to be out of Apache Branding
policy[1][2] in two ways.
(1) The most prominent use of the brand in many place is OpenOffice when it
ought to be Apache OpenOffice. This
On May 27, 2013, at 8:28 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi -
I just now reviewed Jürgen's latest snapshot build and I have some trademark
concerns. The current UI and Help file seem to be out of Apache Branding
policy[1][2] in two ways.
(1) The most prominent use of the
Am Montag, 27. Mai 2013 um 23:38 schrieb Rob Weir:
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I would like to discuss our further schedule towards AOO 4.0 and the
problems I see. And I would like to discuss a proposal how to address
these
43 matches
Mail list logo
