Stupid question where is the script?
Am 21. Oktober 2018 23:58:25 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel
:
>Am 21.10.18 um 23:55 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 21.10.2018 um 23:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 21.10.18 um 22:43 schrieb Peter kovacs:
When the year issue has been fixed, I think we can
Am 21.10.18 um 23:55 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 21.10.2018 um 23:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 21.10.18 um 22:43 schrieb Peter kovacs:
>>>
>>> When the year issue has been fixed, I think we can call it an RC1. I
>>> check tomorrow evening. Sorry had no energy for stuff on the weekend.
>>
>> How do
Am 21.10.2018 um 22:43 schrieb Peter kovacs:
When the year issue has been fixed, I think we can call it an RC1. I check
tomorrow evening. Sorry had no energy for stuff on the weekend.
just to prevent misunderstandings:
My suggestion was a general improvement and not limited to this release.
Am 21.10.2018 um 23:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 21.10.18 um 22:43 schrieb Peter kovacs:
When the year issue has been fixed, I think we can call it an RC1. I check
tomorrow evening. Sorry had no energy for stuff on the weekend.
How do we want to sign the builds?
"For new releases, PMCs
Hi Peter,
Am 21.10.18 um 22:43 schrieb Peter kovacs:
> Hi all.
>
> When the year issue has been fixed, I think we can call it an RC1. I check
> tomorrow evening. Sorry had no energy for stuff on the weekend.
How do we want to sign the builds?
"For new releases, PMCs MUST supply SHA-256 and/or
Hi all.
When the year issue has been fixed, I think we can call it an RC1. I check
tomorrow evening. Sorry had no energy for stuff on the weekend.
All the best
Peter
Am 21. Oktober 2018 20:19:53 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel
:
>Am 21.10.18 um 20:08 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 21.10.2018 um 20:06
Am 21.10.18 um 20:08 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 21.10.2018 um 20:06 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>> Am 21.10.18 um 19:59 schrieb Marcus:
>>> Am 20.10.2018 um 20:02 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
That's what it looks like, yeah.
>>>
>>> copyright years are always forgotten to update. Every year the same.
>>>
Am 21.10.2018 um 20:06 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Am 21.10.18 um 19:59 schrieb Marcus:
Am 20.10.2018 um 20:02 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
That's what it looks like, yeah.
copyright years are always forgotten to update. Every year the same. ;-)
In fact I *did* update it for trunk in January... ;-)
Am 21.10.18 um 19:59 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 20.10.2018 um 20:02 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> That's what it looks like, yeah.
>
> copyright years are always forgotten to update. Every year the same. ;-)
In fact I *did* update it for trunk in January... ;-)
But my test build are always with
Am 20.10.2018 um 20:02 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
That's what it looks like, yeah.
copyright years are always forgotten to update. Every year the same. ;-)
We now have a script to update version numbers; somewhere in the
devtools I think.
What about to create a new script to list all the code
Dear Gavin,
It was great and worked fine. What time zone do you use?
Glad,
Sandro Suzart
De: Gavin McDonald
Enviado: domingo, 21 de outubro de 2018 04:37
Para: OOo Apache
Assunto: Re: Chat Channel (was [Discussion] Program for Sandro)
Hi Sandro,
I sent an
All uploaded!
> On Oct 20, 2018, at 4:18 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Which langs would people like? I'll upload to my Apache people space.
>
> Italian please. And thanks to both you and Matthias for providing the builds.
>
> The Release Candidate will have to be
Hi Sandro,
I sent an invite email so that you can join the #openoffice channel, let me
know how it goes.
Gav...
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:42 PM sandro wrote:
> Dear Gavin,
>
> I have followed your instruction. The Slack Site (https://asf.slack.com/)
> says that I need an account to access
13 matches
Mail list logo
