On 10/6/2016 5:29 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/05/2016 12:23 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Could people working on the bugzilla entries check the status and update
as appropriate?
I've seen now all issues as "Resolved - Fixed" - or "Verified - Fixed".
Note that I did
This thread has morphed a bit, and I think a summary may be useful at
this time.
It started with Keith pointing out, correctly, that I was taking a short
cut by starting the vote before all the relevant bugs had been marked
"Fixed", although after I was sure they were all fixed in reality.
I downloaded and installed
Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe. To my distress, when
I first started it, it accepted "color" (US spelling) and rejected
"colour" (English spelling).
I thought perhaps it picked up my previous use of en-US from my profile,
but I got the same
On 10/4/2016 1:15 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/04/2016 09:44 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I downloaded and installed
Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.3_Win_x86_install_en-GB.exe. To my distress, when
I first started it, it accepted "color" (US spelling) and rejected
"colour" (English s
On 10/4/2016 4:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Oct 3, 2016, at 3:49 PM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote:
On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement
for a r
denied it 4.1.3 release blocker, but added a request for 4.1.4.
On 10/4/2016 2:47 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/04/2016 10:31 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
ah, thanks. I've updated some text (e.g., separated the sec
at
dist.apache.org.
Apache OpenOffice is a project with a wide user base, who only use the
binaries. So it is important to release well defined and tested binaries.
Otherwise support becomes hell.
Kind regards
Am 04.10.2016 um 01:58 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 10/3/2016 3:30 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/03
With about three hours to go on the vote, I've prepared a spreadsheet
based on the [VOTE] thread.
The current situation is 10 votes, one [0], nine [+1]. Of the +1 votes,
five are binding. The comments indicate a range of different approaches
to testing, which is good.
Please check the
I would not have granted a release blocker request for this one, because
it was already fixed in source in the previous release, 4.1.2-patch1.
All 4.1.3 does for it is include it in a binary distribution, worth
indicating in the release notes, but not a reason to revive the bug.
On 10/7/2016
On 10/7/2016 3:55 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/07/2016 12:43 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
...
Thanks. Would you like to be the point person working with Sally on the
press release? It would be smooth to coordinate themes between press
release and blog post.
I don't see a problem to create
On 10/7/2016 4:06 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/07/2016 01:03 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I would not have granted a release blocker request for this one, because
it was already fixed in source in the previous release, 4.1.2-patch1.
All 4.1.3 does for it is include it in a binary distribution
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 08:10:40PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Ariel;
In all the builds that I have been involved in with AOO we have
included
a link to a Bugzilla query for all bugs fixed by that release.My
concern
was 2 fold. One that it would give a wrong impr
On 10/6/2016 5:42 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/05/2016 06:27 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
RM: Update
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3 to show
vote result etc.
The only important thing to update is that the release is available,
since
I have done some basic testing for the following environments and
language versions:
Windows 7 en_GB
Windows 8.1 en_GB, fr
Windows 10 en_GB
Ubuntu 16.04 en_GB
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For
Please post only objections to calling a vote on 4.1.3 tomorrow. I will
treat silence as consent.
As far as I can tell, we are ready to go.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional
:11 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 04.10.2016 um 00:30 schrieb Marcus:
Am 10/03/2016 11:26 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marcus wrote:
wow, *all signed source code packages* ?
I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2,
The Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 source and binaries,
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/, contain
several bug fixes. See the draft release notes at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
Please vote on releasing it as 4.1.3 by
On 10/5/2016 2:07 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
The Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 source and binaries,
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/, contain
several bug fixes. See the draft release notes at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
I had to make a change in the key preferences to meet the release
signing requirements. I uploaded to a couple of servers, including MIT,
and waited a few days.
I didn't think we were supposed to update KEYS directly?
On 10/8/2016 6:08 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
This is not a blocker for the
On 10/9/2016 5:13 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:37:38PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Can we open the AOO414 branch? Everything seems to show that 4.1.3 will be
coming in a week or so and for sure there is no further code work to do on
it. So I'd like to have an
On 9/19/2016 9:20 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
...
Given this is already late you should probably reconsider bringing in
some fixes to known bugs. If the idea is just that 4.1.3 = 4.1.2 +
CVE-2016-15-13, then it seems to be a huge waste of bandwidth for both
mirrors and end users.
All just IMHO,
Recently, we have only been adding changes for 4.1.3 if they are
necessary to building it. If you request 4.1.3 release blocker for a
general bug fix, please discuss the reasons for putting the particular
change in.
Forwarded Message
Subject: [Issue 125147] CRASH applying
I missed a couple of configure parameter changes I need.
On 9/21/2016 10:03 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I believe I have done all the preliminary steps. configure appeared to
work, but I have a persistent bootstrap failure:
...
all external libraries present
downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
I believe I have done all the preliminary steps. configure appeared to
work, but I have a persistent bootstrap failure:
...
all external libraries present
downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
downloading to C:/OpenOfficeDev/AOO413/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part
download from
How would granting 4.1.3_release_blocker on this impact progress on the
builds?
Forwarded Message
Subject: 4.1.3_release_blocker requested: [Issue 127127] English
dictionary included in 4.1.3 installer is outdated
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 18:37:17 +
From:
1. My current policy for release blocker is to grant it immediately if
it seems obvious to me that a fix is needed to build 4.1.3. I will also
do so based on prior security@ discussion. Otherwise, I'll ask for input
on dev@ before deciding.
2. I would like to get a list of environments in
On 9/18/2016 12:14 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 09/18/2016 07:45 AM, schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Hmm, does anyone know an artist that has some time and can draw a splash
screen?
I would love to see the next edition Called 4.1.3 Phoenix addition, And
I would love to see a Splashscreen that shows an Phönix
Do you happen to know the bugzilla issue for that? It needs 4.1.3
release blocker status.
On 9/18/2016 10:02 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
This was fixed in trunk, but commit r1729921 still needs to be ported
to the 4.1.3 branch.
Damjan
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Oliver Brinzing
files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2" --with-epm-url="http://www.
msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz" --disable-pch
--disable-atl --disable-activex --without-junit
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:39 PM, John D'Orazio <john.dorazio@
cappellaniauniroma3.org> wrote:
So I've take
On 9/18/2016 1:21 PM, Marcus wrote:
I've created a list of all issues for the 4.1.3 release:
Show all issues that include the flag "4.1.3_release_blocker" [1].
The list includes granted issues for 4.1.3 but also ones that are still
open (4.1.3_release_blocker?) and not included
There are two types of issue. There is a very small set of issues that
motivated 4.1.3. In addition, we are paying off technological debt due
to not have routinely done point releases, mainly copying fixes for
build issues from the trunk into the 4.1.3 branch.
On 9/18/2016 1:21 PM, Marcus wrote:
This is a binding vote.
On 9/15/2016 4:21 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
+1
On 9/15/2016 8:35 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
[BCC to PMC]
RESOLUTION: That Marcus Lange (marcus) be recommended to the
Apache Software Foundation Board to serve as Vice President
for Apache OpenOffice
rface if installing them from the cygwin
interface. I think installing the packages from the cygwin interface should
be indicated as the first step to take when first installing cygwin, adding
all the necessary packages along with the first install.
The only package I couldn't find from the cygwin i
the cygwin interface was the Perl
LWP::UserAgent package, so I installed that using "cpan -i LWP::UserAgent".
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote:
Congratulations! I'm about to do a Windows 10 build on a new machine, so
please make sure the ste
in the trunk for 1 1/2 year?
But I am only a user and leave those decisions to the developers... ;-)
Am 19.09.2016 um 15:10 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Recently, we have only been adding changes for 4.1.3 if they are
necessary to building it. If you request 4.1.3 release blocker for a
general bug
I had installed 64-bit Cygwin installed here before I started on
compiling AOO. I hit problems, and had to go to the recommended 32-bit
Cygwin.
However, things have changed a bit since then, so it may be worth seeing
if it works.
On 9/19/2016 8:59 AM, John D'Orazio wrote:
...
I also read
On 9/20/2016 2:37 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 18/09/2016 Marcus wrote:
Am 09/17/2016 01:00 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Are there any tools to help put together an AOO release? If so, where
are they?
We don't have any. But I've provided a script that I've just used for a
test 4.1.3 build
On 9/20/2016 12:56 AM, John D'Orazio wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile <arie...@apache.org>
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 07:12:29PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
4.1.3 does have changes to the language library URLs. Has anyone else
done a
build that in
Are there any tools to help put together an AOO release? If so, where
are they?
In particular, the binaries for each language for e.g. Windows will
result from a build in a Windows environment. The release candidate
groups the binaries by language, a transposition of the build matrix.
Each
changing the install path of NSIS to one without spaces, packaging also
completed successfully. I have added "Windows 10" alongside "Windows 7" and
"Windows 8.1" in the Step by Step guide.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote:
I h
of this is too advanced for me. I want to help
but. I just still got lost trying to understand the emails everyone
was sending.
Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote:
Courtney,
I tried to reply directly to your email three days ago. Please
check whether a message from me got
On 8/23/2016 12:14 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
...
2. Update Java requirement from Java 1.5 to *at least* Java 1.7
I am rather adamant that we change our building requirement to Java 1.7
for all platforms. I will be changing that in our Building Guide today.
Java 1.5 went out of support
THANK YOU!
I need to get my confluence problems sorted out, but it is much better
not to let that delay getting the text into the Wiki.
On 9/27/2016 6:24 AM, Dick Groskamp wrote:
Added Patricia's draft text to the template for Release notes 4.1.3.
I am currently thinking about testing, and test result collection, for
4.1.3.
Is there an OpenOffice QA person in the house?
If so, I would like to let you take charge of organizing testing, and
just provide some suggestions.
Opinions on this release blocker request?
Forwarded Message
Subject: 4.1.3_release_blocker requested: [Issue 127140] Installer
includes VC package than 4.1.2
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:57:14 +
From: bugzi...@apache.org
Reply-To: iss...@openoffice.apache.org
To:
On 9/27/2016 5:01 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
I look at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3
+Release+Notes,
and don't see any option to edit, other than the Firefox edit menu.
Technically, the icon is not in Confluence
any on the web site or even in the mail...
Or should we wait for the RC (there used to be links on the website for
the RCs).
Hagar
Le 26/09/2016 à 22:51, Marcus a écrit :
Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus:
Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I suggest that people start
On 9/27/2016 3:37 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 24/09/2016 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
https://github.com/apache/openoffice
It seems this repo isn't up-to-date, strange... I would have guessed
this was synchronized
I've reported this to INFRA months ago:
On 9/27/2016 5:20 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 9:51 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Editing the release notes wiki
Is the username "p...@apache.org" or just &q
On 9/27/2016 8:26 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 9/27/2016 5:01 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org]
I look at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.3
+Release+Notes,
and don't see any option to edit, other
Welcome. I used to go to Beaverton quite often when I was working for
FPS and its successors.
We are currently testing a 4.1.3 release candidate. You can download
many different binaries from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/binaries/
On 9/27/2016 5:04 PM, R. Mark Aldrich
/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus:
Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
until we have a complete release candidate.
thanks for the pointer, I'll wait
On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement
for a release.
A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs to
have built the software from source and tested
Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement
for a release.
A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs to
have built the software from source and tested it on a machine under the
PMC member's control. See
On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marcus wrote:
wow, *all signed source code packages* ?
I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2,
the .gz and the .zip. They are equivalent. This sentence is for when a
project makes a release composed of different
On 10/3/2016 3:30 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/03/2016 11:26 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marcus wrote:
wow, *all signed source code packages* ?
I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2,
the .gz and the .zip
On 9/30/2016 9:59 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
there is no need to reinvent the wheel, I guess ;)
Indeed. I've bumped the bug report just to give visibility to the
scripts we already had.
you need to fix the ant build script first, see the bug report
Fixing
On 9/30/2016 10:15 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release
manager to decide on them.
If nobody steps in, and/or nobody has any objection
Here's an answer to part of your question.
On 10/2/2016 9:49 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
...
What does SAL NO VTABLE mean? Is it macro code?
...
It's time to start using the OpenOffice OpenGrok at
http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/
(Or use find and grep in combination, but that takes
Can this get to e.g. the Wiki? It is excellent advice for users deciding
whether to use AOO.
On 10/2/2016 9:17 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
+1
Rory's point is all that matters. The user wants to know how things
will work *now* in choosing between different products.
Hypotheticals and
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/binaries/
On 9/25/2016 10:29 PM, Mechtilde wrote:
Hello
Do we have a test build for MacOSX 64 bit?
Then I will check it
Mechtilde
Am 25.09.2016 um 23:30 schrieb Marcus:
Am 09/25/2016 11:05 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
What
On 9/24/2016 7:55 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 07:37:41PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
It looks as though these commits are going under 4.1.2, not 4.1.3. Is that
deliberate?
Yes ;) See my other mail, I want to test svn mv with my spare-dirs
checkout. If it works
It looks as though these commits are going under 4.1.2, not 4.1.3. Is
that deliberate?
On 9/24/2016 7:25 PM, arie...@apache.org wrote:
Author: arielch
Date: Sun Sep 25 02:25:41 2016
New Revision: 15519
Log:
Prepare 4.1.3 release
Added:
dev/openoffice/4.1.2/
On 9/26/2016 2:01 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 26.09.2016 um 05:58 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
[Comments, suggestions, improvements welcome.]
Only some nitpicking... ;-)
Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 is a maintenance release incorporating
security fixes, updated dictionaries, and build fixes
I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
until we have a complete release candidate.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
We do need to get control of templates.openoffice.org, either direct
control or a SourceForge contact to whom we can pass this sort of request.
On 9/25/2016 7:51 AM, Formsbirds wrote:
Dear Webmaster,
I'm writing to ask for adding "Nofollow" tag to the links that pointed to my
site -
On 9/25/2016 9:04 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote:
We do need to get control of templates.openoffice.org, either direct
control or a SourceForge contact to whom we can pass this sort of request.
More than that, the site
On 9/26/2016 8:01 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I had foolishly assumed that editing the Wiki would be reasonably easy.
It isn't.
I need to add a child page to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Releases, and don't
see an "Add Page" link.
Pa
On 9/26/2016 8:26 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 9/26/2016 8:01 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I had foolishly assumed that editing the Wiki would be reasonably easy.
It isn't.
I need to add a child page to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence
On 9/26/2016 8:37 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 9/26/2016 8:26 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 9/26/2016 8:01 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I had foolishly assumed that editing the Wiki would be reasonably
easy
> On Sep 30, 2016, at 07:00, Ariel Constenla-Haile <arie...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 06:28:01AM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>> I just saw the bug report https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126605,
>> "Make sure the source p
On 10/1/2016 9:24 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
The idea is to start from a clean check-out, not configured, move the
LICENSE, NOTICE, and README files, and delete what is not needed. "what
is not needed" should be a relatively short list, including the
There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release
manager to decide on them.
I am reluctant to be release manager for 4.1.4, because I will have
limited Internet access, and no access to my home computers, from
December 15th to January 8th. I will be packing immediately
On 10/1/2016 2:55 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Is this a good time to rename
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/? It should
change to "4.1.3-rc1" before final testing and vote.
Since I really want to do this when the most involved people are not
very active,
Is this a good time to rename
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/? It should
change to "4.1.3-rc1" before final testing and vote.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For
Done.
On 10/1/2016 2:55 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
Is this a good time to rename
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3/? It should
change to "4.1.3-rc1" before final testing and vote.
-
To unsu
The Apache OpenOffice project is currently preparing and testing a
release candidate, 4.1.3-rc1. The total size of the artifacts, including
the binary files, exceeds a gigabyte, so the release policy calls for
notifying Infrastructure.
I do not expect significant Infrastructure impact because
According to http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#heads-up,
infra needs to be notified in advance of releases of more than 1GB.
What is the total size of our binaries?
Do our releases really count for this, because most downloading will be
from SourceForge, not ASF mirrors.
On 10/5/2016 8:26 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I plan to start the 4.1.3 vote today. This is a draft of the action list
assuming the vote passes. Please help by correcting, expanding, and
adding anything missing.
Just in case anyone missed it, the vote passed so it is time to execute
the post
On 10/9/2016 8:56 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
On 9 Oct, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 10/9/2016 10:52 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marcus wrote:
- Change the RC1 into the real release
This one takes a few seconds and is best done close to the release.
- Uploading to the Sourceforge mirrors
On 10/9/2016 10:52 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Marcus wrote:
- Change the RC1 into the real release
This one takes a few seconds and is best done close to the release.
- Uploading to the Sourceforge mirrors
This one takes a few hours. I've already prepared a full svn export of
It's an artifact of editing the release notes page - I wanted to be able
to compare two slightly different approaches. At this point, the
"Alternative" should have been deleted, but I have not yet found out how
to do it, or maybe don't have the Confluence karma to do so.
It will be fixed
I trying to read some AOO source code. There are few comments, and
several of the ones I have found are in German, which I don't know. I
have tried running some through Google Translate, but the results do not
make much sense.
Is there a translation tool that works better on source code
try to translate it
Regards
Mechtilde
Am 08.11.2016 um 19:35 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
I trying to read some AOO source code. There are few comments, and
several of the ones I have found are in German, which I don't know. I
have tried running some through Google Translate, but the results do
not
they are reading.
On 11/9/2016 5:17 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
That sounds like a good idea!
At the times, when StarOffice was a German product no one imagined, that
the code would be open-sourced... ;-)
Am 09.11.2016 um 14:01 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
As a compromise between doing individual
Thanks, Marcus. I just updated and reread doc.cxx, the file I'm trying
to understand today. Several of the German comments contained useful
information that I had not been able to guess from automatic translation.
I think we have a good process now.
On 11/10/2016 6:14 AM, bugzi...@apache.org
First, congratulations to everyone on releasing 4.1.3. If this were a
conventional, co-located project I'd like to take you all out for a
drink after work.
Now back to work :-)
At this moment, I hope everyone remembers exactly what they did, what
karma and tools they used, to make the
On 10/15/2016 1:43 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/14/2016 12:11 AM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
Marcus wrote:
Am 10/13/2016 09:34 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release
You just need to add some text. Don't care about formatting or
On 10/18/2016 11:41 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
On FreeBSD, and (according to 1 bug reporter) MacOS X, throwing an
exception from a method which isn't specified by that method's exception
specifier, eg. "throw Exception();" when the specifier was
"throw(RuntimeException)", ends up calling
If this was a known issue before 4.1.3, please list it under the prior
bug report, not 127176. 127176 was created after 4.1.3 was released, and
describes the problem as a regression relative to 4.1.2.
On 10/25/2016 9:23 AM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
On 10/21/2016 5:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised...
Most new people are joining dev@ which makes recruitment@ look
like a dismal failure.
With 20/20 hindsight, it does not seem to have been useful. The question
was whether dev@'s high
lps any?
John R. D'Orazio
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote:
I tried to build AOO413 on Windows 10, and got a failure:
/MAP /OPT:NOREF -safeseh -nxcompat -dynamicbase -NODEFAULTLIB -RELEASE
-DEBUG -INCREMENTAL:NO /SUBSYSTEM:CONSOLE /BASE:0x1b00
-
On 11/26/2016 4:22 AM, Brian Barker wrote:
...
As I explained, the user quite properly derived the hash value of the
installation file. He then - understandably but wrongly - performed the
same process to derive the hash value *of* the hash file - instead of
inspecting the value provided in that
Thanks.
On 11/18/2016 11:25 AM, mar...@apache.org wrote:
Author: marcus
Date: Fri Nov 18 19:25:19 2016
New Revision: 1770427
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1770427=rev
Log:
Translated comments from German to English
Modified:
openoffice/trunk/main/sfx2/source/appl/linkmgr2.cxx
On 10/11/2016 9:23 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I need to delete a page, and do not have the karma to do it.
I either need an addition to my confluence permissions, or for someone
who can do so to delete
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Alternative+AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
I need to delete a page, and do not have the karma to do it.
I either need an addition to my confluence permissions, or for someone
who can do so to delete
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Alternative+AOO+4.1.3+Release+Notes
On 10/12/2016 11:55 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello Apache, Hello OpenOffice-PMC, Hello Community,
I am absolutely horrified that in a situation where we have to overcome
problems together, no reasonable planning takes place.
I have started a Wiki page on "How to Cook a Release",
On 10/12/2016 2:55 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10/12/2016 11:49 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
First, congratulations to everyone on releasing 4.1.3. If this were a
conventional, co-located project I'd like to take you all out for a
drink after work.
Now back to work :-)
At this moment, I hope
On 12/6/2016 1:55 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Hi all
I'm going to the configure script and I recognize that there are still
parts for solaris. As far as I know, the last version who build with
solaris was the AOO 3.4.x. My question is, if we should ride off the
Solaris stuff or we should keep
On 12/5/2016 12:35 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
...
# Concerning 12h period. (did not find who brought this up :) )
What I mean is that it would be great if we could devide all activities
in good estimate able chunks. Agile methology claims everything that an
experienced developer estimates beyond
301 - 400 of 630 matches
Mail list logo
