Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

Hi all First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers! I have installed scenario 2 (- Upgrade install 4.1.0 over an existing 4.0.1)

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

an existing 4.0.0? Thanks! On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC

! On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Pedro Lino pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all First of all I would like to say that I'm *really* happy that update patches have arrived for the Windows OS. I was almost sure that I would never see this in a StarOffice derivative. Kudos to the AOO developers

Re: Installation guide are asked to review and update when fix bug 124599

Sounds perfect. Adding options (instead of assuming and deciding for the user) is always positive ;) Please make sure that the fix in situation 2) is also included in the MSP On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Bug 124599 [2] is verified fixed in

Re: [RELEASE]: AOO 4.1.1 milestone 3, based on rev. 1612804

Hi Juergen, all Already installed and ran (and confirmed/tested previous bugs) It is working perfectly (at least the en_US version) I'm a little worried that the Windows Nightly based on the same build failed http://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7/builds/99 Is this bad news or it is not a

Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.1 RC1 based on revision 1614049

Hi Juergen In case no one has noticed, Nightly builds for the Windows OS have been failing since July 22nd... http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/#win Based on your previous answer I assume this is a Tinderbox problem only but it would be worth to check/fix it? Best regards, Pedro On Mon,

[CWiki] Account Whitelisting

pedlino Pedro

Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Marcus wrote: > Am 03/21/2016 10:36 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > >> [top posting] >> >> Thanks for all the help with this and for the new NONE for >> target release. Hopefully, it will be used sparingly >> assuming we us e RESOLVED-FIXED as

Re: Updated dictionaries (Portuguese/English)

Hi Matthias (it could only be more perfect if the build number was included in the filename, for test builds only ;) ) It was just a simple rename via SFTP... ;-) Yes, I realize that for this build you simply did a rename (the build date didn't change). But my request was for the build

Re: Updated dictionaries (Portuguese/English)

Hi Matthias, all (it could only be more perfect if the build number was included in the filename, for test builds only ;) ) Good idea! Done... ;-) Excellent! I meant for future builds, but why not start right now? Thank you! This project is from users for users... Yes, I think that is

Re: Updated dictionaries (Portuguese/English)

Hi Matthias First of all thank you for setting up a proper download page (with Revision number and file time/date and size!). All this information is extremely useful for people systematically downloading test builds! (it could only be more perfect if the build number was included in the

Re: Test builds for Windows

Hi Mathias Thank you for the test builds. The Portuguese 1793492 build does not include the latest dictionary (available since May 29th) Can you fix this? Note: The coming build will include shell extensions for Windows 64bit (--enable-win-x64-shellext) What is the advantage? Regards,

Re: Test builds for Windows

Hi again Mathias The Portuguese 1793492 build does not include the latest dictionary (available since May 29th) Can you fix this? Confirmed! It is in trunk, but not (yet) in the 414 branch. This will be corrected! Thanks! I am quoting (from configure.ac): --enable-win-x64-shellext

Re: Updated dictionaries (Portuguese/English)

Hi Mattias, all Meanwhile the Portuguese and the English dictionaries were updated. I committed to trunk. But for the 4.1.4 branch should we reopen https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127341 ? Since there were no changes in the extension code I believe that the latest version of the

Re: i have tested

Hi all The issue can be tested with any version of Windows irregardless of bitness of the OS. The issue is with the version of msvcr100.dll. The 64bit version of the dll was inadvertently bundled with the 4.1.3 release thereby not allowing AOO version 4.1.3 to recognize a valid 32 bit JRE. To

Re: i have tested

Hi Matthias I uploaded a new test version on Sunday:The build environment was switched to Windows 10 (64bit) and I did a "full" build of all languages including language packs.Maybe you want to try this version additionally? The Java problem is confirmed fixed in the new build tested under

Re: I want to test AOO 4.1.4 again

Hi again Is there any noticeable change from the user perspective? Should testers replace the previous build with this one? No, it is the same revision. But users shouldn't use it! ;-) Ok. I am a user (meaning I'm not a developer) so my concern is the user perspective. Testers are free

Any 4.1.4 RC for Windows available for testing?

Hi all Has it been agreed to do a feature freeze on branch 4.1.4? If so are there any Release Candidate Windows binaries available? The last one I tested (and worked pretty stable) was build 1781705 from February 6th... https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/win41x/ Can someone

Re: Reported OLE issue w/ RC2

Hi Jim, all On 19/09/2017 11:49, Jim Jagielski wrote: There have been reports of some OLE issues w/ RC2. If you have been affected my it, could you try out the below: http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/pre-RC3/ I'd like to push a RC3 out asap. Can you point to the issue / bug

Re: Notice... building RC3

On 21/09/2017 21:58, Matthias Seidel wrote: +1 RC3 has never "seen the light" and RC4 would confuse people... +1 We were testing pre-RC3. But please bump the Rev number for RC3 - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Notice... building RC3

Hi Kay > On September 21, 2017 at 9:25 PM Kay Schenk wrote: > > On 09/21/2017 12:01 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > I'll be away next week, attending and presenting at both SDxE > > and the InnerSource Commons Summit, and will be away from the > > build machines.

Re: Reported OLE issue w/ RC2

Under Windows 7 x64 the equation does display correctly but there is no way to save the document without crashing. AOO crashes when inserting the equation in Writer but also when opening a Math/Formula file and simply by typing an equation in Math. See detailed instructions in

Re: 4.1.4 RC4: synchronize labels don't work on MacOS

> I have reproduced the problem in my Windows 8.1 debug environment, based > on trunk but with some 4.1.4 changes added. I need to get some more > sleep before serious debug (it is 2:08 a.m. here). Could someone check > whether it happens in the unmodified trunk? That would narrow it

Re: 4.1.4 show stopper!

Hi Andrea, all > Remember that the amount of code changes needed to produce something > named 4.1.5 is quite significant and very much error-prone. Take a look > at the relevant issues in case, but for a "quick fix" I would definitely > stick to 4.1.4, produce 4.1.4-RC5 and vote on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

+1 (non-binding) Installed AOO414m5(Build:9788)  -  Rev. 1811857 2017-10-11 20:12 Portuguese (pt-PT) full install + en_US language pack Tested and approved under Windows 7 x64 and Windows 10 x64 Tests performed Test  > Result Verify md5 signature  >  Passed Install AOO414-RC5 > Success

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice 4 Wiki

Dear Bahram Maskanian > First, I like to thank you for developing and offering such a great > suite of programs to the public free of charge. I am using MAC OS > Sierra, and as a Persian American I have been using it for my Farsi > communication, however after version 4.0.1 every

Re: Reporting a problem with the OpenOffice 4 Wiki

Hi Peter, all I guess he is not on the list. Is it wise to send him to BZ where we might reject just because we can not reproduce the issue? Actually i have been able to replicate and describe problems related to Farsi in LO's bugtracker and some were eventually fixed. As a triager I have

Re: Keep calm and don't over-react Was: Re: 4.1.4 show stopper!

Hi all > On October 10, 2017 at 8:47 PM Jörg Schmidt wrote: > imho: > Better to spend more time on a qualitatively good release than to release a > less good release overhasty. +1 > Please don't forget: the quality of AOO is the main argument for many users > to

Re: Resolution re: 4.1.4 and 4.1.5

> On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > After a night's sleep I decided that we should release > the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing > one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense. +1 > So the plan is to "re-open"

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC4 as GA

+1 (non-binding) Installed AOO414m4(Build 9787) - Rev. 1809226 - 2017-09-21 23:35 Portuguese (pt-PT) full install + en_US language pack Tested and approved under Windows 7 x64 and Windows 10 x64 Thanks to all! On 30/09/2017 20:54, Jim Jagielski wrote: I am calling a VOTE on releasing Apache

Re: AAO writer RC-2

I can't figure out why this issue wasn't simply added to Bugzilla and the file attached to the bug... Or reported on the QA mailing list? AOO RC2 under Windows 7 x64 does not crash with the sample document following the steps described by Greg. Maybe this is a Ubuntu only problem? Regards,

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

Maybe we need to ask for review of http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval at the same time as looking at the voting process documentation. If taken literally, a PMC member who cannot do builds from source can't cast a +1 vote, because their vote is binding and a

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

On 18/10/2017 19:02, Andrea Pescetti wrote: This is OK as long as the Apache Policy doesn't get in the way too much... I mean, I highly appreciate when people provide a list of what they did to justify their +1. But this shouldn't be used "against" them. +1 (as a user) ASF does a hell of a

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

Hi Dave, all (1) PMC members have a higher bar for their vote. I did not vote at all because I did not build from source etc. I agree that it is good that some users replicate the building procedure and confirm that it works. Replicability is a good measure of transparency and quality. In

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

So the practice is much saner than the theory and nobody discarded Larry's -1 saying it was not coming from a PMC member. Any correctly justified -1 will of course be treated in the same way, regardless of who casts it. I'm aware of that. That is exactly why I applauded AOO's PMC members

Re: QA Improvements on 4.2.0

Hi Raphael, all > I believe the 4.1.4 shows us, that we have to do a better job in QA. A > minor release should never go to a rc5. I believe we all (and I pointing > my finger to myself) underestimated the regression risk at the 4.1.4. +1 > So, to do a better job in the 4.2.0 I propose the

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

> Let's test! ;-) > It's a bit difficult since neither the OP nor joesch describe the steps to test DDE in https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127601 However if the idea is to load dde-test.odt and then Update the values so that the values in odt reflect a change in the ods, then I do

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

Hi Matthias, all > We have buildbots building 4.1.4 every week... > In my opinion that is a waste of electric power and computing resources > Would it make sense to switch them to 4.1.5? > That would make a little more sense... It should be enough to change the Snap buildbots that are

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

> > > > > > > > > We have buildbots building 4.1.4 every week... > > > > > > > > In my opinion that is a waste of electric power and computing > > > resources > > > > > Well, it is important for the release process, but 4.1.4 is out > > now... >

Re: Spell checking in French

Hi Andrea, all P.S. I can volunteer to kick off a similar list of the available AOO languages (and links to the extensions) if the devs agree that it makes sense to link to such a page. At least a collection of links to Dictionaries that are not marked as such would be useful, thanks!

Re: Spell checking in French

Hi Marcus, all Actually the fastest way to add a dictionary should be clicking on Tools, Languages, More Dictionaries Online More Dictionaries Online should point to a user friendly page like Mozilla's https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/language-tools/ The problem is that the menu

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Availability of AOO-4.1.5 RC1

Hi all Available for immediate testing are the source tarballs/zips and community builds of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.5-RC1. As noted, these are Release Candidates and are not official, GA releases, although based on testing, the could become so. So PLEASE test these out! Installed and tested

Re: floating frame crash the calc

Hi Michael You wrote to the Developers mailing list. In the future please write to the user support list https://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html#users-mailing-list-public or at the user forum https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/ Regarding your specific problem, Hello, I have one

Re: shrunken display of file.

Answered to user directly. On 03/11/2017 23:05, denysm...@frontier.com wrote: I rubbed my hand over the touch pad and the text file I had been writing into shrunk to about one third the width of the screen. I have been unable to rub it back and when I open a new document it also is shrunken.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Public Beta for 4.2

Hi Jim, all > I do have a question about the BUILD number... > > Say we release 4.1.5 and that build number is 9799. We then > release start doing betas and RCs for 4.2.0 and use 9800, > 9801 and 9802. We then find out we need to release a 4.1.6. > Is that BUILD number now 9803?

Re: [PROPOSAL] Managing branches for future releases

Hi Andrea, all On 24/10/2017 21:25, Andrea Pescetti wrote: This will ensure that we can shift the focus to trunk while still keeping a branch that remains ready for a quick release if needed. If we are never in this situation, the next release will be from the current trunk and AOO415 will

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4 released

> > > > I think we as a community need to be more concerned about our > public perception in the future. > > > > Especially in Germany there are a lot of articles in which AOO is > > poorly presented, currently e. g: > >

Re: 4.2.0 minor errors

Every time a file comes in anothere package now this message appears. > > Regards > > Mechtilde > > Am 11.02.2018 um 23:05 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > > > > On 11/02/2018 Pedro Lino wrote: > > > > > > > d

Re: [Call for testing] AOO 4.2.0 for Windows built with MozillaBuild 3.x

Hi Matthias, all > Next Windows build now with MozillaBuild 3.2: > https://home.apache.org/~mseidel/AOO-builds/AOO-420-Test/ > Installed full pt version plus en_US language pack under Windows 7 x64 Used it for real work all day. Approved ;) Regards, Pedro

Re: 4.2.0 minor errors

> On May 7, 2018 at 5:57 PM Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > > Am 06.05.2018 um 20:04 schrieb Pedro Lino: > > > > Should I open an entry in the tracker? > > > > >

Re: Checking update failed

I had replied earlier but directly to the OP. Something is very wrong on the Apache server ping ooo-updates.apache.org PING ooo-updates.apache.org (40.79.78.1) 56(84) bytes of data. ^C --- ooo-updates.apache.org ping statistics --- 108 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time

Re: Checking update failed

> On June 11, 2018 at 11:13 PM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > > Am 11.06.2018 um 23:40 schrieb Marcus: > > > > Am 08.06.2018 um 19:01 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > > > > > > > The first bug report from a user: > > >

Re: Starting the 4.2.0 localization

Hi Andrea, all - The problem (not a problem actually; just the need to translate some hundreds strings again) I had empirically found for Italian indeed affects all languages. If you download a non-English build from https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/install/linux64/ or

Re: Windows developent plan

> Thats the points I am aware of. Are there more Windows specific points? Does upgrade from MSVC2008 mean dropping support for Win XP? The recently released LO 6.0 32bit requires at least Windows 7... - To unsubscribe,

Re: 4.2.0 minor errors

I'm not sure if this is related but the last version that updates correctly from 4.1.5 is r1816311 from Jim's archive All newer versions return dpkg: error processing archive openoffice-core01_4.2.0-1_amd64.deb (--install): trying to overwrite '/opt/openoffice4/program/gconfbe1.uno.so', which

Re: 4.2.0 minor errors

> What command line are you using? Are you installing all packages > altogether? I mean, I would expect that all files in /opt/openoffice4/ > are overwritten by files from the newer packages, and this is just > normal; but in your case it looks like there is a mismatch between the > old

Re: Windows developent plan

> > We had a discussion about special small update versions for Windows, > > some time ago. > > We had experimented with patches some years ago, but never released them > officially. That would be a great evolution for AOO (LO has finally added that feature in version 6). In fact saving

Re: Windows developent plan

Hi Matthias > > > > That would be a great evolution for AOO (LO has finally added > that feature in version 6). > > > > > AFAIK that feature didn't make it into 6.0: > https://fosdem.org/2018/schedule/event/ode_automatic_updater/ > > I read this version would include

Re: download of AOO

Maybe that is a UCBrowser problem or a temporary slow access to Sourceforge (the link in your report works perfectly at my end) In any case you can always download directly from Apache's server

Correct sentence about OpenOffice

Hi all The startcenter.desktop file says "The office productivity suite compatible to the open and standardized ODF document format. Supported by Apache OpenOffice." Shouldn't this be "The office productivity suite compatible *with* the open and standardized ODF document format. Supported by

Re: Correct sentence about OpenOffice

Hi Matthias > Yes, that wording always irritated me... > > On Windows the tooltips says: > The office productivity suite compatible to the open and standardized > ODF document format. Supported by The Apache Software Foundation. > I will then switch "compatible to" to "compatible

Re: Correct sentence about OpenOffice

Hi Matthias > Remember, the change would have to be localized for all available > languages... ;-) > Yes, in theory. But there are still references to Sun and Oracle so that rule has not been followed strictly ;) In any case the important part is to do our best with the resources

Re: Correct sentence about OpenOffice

Hi Matthias > I know of some references to Oracle/SUN. But if there is one in a > released language, it must be corrected! > You do have a Pootle account? ;-) > Isn't it the Pootle files that are not synced with the release? Isn't it better to edit the .desktop file and just upload

Re: Draft of a "Powered By" logo

Hi Keith, all > Here is a link to a proposed "Powered By" Logo. All comments or offers > to improve it are welcome. > http://www.evernote.com/l/AY4y_8tHWYNGMpPJF1P2Glikiyhp58NZZ8o/ > Attached are a slightly improved version of pb_OpenOffice and a version 2 using the "black with

Re: Draft of a "Powered By" logo

Hi Keith Looks good ;) Attached is the same in true vector hacked with the original Apache Powered by from https://www.apache.org/foundation/press/kit/poweredBy/ joined with Matthias Seidel fixed AOO logo Regards, Pedro

Re: Draft of a "Powered By" logo

Hi Dave, all > The Apache Powered By Ring is a standard. Please do not alter the style. > ??? > One thought that I had is our Powered by Apache OpenOffice could just put > the Gulls circle logo in the middle of the Ring > Something like the attached image? Regards, Pedro

Re: Draft of a "Powered By" logo

Hi David, all > > > > > > > > > > > The Apache Powered By Ring is a standard. Please do not > > alter the style. > > > > > > > > > > ??? > > > > > I meant that we should be using the Star version from the > > Foundation Powered By so that

Re: Draft of a "Powered By" logo

Hi Marcus > the graphic looks great. When it contains also the new Apache feather, > then it's perfect. The Apache feather is not part of the AOO logo so there is no requirement to include it https://www.apache.org/foundation/press/kit/poweredBy/Template.PNG as you can see from the jpg logos

Re: Draft of a "Powered By" logo

Hi Matthias > But if you export it to bitmap the inner area is transparent. I think the > logo should have white background. > It was deliberate. but I agree that in most cases it will work better with a white background. Done ;) My hack (I am not an artist) is based on existing Apache art

Re: Please test the new MWiki: https://wikitest.openoffice.org

Hi Andrea > Our MWiki needs to be moved to a new server since Infra is replacing old > hardware. It took some work and some help from Infra, but a test > instance is now available on a new server at > > https://wikitest.openoffice.org > > Please test it as follows: > - if you don't have an

Re: Please test the new MWiki: https://wikitest.openoffice.org

> On July 16, 2018 at 6:50 PM "Keith N. McKenna" mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net > wrote: > > > Account has been created and a temporary password has been mailed under > separate cover. It should be changed to one of your choice at first > login by going to preferences and

Re: [Discussion] Increase font size in AOO help?

> On July 22, 2018 at 10:49 PM Kay Schenk wrote: > As someone who is annoyed almost daily with font issues, the difference > between 10pt and 11pt is quite a bit. :) +1 Please do make that change! Anyone else having problems with Calc's Sheet name text size under Linux on a high DPI screen?

Re: Please test the new MWiki: https://wikitest.openoffice.org

> On July 15, 2018 at 10:09 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > MWiki accounts are created on request (to this list) and they are not > the same as CWiki accounts. The current migration only concerns MWiki; > CWiki is already on the new servers. Can you please create an MWiki account associated to

Re: Please test the new MWiki: https://wikitest.openoffice.org

Hi Keith > On July 16, 2018 at 3:43 PM "Keith N. McKenna" mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net > wrote: > > Due you have a preference for your user name or is pedlino (your cwiki > username) OK > pedlino is fine. Thanks! Regards, Pedro

Proposal for adoption of corrected Apache OpenOffice logo file

Hi all I don't know what is the appropriate procedure but would like to request a vote for the adoption of a corrected Apache OpenOffice logo vector file. Most of you are aware that the current logo was created by Chris Rottensteiner . Unfortunately all of the logos in vector format archived

Wrong distro detected?

Hi all I'm running Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) 32-bit but when I click on http://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html I am offered the Linux 32bit RPM. Can someone verify/fix this? Regards, Pedro

Re: Wrong distro detected?

> You are using Chrome? > > No. I'm using the included browser Firefox ESR 52.9.0 (32 bit)

Re: Wrong distro detected?

> Can you post your User Agent? > https://www.whoishostingthis.com/tools/user-agent/ > > Firefox on my system (Ubuntu 16.94) has: > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:61.0) Gecko/20100101 > Firefox/61.0 > > It identifies with "Ubuntu", so our website can guess the

Re: Wrong distro detected?

> On September 1, 2018 at 10:15 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote: > I am now using Opera 55 on Xubuntu 18.04.01 54 bit. Out of interest I > accessed the download site and it wanted to download Linux 64-bit (x86-64) > (RPM), whereas it should have been Linux 64-bit (x84-64) (DEB) > > My User Agent

Re: Wrong distro detected?

Hi Marcus > On September 2, 2018 at 9:06 AM Marcus wrote: > when you have problems with the download please have a look here: > https://www.openoffice.org/download/analyze.html That is an useful tool (maybe the link to it should be "Report download problems" instead of "Report broken link")

Re: Lazy consensus on adoption of corrected Apache OpenOffice logo file

Hi Matthias, all > On September 2, 2018 at 9:36 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > >> My suggestion would rather be to "fix" the existing graphic by only > >> converting the TM to paths. > > > > > > +1 for fixing the original one, instead of

Re: Wrong distro detected?

> On September 2, 2018 at 9:49 AM Matthias Seidel mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de > wrote: > > > > > Maybe something changed in Debian/Ubuntu? > > > > > No, but is your version from the repos? It seems to be an ESR > > (plain > Mozilla, no Ubuntu in the User Agent). >

Re: New Horizontal Line Icon Bottom Left of Screen

Hi Jon > I've bought the professional version of Andropen Office Professional > under account jonathan.simpso...@gmail.com, great app. > In the latest update have you updated the bottom bar to include access to > various Andropen Office options? I can't recall it being there

Lazy consensus on adoption of corrected Apache OpenOffice logo file

e comment inline each glyph. I would prefer not to modify the file at this point. In any case this email and explanation are public. Regards Pedro > > On Aug 30, 2018, at 2:41 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > > > Hi all > > > > I don't know what is the appropri

Re: App icons for Windows

Hi Matthias, all > I would like to update the 6 icons for Writer, Calc, Impress, Draw, Base > and Math. > > Opinions? > According to the OpenOffice.org page on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org#OpenOffice.org_3 "On 13 October 2008, version 3.0 was released".

Re: Wrong distro detected?

Hi Rory, all > On September 2, 2018 at 12:25 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote: > > On a similar Xubuntu 18.04.01 64 bit machine, using Firefox I am > > offered OO Linux 64-bit (x86-64) (DEB) > > > > On that machine User Agent details are > > Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux

Re: Wrong distro detected?

Actually that was not correct. Mozilla provides the tar.bz2 when it detects Linux... Ah, well... > On September 2, 2018 at 12:41 PM Pedro Lino wrote: > Curiously, the previous link offers me the right DEBS so we (AOO) we need to > find out how Mozilla does it... Anyone with an RPM bas

Re: SVN trunk: Windows build crashes on startup

Hi Damjan I'm running AOO420m1(Build:9800) - Rev. 1828644 from the Buildbot under Windows 7 x64 without any problems. Hope this helps... Regards, Pedro > On April 11, 2018 at 12:29 PM Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > > Hi > > First I thought it was a patch I was developing, but even

Re: Time to push on for 4.2.0

> Localization is, so to say, under my "ownership" (meaning: it's an area > where I've volunteered to lead the effort); but I can't commit to > getting it done by a certain deadline right now. Volunteers welcome, of > course; even beginners. I have previously volunteered to get the Portuguese

Re: Bad news regarding future Java use?

SDK. > > > > > >Phil > > > >This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM > > > > > >On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Pedro Lino <pedro.l...@mailbox.org> > >wrote: > >> Hi all > >> > >> I just updated Java 8 and got a

Re: Bad news regarding future Java use?

> People reading something, jumping to conclusions, and freaking out. Move > along, nothing to see here... > I don't think so. Maybe there is a good reason why another office suite moved all the scripting to Python. > Facts: there are OpenJDK builds for Windows, Linux, Mac and even

Bad news regarding future Java use?

Hi all I just updated Java 8 and got a notification saying "You have successfully installed Java. Important Information about Oracle Java SE Roadmap: Changes are coming which will impact your access to future releases of Java SE from Oracle. Corporate users will be impacted as soon as January

Re: Test r1828081 build (Mac, OS2)

Hi Damjan, all > In r1828081 I ported multiple libraries and external dependencies with > unusual naming to gbuild. Windows definitely builds, but other systems, > particularly Mac and OS2, might not. Please test. > Build 1828108 Linux x86-64 installed on Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS without

Re: Does AOO 4.2.x need new system requirements?

> On March 25, 2018 at 12:32 PM Marcus wrote: > I tend to agree but the wording is important. With "official support" > this would look like as we have built and tested on this platform. As we > haven't done this we should avoid this misunderstanding. > > Instead we can

Re: extension problem

> On March 16, 2018 at 8:12 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > > Dave Brondsema wrote: > > On 3/15/18 6:57 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> For example, https://t.co/sZTK7wwASJ and https://t.co/HV0HdhJLGR (listed > >> there) > >> are still broken. And others from that list are

Re: extension problem

> On March 19, 2018 at 8:32 PM Dave Brondsema <d...@brondsema.net> wrote: > > > On 3/16/18 4:37 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > But Comments on extensions are still broken and return > > > > "Your comment is waiting for moderator approval. > > &

Re: Status on 4.2.0?

> Technically seen: > To unpack the installation files and to start the installation with MSI. > > Historically seen: > I don't know! ;-) > The nsis installer extracts and runs the MSVC runtime libraries installer before running the AOO installer. Since AOO is compiled with MSVC

Re: Reporting broken download link

Hi Leandro Sourceforge is currently having some problems. You can download directly from the Apache server http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.5/binaries/he/ Hope this helps, Pedro

Re: [Call for testing] AOO 4.2.0 for Windows built with MozillaBuild 3.1.1

Hi Matthias > Do you have Windows 32-bit available? > Only Windows XP 32-bit > Things to test: > Can you search for updates (AOO or Extension manager) without getting en > error? > Both work perfectly (I downgraded one extension to check) > Also the dialog under "Tools -

Re: Help building AOO416 on Ubuntu 16.04

> JDK 8 is OK as long as you use --disable-odk in configure. > Hopefully we can get a patch into 4.1.6 that will allow us to build ODK > with Java 8 > Excellent! Thank you for confirming. -disable-odk is included in the Step-by-step guide so that is what I will be using Regards,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >