On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:31 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
Two thoughts:
1. Concerned people found it problematically that OOo depended so much
on SUN and later Oracle.
So the situation under the roof of the Apache Software Foundation is a
real progress. So we
On 2014-10 -23, at 07:36, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:31 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
Two thoughts:
1. Concerned people found it problematically that OOo depended so much
on SUN and later Oracle.
So the situation under the roof
This problem has indirectly to do with the lack of marketing efforts the
community has been victim off.
Without going into further rant, there should be some attention being put
to what the project is communicating right now.
On Oct 23, 2014 6:37 AM, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct
Am 10/23/2014 01:36 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:31 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
Two thoughts:
1. Concerned people found it problematically that OOo depended so much
on SUN and later Oracle.
So the situation under the roof of the Apache Software
On 10/23/2014 04:36 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:31 AM, RA Stehmann
anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote:
Two thoughts:
1. Concerned people found it problematically that OOo depended so much
on SUN and later Oracle.
So the situation under the roof of the Apache Software
On 21/10/14 18:00, Mateusz Zasuwik wrote:
For instance, here:
In other words, for some reason, development of OpenOffice has all but
stalled, while LibreOffice remains an active project.
Much of OpenOffice's recent decline may be due to IBM's withdrawal from the
project. OpenOffice 4.1.1.
2014-10-22 9:56 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com:
On 21/10/14 18:00, Mateusz Zasuwik wrote:
For instance, here:
In other words, for some reason, development of OpenOffice has all but
stalled, while LibreOffice remains an active project.
Much of OpenOffice's recent
2014-10-22 20:35 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Zasuwik mzasu...@gmail.com:
2014-10-22 9:56 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com:
On 21/10/14 18:00, Mateusz Zasuwik wrote:
For instance, here:
In other words, for some reason, development of OpenOffice has all but
stalled, while
On 21/10/2014 Mateusz Zasuwik wrote:
...Blogs/Off-the-Beat-Bruce-Byfield-s-Blog/LibreOffice-OpenOffice-and-rumors-of-unification
In short, your links are not very significant. I assume you are doing it
in good faith, but the above is not well-sourced (and the disappeared
developers all
On 10/22/2014 12:18 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
2014-10-22 20:35 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Zasuwik mzasu...@gmail.com:
2014-10-22 9:56 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com:
On 21/10/14 18:00, Mateusz Zasuwik wrote:
For instance, here:
In other words, for some reason, development of
3. So... Is it true that IBM withdrew their dev employees?
Rumor or hoax
Where did you hear this?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
For instance, here:
In other words, for some reason, development of OpenOffice has all but
stalled, while LibreOffice remains an active project.
Much of OpenOffice's recent decline may be due to IBM's withdrawal from the
project. OpenOffice 4.1.1. An anonymous informant alleges -- and web
Reading this thread really makes me sad !
Its basicually the same discussion I experienced when I joined 2 years ago,
not much have changed.. The tone is still the same AOO is superior and LO
lives by copying our code.
In my opinion BOTH projects have made a lot of progress on their own (NOT
by
orcnotes below.
-Original Message-
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 07:58
To: dev
Subject: Re: Concerns about the AOO community
[ ... ]
In my opinion BOTH projects have made a lot of progress on their own (NOT
by using code from the other
be told that this is
what the communities want, and make it happen.
/Larry
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 10:13 AM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: Concerns about the AOO community
orcnotes below
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 10:58 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
.
.
.
Independent of the number of mails, It is a fact that this list, even
though called dev@, contains nearly no development discussions nor does
these discussions take place elsewhere publicly.
.
.
.
Hi Jan, are you having
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 10:58 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Independent of the number of mails, It is a fact that this list, even
though called dev@, contains nearly no development discussions nor does
Hi Jan, are you having problems with your list subscription? You
might
jan i wrote:
Its basicually the same discussion I experienced when I joined 2 years ago,
not much have changed..
I'm mostly ignoring this thread since it is based on a premise that is
not true. But you make some good points below, so I'll address them.
It is also a fact (SADLY) that LO and
On 02/10/2014 Roman Sausarnes wrote:
And I'm here to help, not just complain :) I'm still working out how I can
contribute...
Well, start by improving the wiki then! I agree that the building guide
can be restructured better, especially in the steps that lead you from
the main page to the
On 02/10/14 01:44, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
On G+ I have hold a conversation with Bruce Byfield and Jos from KDE
about the continuation of the Apache OpenOffice community and how the
way that the community has enter lately into a
It would be better for the projects to merge, but the details (license,
community) clearly matter a lot to some people. If there was a better
spirit of cooperation most of the effort could go into AOO with just some
minor things for the GPL version derived from it in an agreed way so that
that
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 05:47
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Concerns about the AOO community
It would be better for the projects to merge, but the details (license,
community) clearly matter a lot to some people. If there was a better
spirit of cooperation most
I've seen quite a number of new people show up here lately indicating
interest coming from someplace. If one out of 10 of them sticks and
becomes a regular contributor the project is in a very good position I
think.
My observations regarding LO:
1) They've copied some features from MS Office
Hello,
As a newcomer to development who is looking for a way to get involved in
one project or the other, I thought I would share my impressions.
The LibreOffice website and development materials seem friendlier to
newcomers. It is easier to navigate and find simple instructions for how to
get
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Roman Sausarnes romansausar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
As a newcomer to development who is looking for a way to get involved in
one project or the other, I thought I would share my impressions.
The LibreOffice website and development materials seem
Le 02.10.2014 19:38, Alexandro Colorado a écrit :
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Roman Sausarnes
romansausar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
As a newcomer to development who is looking for a way to get involved
in
one project or the other, I thought I would share my impressions.
The
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Roman Sausarnes romansausar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
As a newcomer to development who is looking for a way to get involved in
one project or the other, I thought I would share my
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Alain Sanguinetti al...@sanguinetti.eu
wrote:
Le 02.10.2014 19:38, Alexandro Colorado a écrit :
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Roman Sausarnes
romansausar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
As a newcomer to development who is looking for a way to get
I swear I am technically savvy, but I have not found an easy link to the
materials you reference.
I start at the homepage - www.openoffice.org
I click on I want to participate in OpenOffice link which takes me here:
http://openoffice.apache.org/get-involved.html
I clink on the New Volunteer
the developer training materials. My bad.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Roman Sausarnes [mailto:romansausar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 10:26
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Concerns about the AOO community
Hello,
As a newcomer to development who is looking
On 10/02/2014 11:18 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On 10/2/14, Roman Sausarnes romansausar...@gmail.com wrote:
I swear I am technically savvy, but I have not found an easy link to the
materials you reference.
I start at the homepage - www.openoffice.org
I click on I want to participate in
Chuck Davis wrote:
I've seen quite a number of new people show up here lately
indicating interest coming from someplace. If one out of 10 of them
sticks and becomes a regular contributor the project is in a very
good position I think.
Agreed.
My observations regarding LO: 1) They've
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Dave Barton d...@tasit.net wrote:
Chuck Davis wrote:
I've seen quite a number of new people show up here lately
indicating interest coming from someplace. If one out of 10 of them
sticks and becomes a regular contributor the project is in a very
good
On G+ I have hold a conversation with Bruce Byfield and Jos from KDE
about the continuation of the Apache OpenOffice community and how the
way that the community has enter lately into a dormant stage with very
little traffic.
Althought I do seem that is an exageration, I feel that is true that
As a moderator of the dev list, I can't say I have noticed any reduction in
traffic. If anything its increasing.
On 1 October 2014 21:34, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
On G+ I have hold a conversation with Bruce Byfield and Jos from KDE
about the continuation of the Apache
I see well they are still piling on if anyone interested in giving
example how this community is not 'diying'.
https://plus.google.com/u/1/107133120166691255011/posts/QUksBJiVLzd?cfem=1
Since Bruce is a prominent writer for Linux Magazine I think is worth
to educate him on these matters, and
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
On G+ I have hold a conversation with Bruce Byfield and Jos from KDE
about the continuation of the Apache OpenOffice community and how the
way that the community has enter lately into a dormant stage with very
little
On 02/10/2014 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Since Bruce is a prominent writer for Linux Magazine I think is worth
to educate him on these matters
To answer the first false fact he mentions,
why has it been so quiet in the last few weeks on the mailing lists?
Not long ago, even a day without
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 02/10/2014 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
Since Bruce is a prominent writer for Linux Magazine I think is worth
to educate him on these matters
To answer the first false fact he mentions,
why has it been so quiet in
39 matches
Mail list logo
