Canal TP libère du code pour OpenStreetMap
http://www.canaltp.fr/non-classe/canal-tp-libere-du-code-pour-openstreetmap/
--
Cyrille.
___
dev-fr mailing list
dev-fr@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev-fr
I've been working on methods of using external datasources as background
vector layers in P2 and JOSM and have come up against a few issues.
Background: P2 has excellent support for data layers but their full power is
not exposed to the user by default. I am contemplating using snapshot-server
Hi Paweł,
On 11 November 2012 21:24, Paweł Paprota ppa...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Hi all,
On Friday I have implemented a simple validation in the OWL plugin that
checks whether given entity action (create/modify/delete) can be applied to
the current database state. See implementation: [1].
By
On 14 Nov 2012, at 11:48, Paweł Paprota ppa...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On 11/14/2012 12:33 PM, Brett Henderson wrote:
It sounds good to me. Osmosis typically tries to maintain data accuracy
with no surprises, so I'm not particularly happy with the current
situation of dropping ways even if
There is anyway an issue with the current Trac instance :
source: subversion/applications/rendering/mapnik/osm.xml @ 28049
HTML preview not available, since the file size exceeds 102400 bytes.
Could somebody increase this limit to 200-300K ? According to the wiki it's
in
Kai Krueger wrote:
Dane Springmeyer wrote
I'm sorry about not providing Windows binaries yet for Mapnik 2.x. The
holdup is that I have a dev environment working that is running Visual
Studio 2010, and I need to get a parallel setup running Visual Studio
2008
for support compiling the python
Hi,
On 11/13/2012 11:36 PM, Tom MacWright wrote:
There is no
way to 'just do it' until the style is actually maintained in GitHub,
actually welcomes contributions, and has active maintainers.
Point 3 (active maintainers) is undoubtedly true.
Point 2 (welcome contributions) is slightly
On 11/14/2012 12:04 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Point 1 is purely a matter of taste; people are just doing it with
trac as well (and suffering from 2/3 there too).
Surely you cannot deny the fact that Github has extremely positive
effects on development?
Why Trac has nowhere near such an
Hi,
On 11/14/2012 12:57 PM, Paweł Paprota wrote:
With open source projects nowadays, having something in SVN and Trac is
like putting it in the basement and waiting until someone asks to see
your basement...
This particular basement seems to have been visited at least 400 times
without us
Hi all,
On 14/11/12 12:57, Paweł Paprota wrote:
Surely you cannot deny the fact that Github has extremely positive
effects on development?
I don't see the point in discussing SVN/Trac vs. Git/GitHub as both
systems are already in place. :-)
The problem I see is that both systems are
On 11/14/2012 01:09 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I fully agree that GitHub is popular, but it is a pet peeve of mine
to point out that alternatives exist, just like other people will
complain if an Open Source project runs its mailing list on Google or
so. With GitHub in the hands of a commercial
On 11/14/2012 01:10 PM, Simon Legner wrote:
Hi all,
On 14/11/12 12:57, Paweł Paprota wrote:
Surely you cannot deny the fact that Github has extremely positive
effects on development?
I don't see the point in discussing SVN/Trac vs. Git/GitHub as both
systems are already in place. :-)
The
Matt Amos wrote:
i'd sound a note of caution about having separate clean and
detailed styles. we sort-of did that before with mapnik and
osmarender respectively and... well, we don't have
osmarender any more.
That was a technology failure, though, rather than anything wrong with the
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I fully agree that GitHub is popular, but it is a pet peeve of mine to point
out that alternatives exist, just like other people will complain if an Open
Source project runs its mailing list on Google or so. With GitHub in the hands
of a commercial
On Nov 14, 2012, at 3:57 AM, Paweł Paprota wrote:
On 11/14/2012 12:04 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Point 1 is purely a matter of taste; people are just doing it with
trac as well (and suffering from 2/3 there too).
Surely you cannot deny the fact that Github has extremely positive effects on
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
- we don't have a debugging view, and that leads to inappropriate pressure
on the showcase style (e.g. the 8,000 tints for subtly different forms of
landuse)
Actually we do, and that's the data layer.
On 14/11/2012 16:34, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
Unfortunately, I think there's a perception that the data layer
doesn't provide the gratification that mappers want.
Absolutely, and it never well. The data layer looks less like a map than
the MapCSS renderings in Potlatch and JOSM do. It's no
On 11/14/2012 05:34 PM, Michal Migurski wrote:
Why Trac has nowhere near such an effect I couldn't say but it is
just the truth that once you put something on Github, people are
*much* more likely to contribute.
[citation needed]
My statement was based on my own experience with open source
Le mercredi 14 novembre 2012 17:34:17, Eugene Alvin Villar a écrit :
Actually we do, and that's the data layer. Unfortunately, I think there's a
perception that the data layer doesn't provide the gratification that
mappers want. Or maybe we just need to highlight this layer more.
IMHO Your
Lennard l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
This requires a reload of the database to at least get
public_transport=* in.
To get a little bit more flexibility which such stuff we now use hstore and
views on the german-style tileserver.
The overhead is acceptable when using --hstore-match-only
Our views
On 14/11/12 17:53, Paweł Paprota wrote:
I cannot be bothered to find some hard evidence that Github makes
people much likely to contribute though, it's just a fact. :-)
Thats not the problem, people being likely to contribute! It's
maintenance. Stop this github makes everything better insanity,
kristy van putten writes:
This is my first time on this list, so apologies if I am asking the same
question as someone else. I have a team of GIS people digitising in
OpenStreetMap and we have found that there is no imagery for a section of
the area we really need to digitise. I have got
From: Russ Nelson [mailto:nel...@crynwr.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 6:32 PM
To: kristy van putten
Cc: josm-dev@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [josm-dev] Adding your own imagery
kristy van putten writes:
This is my first time on this list, so apologies if I am asking the
HI,
Thank you very much for everyones help, I was able to take simon advice and
convert the ecw file to jpeg with a worldfile and import it in using the
importimageplugin. I did have to up the JOSM memory to do this, following
the instructions on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Mac
Thanks
24 matches
Mail list logo
