I've a C question :)
Why cannot I use:
printf(%s\n, IT WORKS);
and have to use:
fprintf(stderr, %s\n, IT WORKS);
in the mod_perl sources?
Doug, I've figured what was my problem :)
Here is the relevant part of the trace (it was segfaulting when I was
using printf):
(gdb) where
#0
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
I've a C question :)
Why cannot I use:
printf(%s\n, IT WORKS);
and have to use:
fprintf(stderr, %s\n, IT WORKS);
in the mod_perl sources?
something todo with PerlIO, turns printf, fprintf, etc. into macros.
i always use
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
what happens if $args-{order} is defined, but is none of
rotate|random|repeat when somebody mistypes the value or --order? This
code will die. My original code was just silently ignoring this option if
it's an unknown one.
i don't think an unknown
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
what happens if $args-{order} is defined, but is none of
rotate|random|repeat when somebody mistypes the value or --order? This
code will die. My original code was just silently ignoring this option if
Ok, here is the summary of the 'make source_scan' issue.
using the Scan.pm from Doug's site with the patch:
--- /home/dougm/tar/Scan.pm Mon Jun 25 16:38:02 2001
+++ /home/dougm/perl/C-Scan-0.75/Scan.pmWed May 2 20:57:45 2001
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@
}
my $stream = $class-new(@_);
i have a script to automate that (below). i left the generated .t's out
for the moment, wondering if some might become non-autogenerated and
checked in, not that it would hurt if that happened and they were also in
.cvsignore
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
#handy to generate .cvsignore entries
#e.g.
#
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
So if I add a new feature and want to add it via source_scan, only you can
do that if don't want to overwrite each others version of
xs/tables/current/Apache/FunctionTable.pm. Do you think we should make
sourcescan produce an identical code, no matter
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
i have a script to automate that (below). i left the generated .t's out
for the moment, wondering if some might become non-autogenerated and
checked in, not that it would hurt if that happened and they were also in
.cvsignore
the cool thing is
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
so may be:
system cvs add .cvsignore;
system cvs ci -m 'ignore these' .cvsignore;
i just do the commit by hand, after doing another diff to make sure i the
script didn't break something.
Will you make it a part of the rep or do you plan
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
So if I add a new feature and want to add it via source_scan, only you can
do that if don't want to overwrite each others version of
xs/tables/current/Apache/FunctionTable.pm. Do you think we should make
10 matches
Mail list logo
