I've mungled protocol/echo to do something fancier. Dunno whether it's
worth adding or not. It's only fun if you run it with -v, and we can
supply our own knowledge base to talk our way :)
% ./t/TEST -v protocol/eliza
setting ulimit to allow core files
ulimit -c unlimited
exec ./t/TEST -v
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'm working on implementing PerlSetEnv/PerlPassEnv right now.
1. I see that SetEnv elem is missing from modperl_config_srv_t struct? I
can see it only in modperl_config_dir_t struct. Does that mean that we
cannot have a PerlSetEnv in httpd.conf's main
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
I also have a question regarding apr_table_t. When creating the table with
apr_table_make one has to specify nelts. But then it grows automatically
as required (right?), so what's the point of nelts then? pre-alloc? In any
case what netls should I use
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
I think Doug has planned to have it as a standalone project, which is fine
with me, but it's absolutely a must to have it in the core distribution,
rather than in Bundle. Most of the people use mod_perl because
Apache::Registry and PerlRun, so having
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
I wonder how many people actually take advantage of NameWithVirtualHost=1.
seems that the PerlRun methodology (filenames) is a much cleaner solution
that invites less problems/confusion.
using filenames makes for long packages names == lengthy
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
I've noticed that currently we don't run the tests under -T, this patch
enables -T mode and fixes one taint problem.
oh good, go ahead and apply.
BTW, Doug, try to comment out the untaint patch in the second file.
apache/post dumps core then, when
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
The new scanning for the core file is nice, but many times I get a false
alarm when I get an old core file alert. This patch warns the user when a
core file is found before tests have started.
good idea.
but how to break this habit of yours? ;-)
+sub
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
I've mungled protocol/echo to do something fancier. Dunno whether it's
worth adding or not. It's only fun if you run it with -v, and we can
supply our own knowledge base to talk our way :)
way cool!
+use constant HAS_ELIZA = eval { require
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:48:26AM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Philippe M . Chiasson wrote:
The following patch makes sure that MP_APXS is an absolute path. If you used
MP_APXS=../deps/httpd/bin/apxs it would make a bunch of things fail ;-)
thanks, could you send
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
a new CPAN::Grab is attached. See the README file for more info. Once you
think it does what you want I'll upload it to CPAN.
killer, thanks stas!!
does it work for you? Should it go to CPAN, or do we want
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
File::Compare is quite useless. We need to compare a variable against the
file.
then use 'eq', really, i just don't see a need for checksums here.
but File::Compare should be usable, if changes to the
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
I wonder how many people actually take advantage of NameWithVirtualHost=1.
seems that the PerlRun methodology (filenames) is a much cleaner solution
that invites less problems/confusion.
using
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 10:08:25AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
a new CPAN::Grab is attached. See the README file for more info. Once you
think it does what you want I'll upload it to CPAN.
killer,
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
The new scanning for the core file is nice, but many times I get a false
alarm when I get an old core file alert. This patch warns the user when a
core file is found before tests have started.
good idea.
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 10:09:28AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
File::Compare is quite useless. We need to compare a variable against the
file.
then use 'eq', really, i just don't see a need for
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 10:09:28AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
File::Compare is quite useless. We need to compare a variable against the
file.
then
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
does it work for you? Should it go to CPAN, or do we want to keep it for
us? :) If CPAN, is the name OK or should I announce it first on modules
newsgroup?
i haven't actually tried it yet. but its up to you if it should go on
cpan, i would vote yes.
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
what's the replacement of NameWithVirtualHost? Obviously we need something
to distinguish between vhs.
well, if possible we should distinguish between the uri and requested
resource instead. in otherwords, we have the:
r-uri = r-filename translation,
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
so there is no way to trap such SEGV? I wanted to work on automatic SEGV
trapping and automatically producing the trace, I thought that was a good
example to work with.
not with a Perl signal handler. however, you can install a C signal
handler and
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
Still can you please share your thoughts about the new Apache::Registry.
How would you like it to be? Thanks.
my thoughts are already in Apache::{PerlRun,RegistryNG,PerlRunXS}, etc. :)
i'd rather stand
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
does it work for you? Should it go to CPAN, or do we want to keep it for
us? :) If CPAN, is the name OK or should I announce it first on modules
newsgroup?
i haven't actually tried it yet.
so I won't do
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
something like that. We need to disregard: 'Sun Aug 19 10:32:24 2001'
that would be fine. as i suggested eariler, feel free to change the
format of that header which includes the date to make it easier to rip
this stuff out. i'd rather see this than a
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
cool. I'm not interested in perl trace (it was just an example), i want to
catch segv, fire gdb and get the bt trace, and get the email report
without user doing anything at all.
since ulimit is setup now
23 matches
Mail list logo
