sweet, great work guys. the patch i have from randy seems to be truncated
(the tarball with mod_perl.{dsp,mak.def} looks ok though. sterls can you
send me the current patch against current cvs? thanks!
-
To unsubscribe,
thanks, works like a charm. curious, should mod_perl.dsp be cvs add-ed
with -kb? i seem to recall cvs changing the file (stripping ^M's ?)
i also added mod_perl.def to the MANIFEST, we don't want to include
mod_perl.mak or do we?
- Original Message -
From: "John K Sterling" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Doug MacEachern" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Randy Kobes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2000 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix
of days.
sterling
Randy Kobes wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "John K Sterling" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Randy Kobes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix
sounds g
- Original Message -
From: "John K Sterling" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Randy Kobes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix
sounds great randy - do what you gotta do
Randy Kobes wrote:
would people get
too confused if a mod_perl.so was installed if they were building
against apache_1.3.12, say? Should we have an Apache version
check in there to use mod_perl.so for 1.3.15 and ApacheModulePerl.dll
for pre-1.3.15?
Great point - this would also allow us
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, John K Sterling wrote:
sorry it took so long to respond i had some 'real work' issues :) anyhoo, i am
really torn on this one. I still think mod_perl should immediately just switch
to the new-style .so - mod_perl has always been the closest darling to apache so
it only
sounds great randy - do what you gotta do - i'll check it out on the other end
testing/proofing
sterling
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, John K Sterling wrote:
sorry it took so long to respond i had some 'real work' issues :) anyhoo, i am
really torn on this one. I still think
2) only the ApacheModulePerl.dll has been changed to mod_perl.so to
limit the diff
I didn't take a look at 1.3.15, but shouldn't it be mod_perl.dll instead of
mod_perl.so on win32 ? Or do they really use the .so extension also on win32
?
Gerald
yeah, its .so
take a look at the thread on new-httpd
basically on win32 it really don't matter none what the extension is
microsoft .ocx files and .cpl files are apparently just dlls with a different
suffix.
sterling
Gerald Richter wrote:
2) only the ApacheModulePerl.dll has been
10 matches
Mail list logo
