Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0 STATUS

2003-10-22 Thread Stas Bekman
Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: How do you make something a 'private resource' in META.yml? http://module-build.sourceforge.net/META-spec.html doesn't have anything about it? Or am I looking at the wrong place? It's outdated. See: http://www.xray.mpe.mp

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0 STATUS

2003-10-21 Thread Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Stas Bekman wrote: > > Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > > How do you make something a 'private resource' in META.yml? > > > > http://module-build.sourceforge.net/META-spec.html doesn't have > > anything about it? Or am I looking at the wrong place? > > It's outdated. See: > http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.d

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0 STATUS

2003-10-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: Seems people haven't decided between no_index and private: The latest version of Module::Install's META.yml has this bit: no_index: directory: - inc private: directory: - inc Please mention that in the thread I've just started on p5p. Thanks. _

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0 STATUS

2003-10-21 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
Seems people haven't decided between no_index and private: The latest version of Module::Install's META.yml has this bit: no_index: directory: - inc private: directory: - inc On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 14:32, Stas Bekman wrote: > Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > > How do you make something a

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0 STATUS

2003-10-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: How do you make something a 'private resource' in META.yml? http://module-build.sourceforge.net/META-spec.html doesn't have anything about it? Or am I looking at the wrong place? It's outdated. See: http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2003-05/msg00089

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0 STATUS

2003-10-21 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
How do you make something a 'private resource' in META.yml? http://module-build.sourceforge.net/META-spec.html doesn't have anything about it? Or am I looking at the wrong place? On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 11:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > stas2003/10/21 11:03:31 > > Modified:.S

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0 STATUS

2003-03-10 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stas2003/03/02 19:50:55 Modified:.STATUS Log: log the issue with ${^TAINT} returning -1 with blead-perl-ithreads Can somebody please test whether you get t/TEST modperl/taint fail on winXX with ithreads blead perl? (it won'

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0 STATUS

2003-03-02 Thread Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stas2003/03/02 19:50:55 Modified:.STATUS Log: log the issue with ${^TAINT} returning -1 with blead-perl-ithreads Can somebody please test whether you get t/TEST modperl/taint fail on winXX with ithreads blead perl? (it won't fail with 5.8.0, sin

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0 STATUS

2003-01-01 Thread Stas Bekman
Randy Kobes wrote: On 1 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dougm 2003/01/01 10:43:51 Modified:.STATUS Log: must be fixed before 1.99_08 Revision ChangesPath 1.28 +3 -5 modperl-2.0/STATUS + * Makefile.PL process ugly "unknown typemap" warnings must go a

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0 STATUS

2003-01-01 Thread Randy Kobes
On 1 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > dougm 2003/01/01 10:43:51 > > Modified:.STATUS > Log: > must be fixed before 1.99_08 > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.28 +3 -5 modperl-2.0/STATUS > > + * Makefile.PL process ugly "unknown typemap" warnings mus