On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
So is modperl_require_module() is used only for CORE::require()? If so
at the moment, yes.
- do we need modperl_use_module() to implement CORE::use
into what namespace would things be imported?
- should it be based on modperl_require_module() and
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
- shouldn't PerlRequire be just an alias for PerlModule? since apparently
its implementation seem to be identical to PerlModule.
PerlRequire puts quotes around the value, since PerlRequire is a file,
whereas PerlModule is a bareword.
So is
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
OK I've finally wrapped my head around how things work at the server
startup.
This [the patch at the bottom] is a crude proof of concept code for
PerlModule. Before I wrap it all nicely, please tell me if that's more or
less how things should be
OK I've finally wrapped my head around how things work at the server
startup.
This [the patch at the bottom] is a crude proof of concept code for
PerlModule. Before I wrap it all nicely, please tell me if that's more or
less how things should be done. This is my first take on adding a new
