On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
I assume that if Apache is built with LFS, we do need them (though I
think apxs will take care of that). What about if perl is - can we
really get away without not using LFS when perl is?
we can get away with it because Perl never passes lfs
sweet, great work guys. the patch i have from randy seems to be truncated
(the tarball with mod_perl.{dsp,mak.def} looks ok though. sterls can you
send me the current patch against current cvs? thanks!
-
To unsubscribe,
thanks, works like a charm. curious, should mod_perl.dsp be cvs add-ed
with -kb? i seem to recall cvs changing the file (stripping ^M's ?)
i also added mod_perl.def to the MANIFEST, we don't want to include
mod_perl.mak or do we?
- Original Message -
From: "John K Sterling" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Doug MacEachern" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Randy Kobes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2000 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix
thanks, works like a charm.
