On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
There have been a lot of interesting development around Inline::
namespace. Especially at the recent YAPC::NA (which I've skipped, but read
the logs from those who were there).
Especially interesting
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
That, and XS really isn't that
hard. Like anything, it takes a bit of learning (as did mod_perl when I
started using it!), and there could do to be a good book on it.
Simon Cozens is working on 'Perl 5 Internals' book. I'm looking forward to
put
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
That, and XS really isn't that
hard. Like anything, it takes a bit of learning (as did mod_perl when I
started using it!), and there could do to be a good book on it.
Simon Cozens is working on 'Perl
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'm not sure how to approach this one. Should I log this issue somewhere
in todo/ ?
sure.
I did. It deletes the files on shutdown.
Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestServer.pm:199: $self-clean unless $aborted;
hmm, something else was causing the log to
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
I've 2 proposals:
1. --run-tests to be a hash option accepting:
--run-tests --repeat=N --run-tests --rotate=[Y/N]
with the default of --repeat=1 and --rotate=Y
also may be we can do --rotate and --norotate to get the reverse instead
of Y/N.
the answer on using Inline (even if it were in the perl dist) for modperl
core is the same as the last time you asked.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
I've 2 proposals:
1. --run-tests to be a hash option accepting:
--run-tests --repeat=N --run-tests --rotate=[Y/N]
with the default of --repeat=1 and --rotate=Y
also may be we can do --rotate
one question we should rethink is whether to have docs in their own
modperl-2.0-docs cvs tree on all in a modperl-2.0/docs subdirectory.
i'm pretty sure cvs allows access control so certain people can write to
docs/ but not ../
the other reason for the split is if we want to release docs more
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
sure, what would be a suggested format?
--run-tests[=N:[rotate|repeat|randomize]]? (including my new idea for
randomizinging the order. Any better idea for the three words that turn
tests a, b into:
a, a, b, b (repeat?)
a, b, a, b (rotate?)
b, a,
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
one question we should rethink is whether to have docs in their own
modperl-2.0-docs cvs tree on all in a modperl-2.0/docs subdirectory.
i'm pretty sure cvs allows access control so certain people can write to
docs/ but not ../
I think it's just
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Ken Williams wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matt Sergeant) wrote:
Except that until Inline is included in core, it won't be a widely used
way to build performant code, IMHO.
Jarkko offered to put Inline into the core, and Brian actually refused.
The reason is that he's
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
i'm pretty sure cvs allows access control so certain
people can write to docs/ but not ../
it doesn't actually; you have to rely on unix permissions.
would you really trust somebody to write docs that you
wouldn't trust to write code? i wouldn't.
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, brian moseley wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
i'm pretty sure cvs allows access control so certain
people can write to docs/ but not ../
it doesn't actually; you have to rely on unix permissions.
would you really trust somebody to write docs that
13 matches
Mail list logo
