Re: [racket-dev] 2htdp/image Feature Suggestion

2014-06-29 Thread Jos Koot
Thanks. I always use DrRacket for editing racket code. Jos. -Original Message- From: Greg Hendershott [mailto:greghendersh...@gmail.com] Sent: domingo, 29 de junio de 2014 5:55 To: Jos Koot Cc: dev; jja.k...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [racket-dev] 2htdp/image Feature Suggestion

Re: [racket-dev] 2htdp/image Feature Suggestion

2014-06-23 Thread Jos Koot
In the recommendations of http://docs.racket-lang.org/style/index.html it is recommended to use (internal or module top-level) define rather than named let. I use named let a lot. How would you rewrite the following? For me it is rather difficult to make the change without loosing track of the

Re: [racket-dev] Proposal for a no-argument

2012-07-02 Thread Jos Koot
May be the discussion goes beyond my understanding, in which case sorry for my noise. Where I need a value distinct from all other values (such as a no-value), I prepare an empty struct type and export one single instance of this struct together with its predicate (and nothing else) Jos

Re: [racket-dev] [racket-bug] all/11778: check syntax does not workwith path-up

2011-08-17 Thread Jos Koot
+1, jos -Original Message- From: dev-boun...@racket-lang.org [mailto:dev-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Matthias Felleisen Sent: miƩrcoles, 17 de agosto de 2011 22:34 To: Racket Dev Subject: Re: [racket-dev] [racket-bug] all/11778: check syntax does not workwith path-up On Aug

Re: [racket-dev] intro videos

2011-07-13 Thread Jos Koot
I enjoyed your videos. Very nice. Can you do something about the missing menu bar? Also had a look to the first two videos of the computer science section of khanacademy.org. The second one, because it is not functional, immediately has to discern objects from copies of objects, which seems a very

Re: [racket-dev] interactive hack

2011-07-10 Thread Jos Koot
For racket? jOS -Original Message- From: dev-boun...@racket-lang.org [mailto:dev-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Eli Barzilay Sent: domingo, 10 de julio de 2011 19:52 To: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt; rafk...@cs.utah.edu; dev@racket-lang.org Subject: Re: [racket-dev] interactive hack Ok,

Re: [racket-dev] racket vs. scheme vs. clojure (as it appears to others)

2011-05-06 Thread Jos Koot
-Original Message- From: dev-boun...@racket-lang.org [mailto:dev-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Eduardo Bellani snip -- Eduardo Bellani omnia mutantur, nihil interit. The word 'omnia' frequently leads to contradictions, particularly when applying a sentence containing

Re: [racket-dev] Inline caching (was Re: my '312' this semester, how we compare to others)

2011-05-04 Thread Jos Koot
-Original Message- From: dev-boun...@racket-lang.org [mailto:dev-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Matthias Felleisen Sent: 04 May 2011 22:58 To: Tony Garnock-Jones; D Herring Cc: dev List Subject: Re: [racket-dev] Inline caching (was Re: my '312' this semester,how we

Re: [racket-dev] Wikipedia on macros... sigh

2011-03-11 Thread Jos Koot
Brown University Paper on Automata Macros (http://www.cs.brown.edu/~sk/Publications/Papers/Published/sk-automata-macro s/) of Shriram Krishnamurthi is an excellent addition. Jos -Original Message- From: dev-boun...@racket-lang.org [mailto:dev-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of John

Re: [racket-dev] Wikipedia on macros... sigh

2011-03-11 Thread Jos Koot
My main admiration is for Shriram Krishnamurthi of course. But JohnClements gave me the pointer. Hence also credit for him. Jos _ From: Gregory Woodhouse [mailto:gregwoodho...@me.com] Sent: 11 March 2011 20:21 To: John Clements; Shriram Krishnamurthi Cc: Jos Koot; 'PLT Developers

Re: [racket-dev] Packaging

2011-02-18 Thread Jos Koot
I read your contribution with great interest. One problem that is not addressed, as far as I have seen, is that any idiot, like me, can install his/her contributions (modules/collections/packages or whatever) For a simple windows 7 user as I it is rather difficult to use command line

Re: [racket-dev] irrelevant open problem reports

2011-02-17 Thread Jos Koot
...@gmail.com [mailto:robby.find...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robby Findler Sent: 16 February 2011 22:30 To: Jos Koot Cc: PLT Developers Subject: Re: [racket-dev] irrelevant open problem reports Thanks! I went back over these and closed all of them except 9692. Are you happy with the search replace

Re: [racket-dev] irrelevant open problem reports

2011-02-17 Thread Jos Koot
Thanks to you and all other members of PLT. Jos -Original Message- From: robby.find...@gmail.com [mailto:robby.find...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robby Findler Sent: 17 February 2011 14:54 To: Jos Koot Cc: PLT Developers Subject: Re: [racket-dev] irrelevant open problem reports

[racket-dev] irrelevant open problem reports

2011-02-16 Thread Jos Koot
A problem report query with originator Jos Koot shows 10 open PRs. As far as I can judge, all off them are already fixed or otherwise answered in a satisfying way. As far as I am concerned, they can be closed. Now I am enjoying 5.0.1.2. Thanks to the whole PLT !!! Jos Koot

Re: [racket-dev] Fwd: [racket-bug] drscheme/11585 impossible to enabletest suite coverage in main language

2011-02-04 Thread Jos Koot
It's ok on my windows 7 system. Jos -Original Message- From: dev-boun...@racket-lang.org [mailto:dev-boun...@racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of John Clements Sent: 04 February 2011 02:20 To: PLT Developers Subject: [racket-dev] Fwd: [racket-bug] drscheme/11585 impossible to

Re: [racket-dev] (round), etc. in Typed Racket

2010-12-14 Thread Jos Koot
I was not thinking of unsafe operations. Jos -Original Message- From: Vincent St-Amour [mailto:stamo...@ccs.neu.edu] Sent: 13 December 2010 18:11 To: Jos Koot Cc: 'Vincent St-Amour'; 'Noel Welsh'; dev@racket-lang.org Subject: Re: [racket-dev] (round), etc. in Typed Racket

Re: [racket-dev] (round), etc. in Typed Racket

2010-12-13 Thread Jos Koot
Does this also mean that procedures like round, floor and ceiling will produce exact integers even when given an inexact argument? I am not sure this would be a good idea. For example consider: Now (round #i1e200) - flonum of 64 bits. But (inexact-exact (round #i1e200)) - exact integer of over 600

Re: [racket-dev] (round), etc. in Typed Racket

2010-12-13 Thread Jos Koot
-Original Message- From: Vincent St-Amour [mailto:stamo...@ccs.neu.edu] Sent: 13 December 2010 17:01 To: Jos Koot Cc: 'Noel Welsh'; dev@racket-lang.org Subject: Re: [racket-dev] (round), etc. in Typed Racket At Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:43:58 +0100, Jos Koot wrote: Would we

Re: [racket-dev] How about adding this simple list-shuffling procedure to racket?

2010-11-11 Thread Jos Koot
When truly picking uniformally shuffled lists from a given list, see: http://telefonica.net/web2/koot/natural-to-permutation.scm and try (require srfi/27) ; for random-integer (require natural-to-permutation.scm) (let* ((lst (build-list 1000 (lambda (k) (round (quotient k 10)

Re: [racket-dev] `cond' / `when' / `unless' / etc bodies

2010-10-12 Thread Jos Koot
We already have begin-with-definitions. Would there be a great penalty to simply wrap every body-like sequence of expressions and definitions with begin-with-definitions? The latter even allows more freedom than (let () def ... expr ...), for it allows (begin-with-definitions def-or-expr ...). I

Re: [racket-dev] P4P: A Syntax Proposal

2010-07-28 Thread Jos Koot
With a good editor, like that of DrSceme, pardon me, RdRacket, I experience no difficulty at all with parentheses. In fact I hardly see them. DrRacket shows me the extent of a subsexpr very micely. I would have, may be, a problem when parsing symbolic expressions lacking parenteses, unless, of

[racket-dev] srfi41 for racket

2010-07-19 Thread Jos Koot
it in a promise. 3: A stream-pair could be a promise that yieds a pair, but it could also be a pair whose cdr is a promise. There is no reason to wrap a pair of promises in another promise. Your comments/critics/advises are welcome. Thanks, Jos Hartelijke groet, Jos Koot Carrer d'Argentona 17