Re: [sc-dev] ScRange::Parse return values

2007-10-23 Thread Noel Power
Hi Well, I also looked in the archives ( because I only had the last 2 messages in my mbox ) and I noticed Niklas's comment about using ScRange::ParseAny in ScRangeList::Parse - this *seems* to do exactly the right thing ( of course additionally the address = address + ':' address has to be

Re: [sc-dev] Error margins in Chart wizard

2007-10-23 Thread Bjoern Milcke
Hi Shelagh, I'm asking if this is a bug. I don't really know what error margins are but what is happening here does not make sense to me and does not fit with the research I've done on error markings for charts. The error margins use a percentage of the maximum value of a data series in both

Re: [sc-dev] ScRange::Parse return values

2007-10-23 Thread Noel Power
Hi Eike, On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 12:32 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: Hi Noel, You were faster than me.. well I would have been faster still if I had re-read fully (and understood) the content of original thread ;-) I also wanted to suggest to use ScRange::ParseAny. However, care must be taken of

Re: [sc-dev] ScRange::Parse return values

2007-10-23 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Noel, On Tuesday, 2007-10-23 12:32:25 +0100, Noel Power wrote: yes you are right, I am just passing SCA_VALID as the nMask so I didn't see this. Given if we change this there is a possibility that someone somewhere depends on the full set of range flags being set do you mean either

Re: [sc-dev] ScRange::Parse return values

2007-10-23 Thread Noel Power
Hi Eike thanks for the info :-) On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 14:59 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: Hi Noel, On Tuesday, 2007-10-23 12:32:25 +0100, Noel Power wrote: yes you are right, I am just passing SCA_VALID as the nMask so I didn't see this. Given if we change this there is a possibility that

Re: [sc-dev] ScRange::Parse return values

2007-10-23 Thread Noel Power
Hi Eike, the latest version of the patch is here http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/ooo-build/trunk/patches/ooxml/xmlfilter-fixup-singlerange-sheetref.diff + if ( (nRes SCA_VALID ) ( nTmp1 == nStartRangeBits ) ) + { + if (

Re: [sc-dev] Name for RCalc - tentative R4Calc

2007-10-23 Thread Leonard Mada
Wojciech Gryc wrote: Okay! So I guess this means we're going with R4Calc and R4Calc - R Statistics for OOoCalc... Yay! Niklas -- can we set up a CVS, in this case? Thanks, Wojciech Hi Wojciech, Great! I still don't understand why the paste is broken (and some other things - it's still