risks by just using the
ScRange::ParseAny for the XL_XX addressing variants
opinions?
Noel
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 12:35 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
Hi Niklas/Eike
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 12:00 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
Hi,
Finally go a chance to apply the changes from the cws and glad
Hi Eike,
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 12:32 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Noel,
You were faster than me..
well I would have been faster still if I had re-read fully (and
understood) the content of original thread ;-)
I also wanted to suggest to use
ScRange::ParseAny. However, care must be taken of
Hi Eike
thanks for the info :-)
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 14:59 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Noel,
On Tuesday, 2007-10-23 12:32:25 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
yes you are right, I am just passing SCA_VALID as the nMask so I didn't
see this. Given if we change this there is a possibility
Hi Eike,
the latest version of the patch is here
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/ooo-build/trunk/patches/ooxml/xmlfilter-fixup-singlerange-sheetref.diff
+ if ( (nRes SCA_VALID ) ( nTmp1 ==
nStartRangeBits ) )
+ {
+ if (
Hi Kohei
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
The presence of the base struct is to ease the handling of these
different filter types, so that the consumer of this API can store all
filters in a single container without sacrificing type safety too much.
thats a nice idea :-)
These data structures are
Hi Niklas
On Wed, 2007-06-27 at 17:43 +0200, Niklas Nebel wrote:
Noel Power wrote:
If you can let me know when you commit the change ( and to what
file(s) ) I will at least run some tests against that as a sanity check.
It's in sc/source/core/tool/address.cxx 1.9.18.1.
I also made a small
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Noel Power
OpenOffice Developer
Novell Ireland Software Limited
Corrig Court, Corrig Road
Sandyford Business Estate, Sandyford
Dublin 18
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Novell, Inc.
Software for the Open Enterprise
www.novell.com/open
SUSE® Linux Enterprise 10
Your Linux is ready
