On 10/18/06, David Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I plan to work on the home page, but I won't get much done until I get off
the road for awhile, which will be in a couple of weeks.
snip/
Great, you'll probably find a short description blurb (not more than
2-3 sentences--I'll try to take in
On Oct 18, 2006, at 5:46 PM, David Geary wrote:
If not working on it, I've been thinking about the homepage lately,
and it
strikes me that I don't really know how to spin Shale. We have so many
unrelated features that it's difficult to say Shale is The
addition of
JPA makes things even
On Oct 18, 2006, at 5:46 PM, David Geary wrote:
If not working on it, I've been thinking about the homepage lately,
and it strikes me that I don't really know how to spin
Shale. We have
so many unrelated features that it's difficult to say
Shale is
The addition of JPA makes
Maybe it's something like a meta-framework. It's not really a
framework as such because JSF is the framework.
But it is some missing parts that integrate fairly
seamlessly with
the JSF framework. Missing parts and added value -
things like Clay
and Dialog are added value.
On 9/25/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone on IRC brought up a good point about the Shale home page: We
don't say what Shale *is* until 1/3 of the way down the page.
I think the information in the paragraph that starts Thus, Shale
is... belongs up at the top of the page.
On 9/25/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/06, David Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, IMO, that paragraph and the rest of the Background section are
dated now that we've cut ties with Struts. We could probably do with a
new
introduction altogether.
I'm fine with
Not volunteering here but I definitely think we could streamline
things so that its easier to navigate. IMO we have too much crammed
onto that first page.
sean
On 9/25/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone on IRC brought up a good point about the Shale home page: We
don't say what
On 9/25/06, David Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, IMO, that paragraph and the rest of the Background section are
dated now that we've cut ties with Struts. We could probably do with a new
introduction altogether.
And a snazzy new logo, dammit.
James is running that show. :) Votes,
From: David Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2006/9/25, Wendy Smoak :
Someone on IRC brought up a good point about the Shale home page: We
don't say what Shale *is* until 1/3 of the way down the page.
I think the information in the paragraph that starts Thus, Shale
is... belongs up at
