Re: nightly mass-check issue with zmi masscheck

On Mittwoch, 5. April 2006 19:22 Justin Mason wrote: (For what it's worth, 0830 UTC was chosen as an hour that's not during working hours for most of the committers; UTC isn't good on that count, since it's 1600 PST.) I don't understand why my results made a problem then - process start

Re: nightly mass-check issue with zmi masscheck

Michael Monnerie writes: On Mittwoch, 5. April 2006 19:22 Justin Mason wrote: (For what it's worth, 0830 UTC was chosen as an hour that's not during working hours for most of the committers; UTC isn't good on that count, since it's 1600 PST.) I don't understand why my results made

[Bug 4802] implement DKIM plugin

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4802 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-06 10:20 --- hmm. I'm not sure it's appropriate to ship a v320.pre in a 3.1.x patch. that'd be overwritten as soon as the real 3.2.0 was released... --- You are

[Bug 3871] [review] spamd has option to specify user to run as, but no group

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3871 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-06 10:20 --- +1 (explicitly) for that revision anyway --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

[Bug 4856] New: DNSBL too strong in 3.1.1

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4856 Summary: DNSBL too strong in 3.1.1 Product: Spamassassin Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug 4856] DNSBL too strong in 3.1.1

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4856 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-06 10:28 --- Created an attachment (id=3456) -- (http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=3456action=view) sample message --- You are receiving

[Bug 3871] [review] spamd has option to specify user to run as, but no group

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3871 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-06 10:34 --- +1 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 3871] [review] spamd has option to specify user to run as, but no group

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3871 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|needs 1 vote|ready to commit

Re: nightly mass-check issue with zmi masscheck

On Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 11:10 Justin Mason wrote: If I change the scripts so that each day period isn't considered as running from -2359 UTC, and instead is considered as 0800-0759 UTC, that may be a good workaround... Yes please, thanks. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc

[Bug 4707] spamc crashes with -B and 6 chars of input

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4707 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug 4593] [review] spamc locks on IO error

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4593 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-06 11:39 --- The patch doesn't apply cleanly to 3.1 branch because bug 4707 was never fixed in 3.1. It really should, so I have reopened bug 4707. If we commit that one

[Bug 4856] DNSBL too strong in 3.1.1

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4856 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #3456|application/astarolicense |text/plain mime

[Bug 4707] spamc crashes with -B and 6 chars of input

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4707 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #3275 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 4707] [REVIEW] spamc crashes with -B and 6 chars of input

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4707 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|spamc crashes with -B and 6|[REVIEW] spamc crashes with

[Bug 4593] [review] spamc locks on IO error

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4593 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-06 15:10 --- Created an attachment (id=3458) -- (http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=3458action=view) patch against 3.1 branch after bug4707 patch

[Bug 4593] [review] spamc locks on IO error

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4593 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #3458 is|0 |1 obsolete|

[Bug 4707] [REVIEW] spamc crashes with -B and 6 chars of input

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4707 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-06 15:38 --- +1 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 4593] [review] spamc locks on IO error

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4593 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-06 15:39 --- +1 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 4707] [REVIEW] spamc crashes with -B and 6 chars of input

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4707 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|Needs 2 votes for 3.1 branch|Needs 1 vote for 3.1 branch

[Bug 4593] [review] spamc locks on IO error

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4593 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|needs 2 votes |needs 1 vote ---

[Bug 4593] [review] spamc locks on IO error

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4593 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|needs 1 vote|ready for commit ---

IP::Country 2.21 released

should hit the mirrors tonight: search.cpan.org/dist/ip-country thanks --nigel

[Bug 4707] [REVIEW] spamc crashes with -B and 6 chars of input

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4707 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug 4593] [review] spamc locks on IO error

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4593 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 4802] implement DKIM plugin

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4802 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-06 20:50 --- Mail-DKIM is already in CPAN: [5] Mail-DKIM-0.16 - Implements DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Uploaded: 26 Mar 2006 CPAN id: JASLONG (Jason Long)

[Bug 4802] implement DKIM plugin

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4802 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-06 21:38 --- (In reply to comment #10) hmm. I'm not sure it's appropriate to ship a v320.pre in a 3.1.x patch. that'd be overwritten as soon as the real 3.2.0 was

[Bug 4856] DNSBL too strong in 3.1.1

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4856 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 4802] implement DKIM plugin

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4802 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-06 22:16 --- (In reply to comment #12) So... Mail::DKIM is in CPAN, do we want to release the plugin anytime soon? Folks -- a small request: I am waiting for you

[Bug 4802] implement DKIM plugin

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4802 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-06 22:20 --- (In reply to comment #12) So... Mail::DKIM is in CPAN, do we want to release the plugin anytime soon? Hrm. So via bug 4850, we've already changed the

[Bug 4802] implement DKIM plugin

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4802 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-06 22:25 --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #12) So... Mail::DKIM is in CPAN, do we want to release the plugin anytime soon? Hrm. So via bug 4850,

[Bug 3871] [review] spamd has option to specify user to run as, but no group

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3871 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 4802] implement DKIM plugin

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4802 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-06 23:00 --- I wasn't planning to -- but since you've done the legwork of backporting the code, we might as well ;) Dave, I'd consider the current situation official.