-Original Message-
From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2008-11-06 12:47
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [SURBL-Announce] SURBL Usage Policy change (fwd)
just got this...
--- Forwarded Message
Date:Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:19:22 -0800
From:
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2008-08-01 11:44
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: KB_RATWARE_OUTLOOK_08
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 16:17 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/ORANK SCORE NAME
I have seen a LOT of invalid TLDs recently. I think someone's ratware is
borked.
--Chris
-Original Message-
From: Kevin A. McGrail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 12:24 PM
To: SpamAssassin Dev
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Weird Domain rPTR's
I've been
Title: RE: easier rule committing?
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 10:38 PM
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: easier rule committing?
- (b) more importantly: is this worth doing? Are we likely
Title: RE: easier rule committing?
- (b) more importantly: is this worth doing? Are we likely
to get more
interest in rule development if we do this?
Well besides being low key so I don't go pissing anyone
off, yes I would be
more active directly if it were easier to
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 6:53 PM
To: scottn
Cc: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: create SpamAssassin Rules Project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
scottn writes:
Bah I can't remember my bugzilla password :)
Please do NOT use RED list. It is experimental only.
Although I guess its fine to test the rates on.
THanks,
--Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2005 6:10 PM
To:
is.
I had written one, and so had Matt. Some notes right on homepage of:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/
Lots mote here:
http://www.exit0.us/
HTH,
Chris Santerre
SysAdmin and SARE/URIBL ninja
http://www.uribl.com
http://www.rulesemporium.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 2:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Chris Santerre; 'Duncan Findlay'; dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: rule secrecy, spammer evasion (was Re: PROPOSAL: create
SpamAssassin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 2:25 PM
To: Chris Santerre
Cc: 'Duncan Findlay'; dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: rule secrecy, spammer evasion (was Re: PROPOSAL: create
SpamAssassin Rules Project
-Original Message-
From: Herb Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 4:17 PM
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: PROPOSAL: create SpamAssassin Rules Project
From: Chris Santerre
To: 'Duncan Findlay'; dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Yes
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 12:57 AM
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: CEAS upshot
On Monday, July 25, 2005, 8:09:08 PM, Justin Mason wrote:
My notes on the various talks are here, if anyone's curious:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 12:35 PM
To: Herb Martin
Cc: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: create SpamAssassin Rules Project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
greetings
-Original Message-
From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 1:17 AM
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hackathon summary
Hello Duncan, All,
Saturday, July 23, 2005, 8:36:58 PM, you wrote:
DF * We discussed at length the ideas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 6:09 PM
To: Sidney Markowitz
Cc: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: create SpamAssassin Rules Project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sidney
So I think the one-off is more useful for developing a
ruleset while the
daily full MC is more useful for integration testing. Personally, I
participate in both. With my small corpus it's no biggie either way.
one-off corpus checks are a serious backbone to SARE's success. IT allows
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 9:03 PM
To: Theo Van Dinter
Cc: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: 3.2 and 3.3 proposal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Sat,
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 3:34 AM
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: CEAS chat and a hackathon
On Wednesday, June 22, 2005, 8:09:08 PM, Duncan Findlay wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 04:24:59PM -0400, Theo Van
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 3:59 AM
To: Spamassassin Devel List
Subject: Re: ws.surbl.org scores before and after Chris Santerre data
gone?
On Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 1:34:27 PM, Theo Dinter wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2005
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 4:34 PM
To: Spamassassin Devel List
Subject: Re: ws.surbl.org scores before and after Chris Santerre data
gone?
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 03:16:11PM -0700, Jeff Chan wrote:
If so can you
Wellthis
kind of goes along the idea of "bayes chains". You can look into which
pairs/treos of bayes tokens hit the most spam and least ham. Same goes for
rules. There are some scripts around the community to give top hitting rules,
which might come in very useful.
Once you find
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Quinlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 1:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: registrar boundary inconsistencies
I ran SURBL (well, a copy a few weeks old) through the
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Quinlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 2:07 PM
To: Chris Santerre
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: registrar boundary inconsistencies
Chris Santerre [EMAIL
, that the devs will most likely point and
laugh at me.
When is the ApacheCon Europe? When is the US one?
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE/SURBL Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most
FYI - After sustained and excellent contributions to SpamAssassin,
Daryl C. W. O'Shea has been added as a new committer to the Apache
SpamAssassin Project.
Daniel
Congrats Daryl! Fresh blood is always good.
So Daniel, what you're saying is we should now forward all our complaints to
Daryl?
embedded software
solutions IF I give away SA for free download, and Razor is used, it is
free. Even if used in a commercial enviorment.
If I add code to SA, bundle it with magic unicorn dust, box it, and sell it
to a company with Razor enabled, THEN that company must pay for it.
Chris Santerre
-Original Message-
From: Shelby Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 5:24 PM
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Should we disable/remove Razor?
Chris Santerre wrote:
[snip]
If a service is charging for use, and that is against your
license, then I
-Original Message-
From: Marc Perkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just something I've been wondering about - when interfacing to spam
assassin - who is using what MTA and why? Trying not to get into a
religoius debate here - just trying to understand MTAs that I
don't use.
For the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:34 PM
To: Spam Assassin Dev
Cc: MrElvey
Subject: Re: [SpamAssassin Wiki] Updated: CommercialNetworkAppliances
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Quinlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 3:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: MIT spam conference
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
looks like it *is* indeed on this year --
1) Dude that is one hell of a cool domain name for a non pron site! Cool!!
2) quasirhombicosidodecahedron.com also rocks as a domain name!
3) Your original complaint, doesn't exhist :)
You are NOT listed. Something is up. We have seen these more then a few
times.
hotnudiegirls.com is not listed
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Quinlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 4:25 PM
To: Chris Santerre
Cc: 'Samat Jain'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
dev@spamassassin.apache.org; SURBL Discussion list (E-mail)
Subject: Re: hotnudiegirls.com URI as false
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 9:16 PM
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: proposal: an automated rule-qa system
*SNIP*
We add a web-app somewhere that periodically scrapes bugzilla
for bugs on the rules
-Original Message-
From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 9:43 AM
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: limit on number of URIs decoded?
Anyway to see stats on number of URLs for Ham/Spam? I'm
thinking more then
100 URLs is rather large for an
First, great work Jeff.
While 102k domains isn't nearly as large as the 2.3M in dmoz,
it's certainly more than the 12k or so whitelist records we
currently have. How does the intersected list look as a
potential whitelist?
http://spamcheck.freeapp.net/whitelists/wikipedia-dmoz.srt
I
Well yeah, I had it happen to me and just removed a child. Everything was
fine after that. Its a configuration problem, not an SA problem. People are
used to seeing 1-2 instances running I think. Not used to having all the
instances preloaded I guess.
--Chris
-Original Message-
From:
-Original Message-
From: Dallas L. Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 12:01 PM
To: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Spamd is a memory hog (?)
Hey Chris,
Well yeah, I had it happen to me and just removed a child.
Everything was fine after
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Quinlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 2:01 PM
To: Chris Santerre
Cc: 'Jeff Chan'; SURBL Discuss; SpamAssassin Developers
Subject: Re: Revised DMOZ data, got Wikipedia domains too
Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I
38 matches
Mail list logo
