http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3703
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Justin, I need more information about what you require or need for
the patches you are porting to 3.0. It seemed like you had some
dbg() statements that were essentially higher in priority/severity
than most others of that type.
I think the best solution would be to add an info() or notice()
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3703
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-30 13:51 ---
Subject: Re: clean up debugging
Justin, I need more information about what you require or need for
the patches you are porting to 3.0. It seemed like you had
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3703
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-30 14:50 ---
Subject: Re: clean up debugging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Quinlan writes:
Do we want to require debug facilities to be
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3703
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|Future |3.1.0
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3703
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||3777
nThis|